Sentences with phrase «accept those differences in»

I generally accept differences in biblical interpretation with a shrug of my shoulders.

Hi I'm a single mom looking for someone who would be my good friend at start and would accept my difference in life... I'm just a simple lady longing for a loving, sincere and honest friend...

Either way, it's important that we learn to not only accept those differences in ourselves but respect them in others as well.

A Cash - Out Refinance allows you to take out a new home loan for more money than you owe on your current mortgage and accept the difference in cash.

Women staffers are not willing to accept these differences in pay between male senior managers and female junior employees anymore.

However the conversation starts, it's important that you both recognise and accept the differences in your sexual desires and, rather than seeing that difference as rejection, to enter into each other's language.

Not exact matches

What probably will make a difference is whether the board — which last fall paid out a $ 300 million special dividend to shareholders — accepts the offer by Arthur T. Demoulas to acquire the 50.5 percent stake in the $ 4.6 billion company now controlled by his cousin Arthur S. Demoulas and other family members.

In addition to normal risks associated with equity investing, international investing may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuations in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles, and from adverse political, social and economic instability in other nationIn addition to normal risks associated with equity investing, international investing may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuations in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles, and from adverse political, social and economic instability in other nationin currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles, and from adverse political, social and economic instability in other nationin generally accepted accounting principles, and from adverse political, social and economic instability in other nationin other nations.

For example, if you're choosing between a 10 - year adjustable - rate mortgage and a 30 - year fixed, and the difference in mortgage rate is 12.5 basis points (0.125 %), you may feel that there's little reason to accept the risk of an adjustable - rate loan.

Founded by anarchic ethical hacker collective Ztohoven, the cavernous ground floor space is fitted with the industrial light fittings and paper honeycomb furniture found in hip cafes, but there's a difference — the only form of payment accepted is the cryptocurrency Bitcoin.

If I'm accepted in my congregation, there should be a tolerance in ecumenical settings for a difference of belief on the issue, as there is for many issues.

Largely I would echo what Christine has already said about the way in which we feel accepted within our community, but if you'll bear with me for a little bit, I'd like to attempt to explain to Trey in particular what I see as the difference between this type of acceptance and the attitude of the many Christians who view homosexuality as sinful such as what you have encountered with your sister.

The one exceptional difference between them all is that the Bible clearly explains that the only way to escape eternity in literal hell fire that goes on forever and ever, is to accept the free gift of salvation that is only found in Jesus Christ the creator of all that you can see and can not see.

The only difference is the «degree of wackiness» — some supernatural beliefs and practices are generally accepted by society and a few are not, but none have a rational basis in the 21st century.

I am neither a christian or muslim but what right do christians have in making fun of muslims and their books when so much trash exists in their houses only difference being that other religions are open about their practices and even accept their mistakes..

The difference, however, is that going to a movie requires to you accept some non-truths in order to appreciate the story, while atheism requires that you seek truth and remain skeptical in the absence of evidence.

The problem is that a basic tenet of classical liberalism — a tenet generally accepted in the Western world by «liberals,» as well as by many «conservatives» — is that differences regarding fundamental principles of human nature and morality are not a threat to social and political life.

This ground is, quite simply, Christian faith in Christ, for I am persuaded that no full or genuine understanding of Christ is possible so long as the scholastic principle that there is an essential and eternal difference between God and the world is accepted.

The difference is that most kids outgrow the need to believe in Santa and their parents accept that change as a part of maturation.

These differences stem mainly from the fact that Jesus apparently accepted, though with some modifications, the apocalyptic ideas current in his time.

«In any group of young people there will probably be people who will at some point experience gender dysphoria so a respectful and caring discussion could make all the difference in terms of them feeling accepted, and could help them open up about how they feel,» he sayIn any group of young people there will probably be people who will at some point experience gender dysphoria so a respectful and caring discussion could make all the difference in terms of them feeling accepted, and could help them open up about how they feel,» he sayin terms of them feeling accepted, and could help them open up about how they feel,» he says.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

The difference here of course has nothing to do with trustung what «men» have written, it has to do with faith in whatever diety you believe... If you accept that there is a diety responsible for inspiring someone to write about them then really it is not the person writing but the diety writing through them... so your argument from that perspective is moot...

However, granted the difference in their use of «internal,» one can not say that Santayana rejects Whitehead's view that the relation is internal; he certainly accepts that it is intimate.)

Certainly we can not maintain this if we accept a metaphysical doctrine that refuses to admit any difference in kind between a living mind and a mechanical structure.

This emphasis upon the present and the past among the poor may be born of a lack of hope; but in some cases it may be a product of an honest cultural difference indicating a more self - accepting and less acquisitive style of life, a style which should be respected and not automatically deemed inferior to the more ambitious future - oriented activities of the middle classes.

Those who accept traditional physics and thermodynamics look upon this sort of dividing as «releasing energy», although they are using the term «energy» equivocally here, in my» view, since in part they mean «matter» (the energy» retained in the parts), and in part they» mean the difference between the energy required to maintain the integrity of the form (or «system») before it was divided, and the energy left in the parts.

But the third source of Tillich's thought, the tradition of German idealist philosophy, gives greater emphasis to impersonal conceptions and is more evident in his systematic discussion of the doctrine of God.33 He does not accept Hegel's vision of participation in the all - inclusive Absolute in which all differences are overcome in harmonious synthesis.

In other words, he assumes that accepting the fact of reasonable pluralism entails denying that differences on what he labels «ultimate questions» can be accounted for by saying that somebody has made what he calls «mistakes in reason.&raquIn other words, he assumes that accepting the fact of reasonable pluralism entails denying that differences on what he labels «ultimate questions» can be accounted for by saying that somebody has made what he calls «mistakes in reason.&raquin reason.»

If this aspect differed in kind in the case of Jesus from every other member of the species man, then in the present state of our knowledge it would seem impossible rightly to describe Jesus as a man.17 It may be the case that most Christians (and most Christian theologians) in most centuries have accepted this claim: but most have not shared either our modern sensitivity to the difference between history and mythology or our concern for the principles of logic.

In verse 65 it also does not make any difference WHETHER OR NOT a person has the inherent - free - will ability to accept or reject, the person can not come to Christ if God has not granted him to be called and drawn to Christ.

The WCC Commission on Faith and Order, meeting at Bristol, England, in i967, said: «In working toward the time when the churches, in spite of their existing differences, could accept each other in eucharistic fellowship, the ecumenical movement also works toward the time when a true Ecumenical Council can become an event.&raquin i967, said: «In working toward the time when the churches, in spite of their existing differences, could accept each other in eucharistic fellowship, the ecumenical movement also works toward the time when a true Ecumenical Council can become an event.&raquIn working toward the time when the churches, in spite of their existing differences, could accept each other in eucharistic fellowship, the ecumenical movement also works toward the time when a true Ecumenical Council can become an event.&raquin spite of their existing differences, could accept each other in eucharistic fellowship, the ecumenical movement also works toward the time when a true Ecumenical Council can become an event.&raquin eucharistic fellowship, the ecumenical movement also works toward the time when a true Ecumenical Council can become an event.»

But constancy, perseverance, a long obedience in one direction — this, of course, is precisely the difference between acting a role and accepting a role as a vocation.

I agree with what you have written from the biblical perspective and would like to take it further in the sense that that we are all sinners whether fornicators liars homosexuals the difference is that if we decide to follow Jesus we not only repent of our sin but we turn away from continuing to sin Remenber the woman caught in adultery Jesus said go and sin no more that applys to all of us that have accepted Jesus.But unless we die to our desires we cant live for him.brentnz

And as the years go by, each person in the group comes to understand the differences, to accept them, and to delight in them.

Why not accept the situation now for what it is and join the many other non-believers who are actually trying to make a positive difference in the world, instead of just trying uselessly to pray away our current crises?

Those who are wise in their own minds (whether they are «educated» or not makes no difference) often depend upon their own wisdom; whereas those who are know they have much to learn (that is, they are «babes») are willing to accept what Jesus reveals to them about the character and nature of God.

It makes a tremendous emotional and practical difference to one whether one accept the universe in the drab discolored way of stoic resignation to necessity, or with the passionate happiness of Christian saints.

The anima mundi, to whose disposal of his own personal destiny the Stoic consents, is there to be respected and submitted to, but the Christian God is there to be loved and the difference of emotional atmosphere is like that between an arctic climate and the tropics, though the outcome in the way of accepting actual conditions uncomplainingly may seem in abstract terms to be much the same.

Unlike midrange families, people are often accepted in their differences, and understood to be struggling to do right rather than as inherently hostile or destructive.

There is a difference between «believing» in something and accepting that the physical evidence is overwhelmingly in support of a specific theory.

One of the differences between science and religion is that a scientist is willing to change his understanding of the world in the face of new facts while a religious believer accepts only facts that support his beliefs.

The difference between Jews and Christians today is whether Jews accept the fulfillment of their scriptures in Jesus, their Messiah.

Science will gladly accept any evidence for there being gods, but the real difference here is that there just isn't any evidence to support the belief that any actual gods exist in the first place.

His naive use of class differences to identify excellence («Ministers of the better class are not satisfied to accept the rural churches») and his explicit call for theological schools to train persons to minister specifically to the rich suggest that this interest in theology, which is otherwise so thoroughly underemployed in Harper's proposed reform of theological schooling, is vulnerable to ideological misuse as a «cover» that at once obscures and legitimates an underlying concern to secure the churches» social status.

Basic differences between Mill and Hartshorne are to be found, not in their principles of morality, but in the reasons each offers for accepting a utilitarian moral theory.

Rockenstein found that there were significant differences in information acquisition and attitude change between churched children and non-churched children: churched children gained more of the information and accepted more of the attitudes communicated by the televised programs than did the non-churched children.

There is a huge difference from when I was 11 and accepted Jesus, and from me begging in tears for strength to repent and walk closer with God then HE granted it by HIS grace and mercy.

Philastrius of Brescia (d. 397) regarded Hebrews as written by Paul but not canonical; on the other hand, African synods held in 393 and 397 accepted the canonicity of «thirteen letters of the apostle Paul» and «of the same, one to the Hebrews», thus maintaining a distinction without a difference.

Jon Fox, I had previously decided to accept our differences and not get involved with you anymore as we were just going round in circles.