Sentences with phrase «accept those risks if»

Americans, though, have to be ready to accept some risk if they want China to change its behavior.

Volunteers are often more than willing to accept those risks if the experimental intervention offers potentially more promising treatment for their condition, compared with what is on the market.

However, you might decide to accept that risk if the pet appears to need immediate assistance, is a long distance from veterinary care, or the pet appears to be docile.

Not exact matches

If your business still accepts face - to - face transactions without EMV, not only are losing credibility among your customers, but you're facing some serious financial risk as well.

Another option that security experts suggest is this: if you accept credit card payments, delete card information after a transaction, thereby eliminating any risk hackers could break in and steal it.

If you want to innovate and put yourself out there, you have to accept that every entrepreneurial venture is a risk.

If I want low risk I accept lower returns, if I'm ok with higher risk I can go for higher returnIf I want low risk I accept lower returns, if I'm ok with higher risk I can go for higher returnif I'm ok with higher risk I can go for higher returns.

Then, ask yourself if you have been planning the trades (accepting risk), and then trading the plans (executing)... or have you frequently been failing to just let the original trade setups play out?

Retailers who accept payment in foreign currencies from foreign buyers understand currency risk: the prospect ending up with fewer dollars than anticipated if the foreign currency depreciates against the dollar before the sales proceeds are converted to dollars.

An old adage says that there is no free lunch in investing, meaning that if you want to increase potential returns, you have to accept more potential risk.

We need not assume that stocks will become reasonably valued anytime soon, but even if one is willing to accept some amount of speculative risk in an overvalued market, there's no need to accept undue risk at clearly overbought and overbullish points.

By creating an account, you agree to (a) provide accurate, current and complete account information, (b) maintain and promptly update from time to time as necessary your account information, (c) maintain the security of your password and accept all risks of unauthorized access to your account and the information you provide to us, and (d) immediately notify us if you discover or otherwise suspect any security breaches related to the Sites or your account.

If you send e-mail (encrypted or not) to us over the Internet, you are accepting the associated risks of lack of confidentiality.

We'll accept some amount of speculative market risk if internals improve sufficiently, and some amount of investment risk if valuations improve sufficiently.

These risks must be accepted should the downside risk to the economy lead to even worse outcomes if realized.

Accordingly, if we accept a greater amount of risk during favorable conditions, and less during unfavorable conditions, we expect to perform strongly - at controlled risk - over the complete market cycle.

If you accept currency risk then why concentrate in the US when you can just as easily buy a fund diversified across the entire world?

For example, if you're choosing between a 10 - year adjustable - rate mortgage and a 30 - year fixed, and the difference in mortgage rate is 12.5 basis points (0.125 %), you may feel that there's little reason to accept the risk of an adjustable - rate loan.

If you don't internationalize, you must accept the risk that your assets will be confiscated, taxed, regulated, and / or inflated away.

If the 30 - year Treasury yields 6 percent, why on Earth would you accept only 0.67 percent more income for a stock that has lots of risks versus a bond that has far fewer?

If we accept that properly implemented macroprudential policies can help to effectively combat financial vulnerabilities by strengthening resilience in the financial system and reducing systemic risk, this supports the view that authorities should look to these policies first when imbalances arise, before turning to monetary policy.

If you want a say in this, either grow a uterus and carry the fetus, or accept the facts: you don't bear the risk.

The fact that many of them risk getting laid off if they express something else than what is the accepted by the community.

How else will God know our love unless we take the high risk — with all its seeming lack of logic, sense, practicality, etc.?!! How else will the Universe know where to put its support if we aren't hanging out there, ready to accept it?

If we are honestly to embark upon a quest for a truly contemporary epiphany of Christ, we must be prepared to accept an ultimate risk, a genuine risk dissolving all certainty and security whatsoever.

If we are to accept his offer, we must also accept some measure of risk.

If accepted, they risk compromising the vital public, ecumenical, and prophetic witness of Christians to the dignity and rights of unborn children.

Although it is generally accepted that wine aging should take place without excessive exposure to oxygen, there is a risk for a wine to develop reduced or off - odors if conditions become too reductive, as often observed with tightly - sealed closures like screw caps.

«If you want to play football when you walk on the pitch, you have to accept the gamble and the risk as part of the game.

so who is fibbing here??? if we can afford to risk loosing 100 million by letting Sanchez, Ozil and Chambo go for free next year why cant we just accept the paltry offers for players we don't need in our squad any longer.

Another thought, can't we just accept risking players wouldn't be a necessity if we actually bought re-enforcements?

I say that because Sanchez will have a difficult choice to make: If no one improves our offer (assuming there is one) before the window closes and he chooses to play his contract out he runs the risk of having a serious injury midway through the season which will reduce his ability to get the kind of five year contract I am sure he is hoping for, where as if he accepts ours he is safe for the next, extremely important and perhaps the last five years of his playing career but one thing is sure and I say it again only a fool would sign before exploring all the possibilities and that in itself made and makes it impossible for the club to have «made» him sign earlieIf no one improves our offer (assuming there is one) before the window closes and he chooses to play his contract out he runs the risk of having a serious injury midway through the season which will reduce his ability to get the kind of five year contract I am sure he is hoping for, where as if he accepts ours he is safe for the next, extremely important and perhaps the last five years of his playing career but one thing is sure and I say it again only a fool would sign before exploring all the possibilities and that in itself made and makes it impossible for the club to have «made» him sign earlieif he accepts ours he is safe for the next, extremely important and perhaps the last five years of his playing career but one thing is sure and I say it again only a fool would sign before exploring all the possibilities and that in itself made and makes it impossible for the club to have «made» him sign earlier.

If you're driving your child around at all, you've already accepted a whole lot more risk than can possibly be posed by simply leaving Junior to his nap while you zip into the bank for a second.

Many breastfed babies don't accept a bottle, however, and there is also the risk of nipple confusion for babies starting to reject the breast if introducing a bottle too early.

Personally I think you are better off accepting your child is quite likely to try something at some stage and if they have the information of the risks then they will handle it better.

I accept that a properly trained midwife is better than an optimistic, badly informed idiot — but if you are genuinely low risk, it won't make that much difference.

If you are low risk and everything is normal, you don't actually need skill — though I accept that a midwife can be reassuring and helpful — but what can they actually DO if they are in a place without help / resourceIf you are low risk and everything is normal, you don't actually need skill — though I accept that a midwife can be reassuring and helpful — but what can they actually DO if they are in a place without help / resourceif they are in a place without help / resources?

Even if you can accept the contamination risks, there's something about sharing bodily fluids with a stranger that I'm not really down with.

If you are healthy and experiencing a low risk pregnancy, choose a hospital where your birthing philosophy is accepted and will be supported.

Consumer brands are usually very sensitive to how they're perceived, making them far more vulnerable to online action than a typical politician — Congressional offices EXPECT to get criticized via email, and they accept that many constituents will simply never be happy with them, but a corporation takes a great risk if it runs off even a few of its customers.

The reproductive health act, first introduced by former Governor Eliot Spitzer, would set in state law the right to accept or refuse contraception and the right to have a late term abortion, if a doctor determines that the health of the mother is at risk.

If the tab for retroactive pay grew large enough to risk breaking the city budget, even labor - friendly politicians would balk — and unions would have to accept concessions.

But for the past two weeks, the governor has added various budget components to the extenders — obliging lawmakers to accept his spending ideas or risk being blamed for a government shutdown if the weekly appropriation fails to pass.

So if they see seashells by the seashore, it seems like they'll swim toward them, accepting the risk of collision in return for having landmarks for just where the heck they are.

Even if one chose to accept the risk of handling a spacecraft inside a human - occupied sealed vessel, we would face the final problem of how to build a chamber wide enough or a doorway strong enough to get a large spacecraft inside.

Indeed, if one accepts a very liberal risk level of 50 % for mean global warming of 2 °C (the guiderail widely adopted) since the start of the industrial age, then under midrange IPCC climate sensitivity estimates, then we have around 30 years before the risk level is exceeded.

Sure, epidurals like any form of pain medication carry risks, but those risks apply to the mother, not the baby, and if the mother judges the pain to be severe enough to accept the small risks associated with epidurals (like the 1 % risk of spinal headache), it makes sense to accept those risks.

If you accept that conclusion, then eating less animal protein gives you less heart deaths, but must INCREASE YOUR RISK OF DYING FROM SOMETHING ELSE.

If one accepts the proposed 2 percent risk reduction

At minimum, if you accept the premise of this study, that means that more than millions of Americans with iodine deficiency may be at risk of thyroid problems from soy consumption.