Sentences with phrase «accept your arguments because»

But no court has accepted this argument because, now that public schools no longer have a Protestant character, the Blaine Amendments no longer function in a way that favors or disfavors particular religious groups.

I do not accept your arguments because they go on the contrary of what has been reported sometimes even on the headline of the article, and when asked for a source or proof you paraphrase the same point, post a passive - agrressive comment, or talk about your credentials as if somehow that alone invalidated the point being made against your claims.

Not exact matches

That is because the Tax Court accepted the taxpayer's argument that it need not share stock - based compensation costs under a qualified cost - sharing agreement because arm's length parties would not do so.

Every person of every faith can make the same argument, and by that logic, it means EVERY god that has ever been posited should be accepted because there is no evidence to the contrary.

The rest of Nye's argument that believers in creation need to accept evolution because everyone else supposedly does is ludicrous.

If you accept that as your basic premise, then arguments for God's existence will obviously make sense to you because they just confirm what you al; ready believe to be true.

In contrast, constitutional stipulations that are substantive contradict the provision for constitutional change because they falsely assert that they must be explicitly accepted by any political participant who seeks to change them democratically The contradiction becomes fully apparent if we recognize that the argument for permitting substantive constitutional prescriptions also permits an established religion.

And the argument that I should accept my lower status because I'm able to bear children is essentially equating me with my uterus.

Hardin immediately accepted that opinion — as I do also — because, in terms of his argument, this factor is morally irrelevant.

But if we reject the ontological argument, we should do so because it does not work, not because we have decided a priori that only empirical arguments are to be accepted.

I'm not saying that is how the bible was manufactured — how the bible came to be is ENTIRELY irrelevant to my point — your argument that you can accept something as true because it is consistent doesn't hold water.

Hey guess what, people who don't believe in your bible are not going to accept «the bible is true because it says it is» as any kind of an argument.

If Chad and others argue that naturalistic evolution must be dismissed because we don't know exactly what happened with gene mutation and transmission frequencies during particular periods of rapid change, then how can we accept a replacement argument in which we don't even know what happens at all?

So - what if they accept flaws in their argument (which I usually get them to do), they ignore the flaws (because, as they say, I have the burden of proof), and begin their arguments on the offensive.

Even if one attempts by subtle arguments to show that somehow men really accept Christ in their very seeming rejection of him (because the Christian witness they encounter is either unworthy or incomplete and so on), there is still always the possibility of sin, of closing in on oneself against Christ.

Argument from ignorance: the proposition (The God of Israel is not real) is true because it has not yet been proven false, it is «generally accepted».

I generally do not accept the «God changed because Jesus saved us» argument because that implies that this all loving god could have saved us long before jesus came, but chose not to for some reason and instead prefered burning cities and tormenting a loyal follower to prove a point to his fallen angel buddy.

I get angry when my most reasoned arguments are dismissed as «emotional» and «shrill» or when people question my commitment to my faith because I accept evolution or support women in ministry.

First, discussion of Intelligent Design's argument against neo-Darwinism is out of place in a high - school science classroom because most scientists working in the area do not accept the Intelligent Design criticism of neo-Darwinism and because understanding the scientific issues involves sophisticated arguments far beyond the capacity of nonspecialists, let alone high - school students.

Because I like Ichiro more than Rose, I'm more likely to accept arguments in his favor.

Ignoring your insane, made - up statistics, your argument is that because babies die in hospitals and elsewhere by other means that we should all accept home birth deaths as well and refrain from discussing how to prevent them?

Lewis I think you prosecute your argument well and powerfully, that complaining about unfair treatment because of who you happen to be fits oddly with accepting the privileges and duties of hereditary monarchy.

«It is one that is not going to happen and I think that those backbenchers who keep putting forward those sorts of ideas should just come out and accept that what they really want is for Britain to leave the European Union because that is the argument they are actually making.»

There's also the argument that DACA will, in time, be accepted by the republicans because the DACA immigrants are the most acceptable and Trump even said «We love the dreamers».

Your correspondent, therefore, found it hard to accept the argument that the Palestinians have lost their right to self - determination in their homeland simply because their forefathers violently resisted partition.

The argument made about gay men still buying the drug but under unregulated conditions has probably been accepted by the Home Office behind closed doors — but it can not accept it in public, because it is one of the key general arguments for drug legalisation.

I also can't accept the argument about not having time, because this meal takes ten minutes to prepare in a slow cooker, and if you can't afford a slow cooker, there are plenty to be found on craigslist.org or freecycle.org, or in thrift stores.

In particular, the fact that voucher programs involve a subsidy to religious schools could complicate the analysis, because the Court has occasionally accepted the argument that the failure to provide a subsidy for an activity or institution does not itself constitute impermissible discrimination.

The trial court accepted the plaintiff's argument that restricting the scholarships to secular subjects at religiously - affiliated schools would not suffice because religion can pervade all subjects at such schools.

We accept the drugmakers» argument that they have to charge twice as much for prescriptions as in any other country because lawmakers in nations like Germany and France don't pay them enough to recoup their research costs.

It would be different, perhaps, if the book were not written yet, because then the selling your voice argument would carry more weight, but girl, you're just trying to sell something you want too much for someone to accept, and it's too hard to say «Please Like Me» or, in your case, your book.

The attorney for PHEAA said, «As you know a lot of Courts attempted to pursue undue hardship and find undue hardship in order to get at a partial discharge, and that's a tendency that has to be resisted, and it has to be resisted in this case because the debtor has to meet each and every one of the prongs in order to first find undue hardship and so, you know, we can understand why Judge Radcliffe may have gone to accept the Debtor's argument.»

If they don't, either because they are obstinate, or because they do not accept the argument given, then the paper will be published.

Yet some green campaigners who accept the nuclear argument still oppose the technology because, they say, nuclear reactors require a king's ransom to build.

This may not appear so to the casual observer because each side accepts their side's arguments as reliable and the other's not.

I presented a list of simple statements for you to accept or deny because you had failed to make any rational argument to back up your sneers.

I even gave a bit of the «elevator speech» that a proponent would use, while saying I didn't accept his conclusions (in large part because the conclusions contradicted other, more convincing arguments).

The reason it's huge is because mainstream environmentalists have long accepted the argument that economic growth is good for the environment.

Because you can very well accept that climate change exists and still find arguments against climate action because the costs of doing something are soBecause you can very well accept that climate change exists and still find arguments against climate action because the costs of doing something are sobecause the costs of doing something are so great.

Wait a minute... do you think, just maybe, they don't want NASA collecting any more evidence, because it might further undermine their «uncertainty» argument and make their science denial even harder to accept?

Because lawyers are committed to equal treatment under the law, they generally strive to cabin their legal arguments in logos — deductive and inductive reasoning, grounded in generally accepted premises.

If this argument that «legal expenses incurred to resist a demand for child support... serve to increase or preserve his income» (at para 25) had been accepted, Grenon would have been able to deduct his legal expenses because those expenses would have then been incurred to gain or produce income, as required by paragraph 18 (1)(a) of the Income Tax Act.

The First Circuit panel also accepted Hughes Hubbard's argument that his request to have his claim considered by the highest court of Massachusetts was untimely because he chose to file his case in federal court and go to trial without requesting that the state court consider his novel legal theory.

The Supreme Court refused the MPS permission to appeal on its initial ground of appeal which was premised on its argument that the positive obligation (which they accepted arose under the ECHR by operation of art 1 in conjunction with art 3) did not arise under the HRA because art 1 is not one of the rights contained in schedule 1 of the HRA.

Because, with all due respect to Côté J's argument that the issue in this case relates to a matter of general importance to the legal system as a whole (solicitor - client privilege), it is hard to accept the characterization of this decision as about solicitor - client privilege, rather than about the interpretation of the Privacy Commissioner's home statute.

In a unanimous decision, the Court accepted Federation arguments that a claim that documents should be exempt from disclosure because they are protected by solicitor - client privilege should not be subject to a public interest override provision.

The application judge accepted the argument of the respondent that the application had to be dismissed on the ground that the application was not properly brought under rule 14.05 because the request for a mandatory order was not ancillary to a claim for relief.

Not only did they not accept the arguments regarding the serious nature of the issue to the insurer they found that the insurer's application was premature because they had not exhausted all of the remedies available in the LAT such as a Request for Reconsideration.

The judge accepted D's argument that the failure to allege delay in the LOC was relevant conduct under CPR 44.2 because D had been given no opportunity to avoid litigation.

In the end, I accept the respondents» arguments that, in this case, that consideration is not determinative because no party wishes the Court to refuse to make the orders on that ground.90