The Church's teaching on artificial forms of contraception is presented, and students are made aware of natural family planning not only as a morally
acceptable means of family planning but also as an important means developing sensitivity between a married couple thereby helping build the exclusive relationship we know as marital friendship.
Not exact matches
In essence, it's about being professional and taking care, which
means don't: agree to meet alone; allow over-familiarity; give out your personal mobile number; meet informally outside working hours and away from your organisation's premises (and certainly don't do so without getting formal approval); allow too frequent contact or over familiarity that may be
acceptable with friends, colleagues and
family but not from people with whom you only have a commercial relationship; discuss your private life, or social or recreational interests
of you or your partner; accept offers, discounts or other services or products by the client, customer or contractor; accept hospitality or gifts that you yourself wouldn't pay for from your own pocket; and don't do anything that makes you feel uncomfortable, obligated or might be open to misinterpretation or might be difficult to explain to your manager, a journalist or an investigator.
If you think it's a good deal and will provide you, and your
family, a head start for the future and feel like their plan works with an
acceptable amount
of risk then by all
means go for it.
I actually think the Rules
of Court are minor drivers
of costs compared to the increasing complexity
of law / equity compared to 60 years ago and our treasured beliefs in certain principles that don't necessarily have rigorous research supporting them (cross-examination is the best way to truth; an independent bench
means it is perfectly
acceptable to have someone who practiced
family law their entire career sit on a 6 week construction case).