Sentences with phrase «acceptable rating on»

The charges result from a discipline hearing that resulted from Robinson's failure to obtain an acceptable rating on four consecutive audits.

The redesigned Camry also has headlights that earn either a good or acceptable rating on all trim lines.

Three of the 17 fell short of an acceptable rating on the basis of glare alone.

Goldman offered a derivative instrument that would allow me to not take too risky of an investment strategy, and credit an acceptable rate on the GIC.

Not exact matches

Now, if negative 10 - 12 year total returns on stocks are acceptable to Wall Street, given the level of interest rates, that's fine, but investors should understand that this is what's being argued, and that the level of interest rates doesn't change that expectation.

Third, on - going (and possibly higher) structural deficits are acceptable provided they are the result of investments to strengthen economic growth, financed by long - term interest rates low enough to make them affordable.

As Christians, we should not passively stand on the side of respectability politics that suggests this rate of incarceration is necessary or acceptable.

The burger was dubbed «exceptional,» the highest designation on the list, while the line's Tex - Mex burger was given an «acceptable» rating, the second - highest category on the list.

Based on my research about this I have found that this stroller has an acceptable number of review ratings that would make me comfortable recommending it to other parents.

«Nationally, only one third of fourth graders read proficiently on national assessments, and preschool or school - age programs alone are not enough to raise these rates to acceptable levels, especially for the most vulnerable children.

Observers have to pass an initial certified training course and also undergo bi-annual recertification where their rating scores on online classroom videos have to fall within what is regarded as an acceptable margin of error.

In announcing the 2000 test results last week, Virginia education officials said that 22 percent, or 406 of the state's 1,874 public schools, had posted acceptable passing rates on the state's rigorous Standards of Learning exams administered to students last spring.

Arlington Assistant Superintendent Warren Hopkins said the district's high dropout rate isn't acceptable and that graduating on time isn't as important as staying in school.

The district, rated «Academically Acceptable» by the state education agency for the past 2 years, had a 60 % pass rate on the state standardized eighth - grade mathematics assessment exam.

Postscript: On August 7, 2015, the teachers, non-teaching staff, parents, and students of Eastside Memorial High School were notified that their school has reached a rating of «acceptable» on the STAAR (formerly the TAKS the state's primary statewide testing assessment) for the first time in 10 years and was rated the number school in the state for achieving academic progress over a single academic yeaOn August 7, 2015, the teachers, non-teaching staff, parents, and students of Eastside Memorial High School were notified that their school has reached a rating of «acceptable» on the STAAR (formerly the TAKS the state's primary statewide testing assessment) for the first time in 10 years and was rated the number school in the state for achieving academic progress over a single academic yeaon the STAAR (formerly the TAKS the state's primary statewide testing assessment) for the first time in 10 years and was rated the number school in the state for achieving academic progress over a single academic year.

A board of trustees may not vote on the final approval of the innovation plan if the district is assigned with either a preliminary or final rating below acceptable performance.

(8) LIMITED BUYDOWN. - The term «limited buydown» means, subject to the conditions described in section interest rate has increased between -» (A)(i) the date on which a project application acceptable to the Secretary is submitted; or» (ii) the date on which the Secretary entered into a master credit agreement; and» (B) the date on which the Secretary executes the Federal credit instrument.»

In the latest round of testing on midsize SUVs, all but three models tested failed to achieve even an «Acceptable» rating.

The Toyota RAV4 is also an Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Top Safety Pick, having received the institute's highest rating of good (on a scale of poor, marginal, acceptable and good) in side and small - and moderate - overlap frontal crash tests, along with tests of its roof strength, head restraints and seats.

IRVINE, Calif., November 3, 2017 — The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has awarded its best rating possible, Top Safety Pick Plus (TSP +), to 2018 Kia Souls when equipped with high - intensity discharge (HID) headlights — offered on the Primo Lit package — and 2018 Kia Sportages built after June 2017 when equipped with newly acceptable - rated HID headlights that are standard on the SX Turbo trim.

2 2017 Kia Forte built after March 2017 when equipped with optional front crash prevention and high intensity discharge (HID) headlights with Dynamic Bending Light; 2017 Optima built after March 2017 when equipped with optional front crash prevention and LED headlights with High Beam Assist, 2017 Cadenza when equipped with optional front crash prevention and specific headlights, and 2018 Sorento built after May 2017 when equipped with newly acceptable - rated headlights offered on the SX Limited and the SX with Advanced Technology package.

1 2018 Kia Souls when equipped with high - intensity discharge (HID) headlights (Primo Lit package) and 2018 Sportages built after June 2017 when equipped with newly acceptable - rated headlights offered on the SX Turbo trim.

When it comes to the IIHS determining crashworthiness, ratings range from good, acceptable, and marginal, and are based on five tests, including moderate overlap front, small overlap front, side, roof strength, and head restraints testing.

This is a surprisingly pleasant hybrid system that delivers more than acceptable acceleration — with a 0 to 62mph time rated at 8.7 seconds — and strong fuel economy: the equivalent of just over 28 imperial mpg on the US EPA's city test cycle, and better than 42mpg on its highway cycle.

IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests, a roof strength test for rollover protection, plus evaluations of seats / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.

Seats and head restraints with geometry rated good or acceptable are tested in a simulated rear impact conducted on a sled.

The Institute's dynamic ratings of good, acceptable, marginal, or poor are derived from two seat design parameters (peak acceleration of the dummy's torso and time from impact initiation to head restraint contact with the dummy's head) plus neck tension and shear forces recorded on BioRID during the test.

The Institute downgraded the Smart's structural rating from good to acceptable, but the opening didn't appear to affect dummy movement during the test, and injury measures on the driver dummy were low.

The ratings of good, acceptable, marginal, or poor are based on geometric measurements of head restraints and simulated crashes that together assess how well people of different sizes would be protected in a typical rear - end collision.

Those in some Dodge Grand Caravan / Chrysler Town & Country models are rated acceptable, based on recent evaluations by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

Also, while the ease of LATCH system use on the Accord is rated «Acceptable» on the Accord, the Sonata gets a less - than - impressive «Marginal» rating.

2018 IIHS Top Safety Pick + when equipped with optional Automatic Emergency Braking and LED headlights with Dynamic Bending Lights on vehicles built after September 2017 To qualify for 2018 TOP SAFETY PICK +, a vehicle must earn good ratings in the driver - side small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint tests, as well as an acceptable or good rating in the passenger - side small overlap front test.

2018 IIHS Top Safety Pick + when equipped with optional Automatic Emergency Braking and High Beam Assist on vehicles built after December 2017 To qualify for 2018 TOP SAFETY PICK +, a vehicle must earn good ratings in the driver - side small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint tests, as well as an acceptable or good rating in the passenger - side small overlap front test.

Two other minivans, the Kia Sedona and the Nissan Quest, fall short on rollover protection, with the Sedona receiving the lowest rating of poor and the Quest ranking as acceptable.

On the other hand, the 2 - door Focus performed better than the 4 - door version, earning a good rating in the side test and a Top Safety Pick designation compared with the 4 - door's acceptable performance in the side test.

Of its four tests, the frontal offset test, side impact test, roof strength test and rear crash protection / head restraint test, the Suzuki Equator scored a highest possible grade of «Good» on three, with a second highest possible rating of «Acceptable» on the rear crash protection test.

For example, the 4 - door Civic earns a good rating in the Institute's side test and is a Top Safety Pick while the 2 - door version is rated acceptable in the side test because of higher forces on the driver dummy's chest, abdomen, and pelvis.

In its crashworthiness program, the Institute rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in moderate overlap front, small overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint evaluations.

The TSP + rating also requires that a vehicle earn an Acceptable or Good rating on the IIHS» small frontal overlap test which simulates hitting a utility pole with the front corner of the car.

Its EPA ratings of 28 mpg in the city and 37 mpg on the highway, are quite acceptable.

IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in a moderate overlap frontal crash, small overlap frontal crash, side impact and rollover, plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.

To highlight acceptable to good performance in the new crash criterion of small overlap, the IIHS has up rated its Top Safety Pick award by adding on a plus sign (+).

IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in a moderate overlap frontal crash, small overlap frontal crash, side impact and rollover, as well as evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.

However, based on an Institute test of a 2004 RAV4 with side airbags, the structure rating improves to Acceptable for all 2004 - 05 models.

The base LED headlights on the IS earn an acceptable rating for visibility provided to the driver.

According to its 2014 crash test ratings, the Impala offers the best overall safety of any car on this list, earning good ratings in the IIHS's crash tests save for an acceptable in the small overlap test.

Riding on big 20 - inch alloy wheels shod with 245/45 Z - rated Goodyear tyres, ride quality is acceptable but gets a little harsh on shoddy, chopped - up back roads.

The optional HID lights on Sportages built after June create some glare for drivers of oncoming vehicles and therefore earn an acceptable rating.

The headlights that come standard on other Q70s are rated acceptable, but consumers can't get these headlights with the superior - rated front crash prevention system.

The Institute rates most head restraint designs good, acceptable, marginal, or poor based on how a restraint meets these two criteria for an average male.