Clients will negotiate a mutually
acceptable settlement without having a judge decide issues;
Not exact matches
Ultimately, any negating of this obligation will likely only disadvantage the client, by likely extending the litigation process and related cost,
without enhancing the evidence upon which an
acceptable settlement might be attained.
The SCC recognized the benefits to allowing parties to reach a «mutually
acceptable resolution to their dispute», «
without prolonging the personal and public expense and time involved in litigation».9 The SCC further cited the benefits of
settlement which were enunciated in Sparling v. Southam Inc., as follows:
One reason a party might choose to make a
settlement offer would be simply to resolve the dispute on terms that are
acceptable to all,
without the requirement of a trial.
The $ 2.6 M
settlement sent a resounding message that the practice of putting a name in a system and returning back whatever the raw results are,
without any meaningful quality assurance filter, is no longer
acceptable.
By dealing head - on with the emotional dynamics in a proactive and constructive way, collaborative divorce helps keep the parties on track toward reaching a mutually
acceptable and durable
settlement agreement
without getting sidetracked around an emotional issue.
The benefits of a Collaborative process include negotiating a mutually
acceptable settlement to all parties
without having a Judge decide.