Difference: atheists that accept evolution, or the theory that all life came from a common ancestor, are more often than not willing to discount
that acceptance upon evidence to the contrary.
Not exact matches
When Ezra cries, «Thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve,» (Daniel 9:16) or a prayer in the Book of Nehemiah says, «Thou art just in all that is come
upon us; for thou hast dealt truly, but we have done wickedly,» (Nehemiah 9:33) or Daniel exhausts tautology in confessing, «We have sinned, and have dealt perversely, and have done wickedly, and have rebelled,» (Daniel 9:5) we see the self - accusation which resulted from the
acceptance of national misfortune not as an
evidence of Yahweh's weakness in protecting his people but as proof of his inflexible righteousness.
An atheist will not value an
acceptance of something not founded
upon empirical
evidence as a good reason for an outrageous claim.
Yet we are witnesses to the amazing spectacle of the uncritical
acceptance of this unscientific and romantic assumption by men who, in every other sphere of life, pride themselves
upon their devotion to
evidence presented by «the hard stuff of the world of physical and social experience.»
«For the past five years, TAVR has been growing in use and
acceptance largely based
upon clinical
evidence from multiple randomized controlled trials, but these have been limited to patients at the highest risk for surgery,» said Martin B. Leon, M.D., professor of medicine and director of the Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy at Columbia University Medical Center - New York Presbyterian Hospital and co-principal investigator of the PARTNER trials.