It stresses that knowledge is created when we converse using
accepted academic discourse.
Not exact matches
By 1980, however, the somewhat chastened magazine acknowledged he was not: «God is making a comeback Most intriguingly, this is happening not among theologians or ordinary believers — most of whom never
accepted for a moment that he was in any serious trouble — but in the crisp, intellectual circles of
academic philosophers, where the consensus had long banished the Almighty from fruitful
discourse.»
If sceptics were taken more seriously, if there was a debate... if there was a political, or
academic culture which
accepted debate... Cardiff wouldn't produce such rank pseudo-science, and social scientists in Nottingham could be more confident about the definition of «space in the ecosystem of climate change
discourse», but probably would chose his words — and his coordinates — more carefully.