He (Mann) stated that he never deleted emails at the behest of any other scientist, specifically including Dr. Phil Jones, and that he never withheld data with the intention of obstructing science; and he stated that he never engaged in activities or behaviors that were inconsistent with
accepted academic practices.
We construct these six factor portfolios in accordance with widely
accepted academic practice.
Not exact matches
One remains: whether Mann was involved in «any actions that seriously deviated from
accepted practices within the
academic community for proposing, conducting, or reporting research or other scholarly activities.»
In 1988 he
accepted the position of
Academic Dean at National College which he held until 1993, when he returned to full - time
practice.
In a break with past
practices, the majority of the new small schools
accepted students at all levels of
academic proficiency and thus were open to those who would likely have attended the closed schools.
Access meaningful learning experiences (current theory, research, and developments in relevant
academic disciplines, professional development opportunities, and ideas from colleagues and supervisors) and exercises judgment in
accepting findings as valid for application in classroom
practice and teacher improvement.
«Did Dr. Michael Mann engage in, or participate in, directly or indirectly, any actions that seriously deviated from
accepted practices within the
academic community for proposing, conducting, or reporting research or other scholarly activities?»
More specifically, the Investigatory Committee determined that Dr. Michael E. Mann did not engage in, nor did he participate in, directly or indirectly, any actions that seriously deviated from
accepted practices within the
academic community for proposing, conducting, or reporting research, or other scholarly activities.
It's unclear why the committee didn't immediately exonerate Mann of the fourth allegation — seriously deviating from
accepted practices within the
academic community — except that by leaving it open, the committee apparently hoped to rebuild «public trust in science in general and climate science specifically.»
The recommended investigation will focus on determining if Mann «engaged in, directly or indirectly, any actions that seriously deviated from
accepted practices within the
academic community for proposing, conducting or reporting research or other scholarly activities.»
Similar questions may have been asked in 2006 but the National Academy of Sciences panel did not carry out an «in depth» investigation into whether Mann had «deviated from
accepted practices within the
academic community for proposing, conducting, or reporting research or other scholarly activities.»
«The investigatory committee's charge will be to consider what are the bounds of
accepted practice in this instance and whether or not Dr. Mann did indeed engage in, or participate in, directly or indirectly, any actions that seriously deviated from
accepted practices within the
academic community for proposing, conducting, or reporting research or other scholarly activities.»
(1) fabrication, falsification, plagiarism or other
practices that seriously deviate from
accepted practices within the
academic community for proposing, conducting, or reporting research or other scholarly activities.
Breach of rule: You did fabricate, falsifiy, or engage in other
practices that seriously deviate from
accepted practices within the
academic community for proposing, conducting, or reporting research or other scholarly activities.
Well, these all still fall under accusation # 4, that Mann did «engage in, or participate in, directly or indirectly,... actions that seriously deviated from
accepted practices within the
academic community.»
In light of the increasingly interdisciplinary nature of
academic research, especially in the legal academy, wouldn't it be preferable if we abandoned currently
accepted legal citation
practices for secondary resources, both print and online, and just used the MLA style?
We try to ascertain, from your personal statement in the application form, from your references and the interview, whether you have the qualities one would expect in a person who wishes to become a counsellor, for example: openness to experience; an
accepting attitude (sometimes called «non-judgemental») towards others; some understanding of the nature of prejudice; the ability to reflect on life experience; the ability to cope with the
academic demands of the course and the practical and emotional demands of counselling
practice.