Sentences with phrase «accepted arguments against»

Moreover, judges have not always accepted arguments against providing replies to particulars on the basis of Hogan J's judgment.

Dogma is if you keep refusing to accept our arguments against man - made global warming.

Not exact matches

But, on the one hand, French opinion had gradually turned against the Algerian war and no longer accepted the government's arguments.

Kant set the problem with his argument against any knowledge of the Ding an sich, the thing in itself, and Schleiermacher represents the first great attempt to accept that turn and still talk about God in a meaningful way.

Given that so many good Protestant couples have accepted the creation, cryopreservation and disposal of early embryos, it may be almost impossible for an argument against ESCR to gain traction.

Even if one attempts by subtle arguments to show that somehow men really accept Christ in their very seeming rejection of him (because the Christian witness they encounter is either unworthy or incomplete and so on), there is still always the possibility of sin, of closing in on oneself against Christ.

So these «internal» arguments against free will theism are purely ad hominem, drawing upon ethical views that free will theists are thought to accept but which need not be shared by the process theist making the argument.

Many philosophers have accepted the assumption on which this objection rests — that there might have been nothing or that the existence of a world is cause for amazement — but it is Houston Craighead who has, in effect, aimed this line of argument against Hartshorne in a critique of the ontological argument (PS 1:9 - 24; RTE 33 - 37).

this blog is not working with me... I'll have to catch you guys on another post... it will not accept long post... This is my main point against the scientific method argument; it is consensus in the scientific community that most of our Universe is unseen.

First, discussion of Intelligent Design's argument against neo-Darwinism is out of place in a high - school science classroom because most scientists working in the area do not accept the Intelligent Design criticism of neo-Darwinism and because understanding the scientific issues involves sophisticated arguments far beyond the capacity of nonspecialists, let alone high - school students.

I posted this a week ago to my personal blog and intended to cross-post it here without too much delay, but I've just realized that I never got around to it.There's a particularly bad argument against those who accept the biblical prohibitions against same - sex sexual acts, and I think I've....

We're reluctant to accept arguments that cut against our political preferences.

José Mourinho declared the case brought against him for alleged tax fraud to be closed after he accepted the arguments put forward by Spain's Inland R -LRB-...)

Apart from the argument that we have a moral duty to help those who wish to come to this country (which you may or may not accept), there is an economic case in favour of immigration in that the economy benefits from the availability of cheap labour, and there is a case against in that growth in population especially in the crowded South - East creates a lot of pressure on infrastructure such as housing, transport, hospitals, and schools (and the growth in population is largely due to immigration).

Prior to this morning, the first, Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, appeared unlikely to prove explosive, while the second, Evenwel v. Abbott, held the potential for fireworks — but only if the justices were willing to accept an especially audacious argument which seems to cut against the explicit language of the Constitution.

Accepting the failures of his leadership as his alone against a tide of media hostility and so on, and not of his message and policies — not a wholly implausible argument for those inclined to believe — would give the left's next candidate a much clearer run, a sympathetic hearing and a wave of righteous indignation to ride.

While dismissing the arguments relating to the first two of those values, the Court accepted that the barrier raised against others by a veil concealing the face in public could undermine the notion of «living together».

That argument — that the conduct might be ugly but it isn't against the law, and everybody else does it — might sound familiar: it was what former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver's lawyers said when U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara indicted him on accepting kickbacks disguised as outside income.

In 2009 he said, when talking about climate change, that the «science is highly contentious, to say the least» and «the climate change argument is absolute crap», but did accept that precautionary action against it was a good idea.

But where treatment choice is in dispute, the usual situation places CAM practitioners against the rest of the medical personnel, in which case they need to have a good line of arguments and a good and widely accepted reputation.

To posit the argument against fracking, a highly likable Dustin Noble (John Krasinski) acts as a roving environmentalist plastering signs about the town condemning the fracking, even accepting a bribe from Global's agents and, rather than keeping quiet, using the money to buy more signs opposing the offers by Big Gas.

I've heard the «what if Amazon turns evil» argument a lot of times, but my reading of the situation is that the fear of Amazon some day abusing its power to force a bad deal on authors has to be weighed against the simple fact that publishers are currently forcing authors to accept bad deals.

Finally, consider the statement, «The trouble with being too open - minded is that your brains may fall out:» Such a proposition, startling and incongruous as it may seem, fits this assignment; it implies a causal relationship as part of an argument against the generally accepted positive standard of open - mindedness and tolerance.

I do not accept your arguments because they go on the contrary of what has been reported sometimes even on the headline of the article, and when asked for a source or proof you paraphrase the same point, post a passive - agrressive comment, or talk about your credentials as if somehow that alone invalidated the point being made against your claims.

These arguments are somewhat similiar to those used against Youtubers before it became an accepted thing.

A valuable short paper that has been accepted for publication in Geophysical Research Letters (subscription required) makes a strong case against presenting any argument about human - driven global warming that's based on short - term trends (a decade or so).

In all these writings i have seen your main argument against this, that you accept that the CO2 is dependent of temperature as we see in my writing, but you say that this oscillation would only last so short that we never would see bigger deviations from Antarctic curves.

I think Michael Criton has made the best argument and comparison to commonly accepted «truths» of the scientific community, that were later found to be incorrect; most recently the stomach ulcer causes actually discovered against the entire gastroenterological medical community.

Unless any of the many, many people who have argued against the conclusion that Jelbring's work is completely wrong and should have never been accepted in the first place wish to keep arguing, perhaps the more polite ones can concede in one last post and we can wrap this up and move on to N&Z, the «existence» of a real, live GHE, and maybe, just maybe, get to where the skeptical arguments on the list are much better informed and less likely to play fast and loose with the laws of nature or thermodynamics.

«Feedbacks» argument: Here Bart argues against low climate sensitivity estimates cited by NIPCC by simply stating that they are much lower than the estimates, which are» accepted» by IPCC or that can «satisfactorily» be modeled by the IPCC models.

These groups gladly accept Exxon's support, which enables them to keep churning out misleading reports, to flood newspaper op - ed pages with bizarre arguments against action to curb rampant carbon emissions, and to appear on right - wing TV and radio where they're invited by the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck to tick off blatant distortions of climate science without challenge by actual climate experts.

Because you can very well accept that climate change exists and still find arguments against climate action because the costs of doing something are so great.

A further argument that could be advanced, but has not been to date, is that the agreement by the employee to accept a recall request implicitly creates a visible past practice which can later be used against the employee to justify a subsequent lay - off.

Many of the greatest scientists fought against the tide of accepted wisdom until their observations, experiments, arguments and theories were accepted and, in turn, became the consensus.

«However, this case takes the argument a step further by accepting, as a generality, the potentiality or the application of TUPE against a foreign based transferee either in the EU or outside the EU.»

Even though the defendant based in Taiwan is served with all the legal documents, like the court notice and summons, in compliance with the foreign laws, the Taiwan court will accept the defendant's argument against the default foreign judgment that the legal documents are not served as per Taiwanese laws.

«If A's argument had been accepted, it would have created the potential for a flood of nominal damages claims against local authorities all of which would inevitably have been pursued entirely at significant public expense.»