Sentences with phrase «accepted as being self»

Third, it is accepted as being self - evident.»
Third, it is accepted as being self - evident.»
Third, it is accepted as being self - evident.

Not exact matches

Therefore, the key is not necessarily to immediately force people to act as if they're happy when they're devastated, but rather promote an overall culture and community that accepts failure as a means to self - improvement.
Self - acceptance also means accepting your income and success level as they are, she says.
As research shows, interpersonal warmth explains the self - fulfilling prophecy of anticipated acceptance; study participants who expected to be accepted were perceived as more likablAs research shows, interpersonal warmth explains the self - fulfilling prophecy of anticipated acceptance; study participants who expected to be accepted were perceived as more likablas more likable.
It is an ongoing battle to get clients accepted as the debt - to - income ratios we use here keep changing according to the type of client (employed / self - employed, home owner / tenant etc).
The problem is that instead of accepting reality understanding your true self you have to believe in a deity to keep that feeling of being special alive as an adult.
Personally, I feel that if there is a god, and he wants me to believe he exists, he can come over here and tell me himself, I don't accept the Bible as «proof» of anything, because it is self - contradictory and appears to be heavily influenced by the governing culture of the time.
Mankowski finds it odd that bishops should accept as self evident that the ministries of the Church, in service to the People of God, should be described as «power structures.»
The second is where most «atheists» can be found... unwilling to accept the logical consequence of their utterly meanigless lives as atheists, they cite humanity as being self - transcendent, in the end, this becomes a religion with themselves as its god — think Nietzsche.
Yall need to find a new tag line this thinking for ones self just do nt work, To Chose to accept Christ as your Savior is a very personnel choice, It has to come from you and you alone, A silent request for Christ to save your soul, No one made that decision for me.
As long as we define our relationships by what we shouldn't be doing, we're encouraging people to hide their shadow selves from each other and God as they worry about not being accepteAs long as we define our relationships by what we shouldn't be doing, we're encouraging people to hide their shadow selves from each other and God as they worry about not being accepteas we define our relationships by what we shouldn't be doing, we're encouraging people to hide their shadow selves from each other and God as they worry about not being accepteas they worry about not being accepted.
Adam's eagerness to snatch the prize of equality with God — the desire of Everyman to set himself up in the place of God as absolute master of a world which is really not his own, but God's — is replaced by the second Adam's total self - surrender: his obedience to the point of accepting the death of the Cross; death which paradoxically leads to life, whereas the consequence of Adam's self - glorification proved to be death.
Once we have grasped the decision in terms of which Jesus» self - hood is constituted, the repetition of his decision involves the accepting of his selfhood as one's own.
It expresses a situation in which a man's fundamental self - definition is ethical, or humanistic, or scholarly, or secular, but in which he secondarily accepts the designation of himself as Christian also.
The great «paradox of the cross,» for Mark as for Paul and many another, was the self - humiliation of the glorious, celestial «Son of Man» in accepting suffering and death for the sake of «many.»
This self love is sin.God never forced chaos on us.we gave in to satan's lies about evil being an inherent necessity.Jesus said he was the way, the truth and life.He was the life (love) that everyone craves for, he is the truth which meant that his love was our only need and he exposed the lies of satan that we could attain bliss on subordinating people to our cravings.Sinning people don't accept a God who requires us to renounce ourselves because they are not convinced of God's love being enough for them and they are afraid to destroy their identity and live for the Glory of God.So, upon death, these souls realize that the physical world was just a shadow of God's love (the nature, food etc) and their own lies (violence, self love etc) and realize that love is their only need.They pursue it from other soul beings but are hurt that there's only hate and self love.They are afraid to approach the light because they don't want to renounce their identity as they have not recognized God's love before.
Its boasted self - reliance virtually always capitulates at the point of accepting human support from family, friends, or physicians, though it usually fails to recognize that its self - sufficient logic is as much violated by human as it would be by divine assistance.
The whole point of Christianity is not to accept and affirm autonomous or self - created identities as ultimately determining of who someone is, but to define what it means to be a person in terms of Christian teaching.
Theologians interpret that to be a «test of faith» by God for Cain and Abel where Cain gave his offering in pride and self - righteousness while Abel gave his with faith and humbleness as a sinner; therefore, God accepted Abel's offering as opposed to Cain's.
If modern Christianity has patterned itself after Jesus, then the Jesus we present to the world is not the Jesus who rejected the offers of self - reliance, control over others, and glory before men, but is the «Jesus» who has accepted such values and now holds them up as virtues.
So the marriage contract or covenant means that each spouse undertakes to give his or her own self, and each undertakes to accept the self - gift of the other, as she or he actually is.
Though blacks» tutelage has not been entirely self - incurred, the link between liberation and enlightenment is just as real for us: the black nonviolent disobedient realizes his own freedom by accepting the constraints of universal moral laws, by maintaining civility under strong provocation even when others do not.
Comforting and all as invisible friends are, they don't hold a candle to accepting self responsibility and holding the pen to the script of one's own destiny.»
Indeed, it is precisely the Christian's life in the kenotic Word which impels him to accept and affirm a world in which God is dead as the realization in history of God's self - annihilation in Christ.
Once we grasp the radical Christian truth that a radically profane history is the inevitable consummation of an actual movement of the sacred into the profane, then we can be liberated from every preincarnate form of Spirit, and accept our destiny as an occasion for the realization in the immediacy of experience of the self - emptying or self - annihilation of the transcendent and primordial God in the passion and death of Christ.
We are forever putting conditions and qualifications on the love of God: «If you rid yourself of your racism, if you vote Democratic, if you accept Jesus as your savior, if...» Such conditional, achievement - oriented, self - made - men religion certainly doesn't need Jesus dying on the cross and rising from the dead to make itself plausible and reasonable in an achievement - oriented, you - get - what - you - deserve capitalistic culture.
the possibility of realizing the emancipatory impulse of feminism lies not in concretising and more fully defining the boundaries of «our bodies» through law, but in accepting «the self» as something that is negotiable and contestable.
The point is to be accepted as one's true self, not what anyone else believes they should be.
Only when people take courage to face fear, heal from past hurts, as as considerate of others as self, accepting differences where they are debatable and are motivated by love then shall we see less of this kind of thing.
Salvation means that the love of God accepts us as we are and enables us, not indifferently or self - righteously, but humbly, penitently, and with new dedication of will, to accept ourselves.
However, to have a stable, healthy relationship, one needs to have a healthy self - love and self - acceptance, which is psychologically possible only when one can accept one's sexuality as morally good and, in a Christian context, compatible with God's love.
What is strange, to me, is that when I show my true self as a proactive Christian man, I'm accepted by secular people and people of other faiths and rejected by... you guessed it... churchgoers.
COCU denominations will accept these challenges only as they realize that being baptized into Christ and the cross really does signify an abandonment of self and the acceptance of a new identity.
Why did we take the privilege of sacrificing him as an offering or were we repeating the crime of the Sons of Adam when Cain killed his brother in jealousy about some sacrifice offerings that were made and was accepted by God for Cain's brother but not to Cain him self?
The good news of their being accepted in spite of their guilt never reaches the laity and, as a result, they become mired in the processes of self - justification with its attendant moralism and self - righteousness.
Azariah who later became Bishop of Dornakal argued that the church in accepting the position of a communal political minority with special protection would become a static community and it would negate its self - understanding as standing for mission and service to the whole national community, that in any case the Indian church is not a single social or cultural community since it consists of people of diverse background, each of whom would have its own political struggle to wage in cooperation with the people of similar background in other religions; and therefore theologically and politically Christians should ask only for religious freedom for its mission and service to all people, not as a minority right, but as a human right (ref.
In accepting ourselves as accepted we participate in the self - affirmation of being - itself; we seek the sustaining power which undergirds and supports our courage to be in the face of the threat of non-being.
But in vain he struggles thus; the difficulty he stumbled against demands a breach with immediacy as a whole, and for that he has not sufficient self - reflection or ethical reflection; he has no consciousness of a self which is gained by the infinite abstraction from everything outward, this naked, abstract self (in contrast to the clothed self of immediacy) which is the first form of the infinite self and the forward impulse in the whole process whereby a self infinitely accepts its actual self with all its difficulties and advantages.
In this way the self - knowledge of man, the knower, is accepted as an essential part of the process of inquiry.
The problem with the critical tradition, from Reimarus to Bultmann and beyond, has been the interpretation of historical events within the methodology of the laboratory — as if the historical veracity of John's Gospel can be analysed while dogmatically refusing to accept the possibility of Jesus» miracles and divine self - knowledge.
And at yet another point, we are told that, although evangelicals can not accept all of what process theists mean when they say that the world is «God's body», there is a «striking parallel» between the process concept of «God's self - embodiment in a redeemed world» and «the biblical image of the church as the «Body of Christ»» (111).
The freedom to and from God as the origin and future of freedom, and freedom as a dialogical power of love are accomplished in the highest modality of these aspects: as freedom supported in personal love by God's own self - communication and which accepts God himself, so that the horizon and the object of the love that is made free to itself become identical.
God's call to us is to be so at one with the self we are, so complete in our own being, so satisfied to accept ourselves as we are, that we do not envy or resent the self that someone else is.
Even in the Catholic, and not only in the Protestant view of the relation between God and man the freedom of the latter as derived only from himself is guilty and imprisoned egoism; hence as far as he is concerned, this freedom refuses to accept God's self - communication and to let God be God.
To refuse to use one's own language is to refuse to accept one's self, one's words, and one's hearers as an occasion for God.
Niebuhr's theology is based on his doctrine of man as self - transcending yet finite and capable of evil in not accepting his finitude.
True, the free act by which God's self - communication is accepted is itself the gift of God and can only be realized as grace.
In most of the denominations there is still a considerable number of biblical literalists (self - styled conservatives but called fundamentalists by others) who refuse to accept the views of modern historical and textual scholarship as to the true meanings of the Bible.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z