Sentences with phrase «accepted by most of»

He added the reinsurance approach will be accepted by most of the insurers once the market picks up auto recall.

Excuses similar to «dog ate my essay» or «my hard disc crashed» will not be accepted by most of the tutor.

Such topics as abortions, capital punishment, freedom of speech, and cloning are not accepted by most of the tutors because a lot has been already published about these issues.

This has become accepted by most of us as the norm, but we aren't destined to spend our golden years trying to remember where we left the car keys.

And yet it is also, paradoxically, accepted by most of them.

Before many years went by, it became accepted by most of the medical establishment that death wasn't defined by a heart that could not be restarted, or lungs that could not breathe.

Not exact matches

Despite Gov. Ricardo Rosselló's optimistic promise of getting 100 percent power back by Christmas, most people have accepted that this will be a Navidad without lights.

«Today, most Warsaw residents, even if they may not think it's pretty, prefer to accept it as a local landmark and a «souvenir» of times gone by,» she said.

The discovery comes at a particularly sensitive time for merchants, not only because this is the busiest time of the year for most, when by some estimates U.S. retailers will notch $ 630 billion in sales, but also because most merchants are now in the process of switching over to terminals that accept chip cards, also known as EMV cards.

While most startups will be self - funded by its founders or the founder's immediate family and friends, some seek and accept third party «seed funding,» an investment at the very early stages of a company.

Most of them will not tolerate the kind of racism that was accepted as the norm by prior generations.

Its certification of businesses that are at least 51 percent owned, operated and managed by women, is accepted by more than 1,000 corporations representing America's most prestigious brands, in addition to many states, cities and other entities.

Tesla said that it has already accepted 115,000 preorders for the electric vehicle by the end of the March 31 event, with most of the preorders coming even before the Model 3 was officially unveiled.

Many of you have probably noted that most binary options brokers refuse to accept clients from the American market as they do not wish to be taxed by the U.S. authorities.

We surveyed a variety of studies about credit card spending and present some of the most widely accepted explanations as presented by leading experts.

The Bundesbank, the most hawkish of central banks, has signalled it would accept higher inflation in Germany as part of an economic rebalancing in the eurozone that would boost the international competitiveness of countries worst - hit by the region's debt crisis.

Similar borrowing in the private sector of the economy is both accepted and wholly approved even by the most eloquent, frequently vehement, opponents of the public deficit.»

«We received countless requests from the community to add support for litecoin, and we knew it was already accepted by Apple on the App Store, so for us it's a perfect fit and makes the most sense right now,» Anthony Di Iorio, founder and CEO of Jaxx, said in a statement.

Permit not, I beseech Thee, O Lord, that Thy Son should be any longer despised by unbelievers, but do Thous graciously accept the prayers of holy men and of the Church, the Spouse of Thy most holy Son, and be mindful of Thy mercy.

The only way to find compatibility in such a worldview is by accepting a religion with no authority on the most meaningful matters of human existence.»

To be chosen by God, and by accepting His gift of Faith, we are receiving the most precious gift in the world.

I believe in nationality; not in terms of race or of divine commissions for world conquest, but simply thus: mankind inevitably organizes itself in communities according to its geographical distribution; these communities by sharing a common history develop common characteristics and inspire local loyalty; the individual family develops most happily and fully when it accepts these natural limits.

Their bizarre theology rejects the most basic beliefs accepted by the majority of Christians.

This has been the most helpful response I've encountered since being attacked by the ugly side of Calvinism a few years ago (and being kicked out of church for refusing to repent of «my pride in believing that I accepted Jesus as my Savior»).

The result was a version of Christian origins that in many if not most points was at variance with the version accepted by the ordinary believer.

And while Christianity's highest and deepest implications may tax the brains and moral courage of the most fully developed personalities, they can also be accepted by the relatively simple and ungifted.

Upon careful analysis, at least ten such points become apparent: (1) Blake alone among Christian artists has created a whole mythology; (2) he was the first to discover the final loss of paradise, the first to acknowledge that innocence has been wholly swallowed up by experience; (3) no other Christian artist or seer has so fully directed his vision to history and experience; (4) to this day his is the only Christian vision that has openly or consistently accepted a totally fallen time and space as the paradoxical presence of eternity; (5) he stands alone among Christian artists in identifying the actual passion of sex as the most immediate epiphany of either a demonic or a redemptive «Energy,» just as he is the only Christian visionary who has envisioned the universal role of the female as both a redemptive and a destructive power; (6) his is the only Christian vision of the total kenotic movement of God or the Godhead; (7) he was the first Christian «atheist,» the first to unveil God as Satan; (8) he is the most Christocentric of Christian seers and artists; (9) only Blake has created a Christian vision of the full identity of Jesus with the individual human being (the «minute particular»); and (10) as the sole creator of a post-biblical Christian apocalypse, he has given Christendom its only vision of a total cosmic reversal of history.

The author argues that the United States ought to accept the provision for an International Criminal Court, as worked out in Rome in the summer of 1998 and agreed to by most of the nations participating in the discussions.

This is the most interesting point for you atheists, because there's no way to get out of this but accepting by faith the premise that not only God exists, but also is good and won't fool you.

But I very much doubt that there is any one view of omnipotence clearly accepted by most classical theists.

Theology is important, but formal analytical thought — the splendeur et misère of Roman Catholicism — is not the primary means by which most people experience, accept, or reject a religious faith.

It should not be overlooked that both the trinitarian and christological decisions of this period, decisions that have to do with the most foundational aspects of the Christian faith and have been accepted in subsequent ages with astonishing equanimity, were decisions undertaken by the church under the aegis of Empire.

As it is accepted that most of the ecclesiastical and scientific authorities, backed by the papacy, were wrong about Galileo.

The rapid rise and spread of Communism must be accepted by Christians as the most seriously challenging deviant form of the Judeo - Christian heritage, just as, in the eighth century, the rise of Islam came about because of the tendency for Christian Trinitarian doctrine to revert to polytheism, adding weight to Mohammed's call for a pure monotheism.

It is possible that they used Mark in a rather different form to that in which we possess it, or even in two different forms, but the simplest explanation, that they both used substantially our gospel of Mark, is by far the most probable, and is now generally accepted.

Following Jung's thought (without most of Jung's patriarchal biases) in seeing «masculine» and «feminine» components, he declared: «Only by accepting both the masculine and feminine principles, bringing them together, and harmonizing them within ourselves, will we be able to transcend the conditioning of our roles, and to express the whole range of our latent potential.»

If the survival of the Christian faith were dependent on the earth sitting still, Christianity would have most certainly perished sometime in the 18th century when the existence of a sun - centered solar system became widely accepted by the scientific community and the public.

Indeed, most cultures in human history have generated no such marvel as the modern scientific movement, and even in our own culture, scientifically oriented as it is supposed to be, most people accept the benefits of technology and use the vocabulary of science but do not in fact choose to abide by the disciplines that alone make scientific productivity possible.

One of the things I have respected most in Aida Rosa, principal of the elementary school P.S. 30, and the teachers that I talk with on her staff is that they look at children here as children, not as «distorted children,» not as «morally disabled children,» not as «quasi-children» who require a peculiar arsenal of reconstructive strategies and stick - and - carrot ideologies that wouldn't be accepted for one hour by the parents or the teachers of the upper middle class.

This, I believe, is one of the most misinterpreted books out of all those commonly accepted by most Christians to comprise the totality of scripture.

Those views are not new, but they are not accepted as true by most of us.

As it stands it comes near to being an anti-climax, and is saved from this only by the words of the unknown man, usually taken to be an angel (and this, incidentally, is the most difficult part of the story to accept as historical).

Basically, most of you believe that the worst possible person imaginable would still be saved by Jesus should he accept him as their savior with their dying breath.

The dream of the abolition of war is given us in the Bible, but the reason most Christians hesitate to accept that dream and act upon it comes also from the Bible, from all the wars that are recorded and celebrated by God's people, all the wars that are authorized and even commanded by God.

You are unable to accept a universe not created and regulated by god because those ideas have informed your imagination for most of your life... The trouble is you are living in that universe, so wrap your mind around it and deal with it.

The wonder of it has been obscured for most readers by the fact that it comes to them in their own language, hence is accepted, half unconsciously, almost as modern literature.

In most of the denominations there is still a considerable number of biblical literalists (self - styled conservatives but called fundamentalists by others) who refuse to accept the views of modern historical and textual scholarship as to the true meanings of the Bible.

Yet this was a most important oversimplification, for it made possible for the Jews to accept their fate as the just punishment of God, and to accept the Torah as the book by which they would live.

Those who are the most loving and accepting of their fellow man are always the first to be crucified and exploited by Fundamentalists!

By 1980, however, the somewhat chastened magazine acknowledged he was not: «God is making a comeback Most intriguingly, this is happening not among theologians or ordinary believers — most of whom never accepted for a moment that he was in any serious trouble — but in the crisp, intellectual circles of academic philosophers, where the consensus had long banished the Almighty from fruitful discourse.&raMost intriguingly, this is happening not among theologians or ordinary believers — most of whom never accepted for a moment that he was in any serious trouble — but in the crisp, intellectual circles of academic philosophers, where the consensus had long banished the Almighty from fruitful discourse.&ramost of whom never accepted for a moment that he was in any serious trouble — but in the crisp, intellectual circles of academic philosophers, where the consensus had long banished the Almighty from fruitful discourse.»