Nowadays, Global warming is
accepted by scientists as a fact.
These industries, their paid up politicians and the people that deny the facts
accepted by scientists around the world for the «Man made» effects on our climate have but one agenda: Keep the money flowing in no matter what!
It is now
accepted by scientists and economists that increasing CO2 emissions due to economic development will destroy the foundation of millions of livelihoods on the planet.
You've made yourself look foolish again here by trying to overturn a basic, well - documented and noncontroversial physical fact (the absorption spectrum of carbon dioxide)
accepted by scientists on both sides of this debate.
Her forecast that we are powerless to prevent major damage from climate change is
accepted by scientists but it is rare for such a frank admission from a politician.
Since «climate scientists» are not real scientists, they don't realize that Einstein's theorems were only
accepted by scientists following the confirmation of certain predictions made by his theorems; that all they have to do to earn a consensus of belief is demonstrate a confirmation of their predictions.
To say that the science beyond «global cooling» / «new ice age» in the 1970's was anywhere near as robust or
accepted by scientists in the field (as opposed to bored journalists and second tier science fiction authors) is simply untrue.
Darwin's theory is
accepted by scientists because it explains so much about the living world, but it has been the focus of cultural concern...» More...
Contrary to their portrayal in popular films, dinosaurs are now widely
accepted by scientists as having been covered in feathers, possibly in a range of colors, much like the colorful plumage of modern birds, which are a living dinosaur lineage.
Biological evolution is not only universally
accepted by all scientists in some form or other, but it is part of the common knowledge of nearly everybody who has had a secondary school education.
Not exact matches
To understand why Behe's argument is so uncontested in the realm of fact, and yet why so many
scientists find the concept of irreducible complexity not only difficult to
accept but even impossible to consider, we should start
by summarizing the modern understanding of Darwinism, as set out
by Richard Dawkins.
Some have stated that unless major reforms are implemented ecologically, that
by 2037, the earth may be unable to sustain life as we now have, with climate change now
accepted as fact, whereby
scientists (IPCC or Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) are now saying that they are 95 percent sure that global warming is man - made, using the words «extemely likely».
Evolution is totally
accepted by every true
scientist in the world and is a proven fact.
«Evolution, a foundational principle of modern biology, is supported
by overwhelming scientific evidence and is
accepted by the vast majority of
scientists.
The steady state hypothesis was a rationalization
by some
scientists who couldn't
accept the Big Bang and the conclusion that our observable universe had a beginning.
Even look at the big bang theory
accepted by most
scientist today.
I
accept Rorty's defense of the value of literature as a means of sensitizing us to the predicaments of life, but would expand upon it
by reiterating my original call for a truly interdisciplinary conversation, one that includes humanists and
scientists, theoreticians and practitioners, students and educators.
In a recent paper Rogers defines a person as a fluid process and potentiality «in rather sharp contrast to the relatively fixed, measurable, diagnosable, predictable concept of the person which is
accepted by psychologists and other social
scientists to judge
by their writings and working operations.»
In studying any particular field the
scientist theoretically commences
by accepting nothing as known with certainty.
As we read this history, the furor over stem cells was fueled
by numerous factors: the near - universal human desire for magic; patients» desperation in the face of illness and their hope for cures; the belief that biology can now do anything; the reluctance of
scientists to
accept any limits (particularly moral limits) on their research; the impact of big money from biotech stocks, patents, and federal funding; the willingness of America's elite class to use every means possible to discredit religion in general; and the need to protect the unlimited abortion license
by accepting no protections of unborn human life.
Well, every creation «
scientist» needs to gain scientific credibility
by publishing papers in refereed scientific journals and books and the sort of nonsense Dr Snelling publishes in Creation Ex Nihilo is unlikely to be
accepted in any credible scientific journal.
The ones I mentioned, as you probably know, are widely
accepted as the preferred explanation
by a large number of contemporary
scientists.
This does not mean that the content of revelation needs to pass the specific tests devised
by academically critical methods which generally
accept only those ideas that pass muster with
scientists.
This general point of view concerning psychic needs of hungers is widely
accepted by social
scientists.
We are often exhorted
by scientists and philosophers alike to
accept the material given to us
by sense perception as though it is the rock - bottom foundation of our knowledge of the physical world, Simultaneously we are told to refrain from coloring neutral sense data over with our subjective wishes and teleological desires.
By no means all
scientists today
accept this ideal of reductionism.
Eminent doctors,
scientists, professors and thinking men and women
accept it with the evidence from the New Testament written
by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
Evolution is
accepted almost universally
by scientists.
Many of the speakers, including many of the
scientists, starting with the very opening paper
by Cambridge palaeobiologist Simon Conway - Morris, were keen to emphasise above all that whilst
accepting fully the rectitude of the science of the biological theory of evolution (mutation with natural selection), yet a «totality of explanation it is not» (Conway - Morris's words).
«We are delighted that Jon has
accepted this position, which ensures that management of one of Mass Audubon's most mission - critical and identifiable programs will be overseen
by a
scientist of both impressive ability in the field and substantial research experience,» Director of Conservation Science Jeff Collins said.
Multiple other GOP lawmakers also cited theories that are not
accepted by mainstream climate
scientists, according to reports.
«There is no reason for such an appointment when there are
scientists of every political stripe who adhere to the scientific method, have the humility to
accept when they are wrong and would be willing to serve their country if asked
by an incoming president.»
In a study published recently in American Behavioral
Scientist, researchers at the University of Georgia, San Diego State University and Syracuse University found that consumers are becoming more
accepting of native advertisements, especially when they are sponsored
by a company with which the consumer has a strong relationship or if the advertisements provide information the consumer can use.
Using statistically modeled maps drawn from satellite data and other sources, U.S. Geological Survey
scientists have projected that the near - surface permafrost that presently underlies 38 percent of boreal and arctic Alaska would be reduced
by 16 to 24 percent
by the end of the 21st century under widely
accepted climate scenarios.
Fortunately, he and other conservative Christians are being challenged
by climate
scientist Katharine Hayhoe, who also happens to be an evangelical Christian on a crusade to demonstrate to her fellow believers why being a Christian is not in conflict with
accepting climate change.
Opponents of taking action on global warming will point to former Massachusetts governor and 2012 candidate for President Mitt Romney's recent statement that he
accepts the scientific view held
by the bulk of the world's climate
scientists that human activity is contributing to global warming.
In the introduction of the book, which ScienceInsider has reviewed, de Mattei criticizes
scientists for failing to
accept that the theory of evolution isn't supported
by evidence and for ideologically denying any metaphysical truth, starting with the existence of a God that created the Universe.
Finally and
by no means least importantly, the PhD dance competition has allowed me to come out of the closet and be fully
accepted as a dancing
scientist.
Other examples include Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman's studies of human reasoning, which show that humans frequently reason with unseen and persistent biases, and the work of Keller, Longino, and other feminist critics showing that
scientists are cognitively limited
by the ideologies
accepted in their wider cultures.
This has been well - established
by many
scientists working from many points of view and
accepted by virtually every leading scientific organization in the world.
«Although sleep
scientists have generally
accepted that the average sleep duration of Americans has been declining in parallel with our transformation to a frenetic 24 - hour society,» Quan wrote, «most sleep clinicians would consider those values indicative of sleep deprivation even
by current standards.»
It can even be inferred that science has not been
accepted by pop culture and
scientists have not entered the public's awareness.»
Getting more
scientists to
accept the animal claims
by Rogers» team will require more data, she says.
The
scientists» findings have been
accepted by the Astrophysical Journal Letters.
By studying how the rat body
accepts or rejects transplanted pancreas, skin, heart, kidney, or bone marrow,
scientists have helped medical doctors successfully perform life - saving transplants in human adults and children.
Although the new preprint archives as well as the general repository for biological research are still in their infancy compared to the fields of physics, and they have yet to be discovered
by many
scientists, they have already been acknowledged and
accepted by major research institutes and renowned journals.
The
scientists detailed their findings in a paper that was
accepted July 26
by the journal Physical Review E.
Scientists using CRISPR to edit pig organs so they'll be
accepted by human bodies think a breakthrough is coming that will end the organ - donation waiting list.
A new study led
by Western University's all - star cosmochemist Audrey Bouvier proves that the Earth and other planetary objects formed in the early years of the Solar System share similar chemical origins — a finding at odds with
accepted wisdom held
by scientists for decades.
Once
accepted as participants of a Lindau Meeting, young
scientists are supported in all organisational matters
by the executive secretariat of the Council.