Sentences with phrase «accepted ideas with»

Darwin, like the prophet Isaiah, attempted to enlarge awareness of God's greatness by rejecting a naïve identification of commonly accepted ideas with the order he established.

Not exact matches

«The idea of working five days a week with two - day weekends and a few weeks of annual holiday is just something people accept,» he writes.

Ponzo concurs, noting entrepreneurship's rise as a «pervasive and accepted» career option has led to more MBAs entering Columbia with either an already established business or «fleshed - out ideas.»

Zenios accepted 70 students with ideas for a new product or service that addressed a customer pain point.

Customers can accept the idea of dealing with your assistant while you're on vacation.

Often, it can be better to look for incremental steps forward, or else to try to cross-pollinate two (or more) accepted ideas or insights — say a proven business model from one industry and a market with which the entrepreneur has familiarity.

With no handy algorithm to identify good ideas, innovative companies have to accept that with every great, useful, idea, there will be many more that fall aWith no handy algorithm to identify good ideas, innovative companies have to accept that with every great, useful, idea, there will be many more that fall awith every great, useful, idea, there will be many more that fall away.

We'll be accepting applications to work with us through our website — no idea Read more about 52businesses Announcing New Yearlong Project — A New Business Every Month!

«It's a breath of fresh air to come into a community with business ideas and have them accepted, and they work with you to find ways to make it happen.»

Most investors accept the idea that seasonal trends in commodities exist and are also quite open - minded with respect to recurring phenomena such as the year - end rally in stock indexes.

A lot of these companies are private; there's a company in Russia that's toying with the idea of accepting Bitcoin and making it available to buy and sell.

I say the real hypocrites are the ones who say they are tolerant, open minded, and enlightened, yet shut their mind to ideas that are opposite theirs and attack with malice those who accept Christianity.

In short, the irreducible complexity of molecular systems is controversial among molecular biologists when it is presented as an idea with philosophical consequences, and tacitly accepted as reality when it remains in the world of innocent fact.

Figures showed 61 per cent of Christians agree with ideas rooted in New Spirituality, a little more than half resonate with postmodernist views, 36 per cent accept views associated with Marxism and a third believe ideas based on secularism.

They teach their clients to do the same and then to substitute rational, self - accepting ideas for dealing with the inevitable frustrations, which occur in everyone's life in this very imperfect world.

Preaching is more than a process of transmitting ideas about Christian creed, cult, and conduct with the expectation that these ideas will be understood, accepted, and translated into action.

So goes the first line of argument that leads Christians to accept the idea of violence and to associate themselves with violent movements.

If this positive view of celibacy is conveyed, «then we shall see the most distinguished among the younger generation fired up with the inspiration to feed the flock of God... and their deep hearts will grasp the whole idea of the Church and accept it into themselves as a living power» (p73).

He accepted the suffering, he lived with it, he searched it, and he found its costly meaning for him — that he was to live as one called under God — to live as a lonely man — to live for an idea.

First, in our culture with its tradition of voluntaristic moralism it is difficult for people to accept the idea that an individual is not personally responsible for having a neurosis and yet is responsible to society for getting help, i.e., for becoming more responsible.

They can't come to terms with the idea that there may actually be nothing after we die so they latch on to a belief that gives them comfort... belief in an afterlife, eternity or any version of «god» is nothing more than a coping mechanism for those who can't accept that we are in fact finite creatures that are born, live, and die and are not meant or destined to exist for eternity.

I do accept as true with all the ideas you have introduced for your post.

Even if you accept the idea that a person can take end - of - life pills (death with dignity or whatever), it is impossible to stay robust and in your prime.

The method which retains constant reference to experience contrasts sharply with the method of authority, under which ideas are accepted on the basis of the prestige of a person or institution.

The whole point of these lessons we're supposed to learn is the idea that one day we become fathers, that we will grow up and have the same knowledge and experience of our fathers, sometimes more than but in terms of our relationship with god, we're supposed to accept that we're eternally children, that as much as we learn, grow and generally build upon past knowledge, we'll never attain the level of understanding or power that god has, this being is on a completely different level.

Although many churches refused to accept the sculpture because they didn't agree that Jesus was a homeless person, Rev Alistair Duncan from St Georges Tron told Premier the church welcomed the idea with open arms.

Take any traditional objection to accepting the old Platonic analogy of God as the World Soul and it can be shown that the objection stands or falls with aspects of a tradition which philosophy has been moving away from since the middle ages — for instance ideas of sheer infinity, sheer immutability, also what is usually meant by omnipotence.

These differences stem mainly from the fact that Jesus apparently accepted, though with some modifications, the apocalyptic ideas current in his time.

While these scientific ideas, insofar as they are accepted as true, disprove false metaphysical views, they can not prove process theology's view, but they can show that all the known empirical evidence is consistent with it.

I suppose that if supporting my arguments with what I consider to be reliable evidence is the limitation of ideas in your view, then I'm willing to accept that.

The idea of writing a story about a man who had no faith and then suddenly was faced with accepting something more powerful than myself, followed by miracle after miracle — should certainly help someone else.

The Calvinists on the other hand have their particular bias, precedence, of man having no inherent - free - will capacity to accept or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, teachings, promises and gifts that they interpret John 6:25 - 71 with — which interpretation is consistent with their precedence and consistent with their ideas of unconditional election and irresistible grace.

Imagine what a blessing it would be for the Church, were a large and vital group of reformed Catholic traditionalists — freed from harmful ideas and fully accepting Vatican II (rightly interpreted) and the Novus Ordo — were to fully reconcile with the Church, and not do anything to betray the Vatican's good faith, once re-united.

In the 17th century, the ideas of the Reformation were spreading throughout the world and the Church did not accept very graciously the new scientific ideas that mixed themselves with God and religion.

The Arminians have their particular bias, precedence, that initially fallen man did not have inherent - free - will capacity to accept or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, teachings, promises and gifts that they interpret John 6:25 - 71 with — which interpretation is consistent with their precedence and consistent with their idea of universal prevenient grace that gave all of fallen mankind a free will capacity (at some time after the fall) to accept or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, teachings, promises and gifts.

Perhaps EMS was not familiar with the ideas of a number of prominent theologians who accept class struggle as a fact and as a tool for analysis.

It was exciting to see the group grasp the idea that they were faced with two options: either try to keep the whole law (which was impossible) or accept justification by faith in Jesus.

You are unable to accept a universe not created and regulated by god because those ideas have informed your imagination for most of your life... The trouble is you are living in that universe, so wrap your mind around it and deal with it.

In the first case, individuals attempt (or are counseled) to not accept the reality of their sexual orientation (the idea that «there are no homosexual people — just heterosexual people with a homosexual problem»).

Historians have uncritically accepted the idea that the early colonies, the young states and the «wild West» were awash with guns.

Both in thinking of the context in which we work in the Church and of the goal we pursue, it seems easy to accept and propagate the idea that the last reality with which we are concerned is the Church itself, and that the summary commandment we obey is to love Christianity with heart, soul, mind and strength.

If I accept the idea that God is Omniscient, Omnipotent and Omnipresent, shouldn't I then accept the idea He could create the world and the universe and all that is in it with athought?

To begin with, the idea that the poor are closer to God is not widely accepted in America.

Either we must accept the idea that Christianity, to some degree, seems to align itself with such violence or we must assume that hundreds of apparently faithful Christians were deceived by a dangerous con man.

This does not mean that the content of revelation needs to pass the specific tests devised by academically critical methods which generally accept only those ideas that pass muster with scientists.

Since he was not so good at fantasy, he borrowed story ideas from existing stories, peppered them with the truths he wished to convey, and released them to people who would not have accepted the plain unvarnished truth.

We have a natural revulsion to the idea of checking people's BMI before accepting them into the Church, especially when obesity is not necessarily reflective of gluttony (often, in this country, it is a result of poverty), and when we know from our own experiences or the experiences of those we love that an unhealthy weight can result from a variety of factors — from genetics to psychological components — and when some of our favorite people in the world (or when we ourselves) wrestle with a complicated relationship with food, whether it's through overeating or under - eating.

Judgment went with it, and came to be thought of as an antiquated Old Testament idea, which we did not need any longer to accept.

Further, one should accept the idea of two boys wrestling because there lacks a biblical Christian principle that two boys should treat each other with respect and dignity, but according to a biblical Christian principle, a boy should treat a girl with respect and dignity.

Too many have accepted the popular «neo-orthodox» idea that contemplation and mysticism have no place in the Christian life; on the contrary, they have a real place and an important one; and for those who may be called by God to this particular mode of communion with him, there is a great blessing and a wonderful gift.