But we also recognize the right and necessity for the state to limit freedom when its exercise harms other people, infringes upon their rights, or offends
accepted moral principles.
This strong ethical and moral responsibility is derivable both from the universally
accepted moral principles including the widely accepted golden rule which requires people to treat others as they wish to be treated, and international law including, but not limited to the «no harm» rule which is a widely recognized principle of customary international law whereby a State is duty - bound to prevent, reduce and control the risk of environmental harm to other states and a rule agreed to by all nations in the preamble to the UNFCCC, the «polluter - pays principle» agreed to by almost all nations in the 1992 Rio Declaration, human rights law which requires nations to assure that their citizens enjoy human rights, and many other legal theories including tort law.
This strong ethical and moral responsibility is derivable both from the universally
accepted moral principles including the widely accepted golden rule which requires people to treat others as they wish to be treated, and international law including, but not limited to: (a) the «no harm» rule which is a widely recognized principle of customary international law whereby a State is duty - bound to prevent, reduce and control the risk of environmental harm to other states, and a rule agreed to by all nations in the preamble to the UNFCCC, (b) the «polluter - pays principle» agreed to by almost all nations in the 1992 Rio Declaration, (c) human rights law which requires nations to assure that their citizens enjoy human rights, and (d) many other legal theories including tort law.
Not exact matches
This formative
principle presupposes that
moral claims can be
accepted or contested because they can be valid or invalid and, thereby, presupposes the possibility of valid substantive prescriptions.
Along the same lines, Sapontzis argues that animals» intentional and sincere, kind and courageous actions are
moral actions, for they accord with
accepted moral norms, and we do not require demonstrations of
moral principle in everyday human
moral practice (AAMB 51 - 2).
Rather than
accept the burden of complicated
moral decisions, to which they must apply critical thinking and rational inquiry, they turn off their mental faculty and
accept as true and infallible a set of
principles that we developed in the very infancy of our civilization.
Once people agreed to
accept money as the medium of exchange, the accumulation of property was in
principle without any
moral limit.
Jewish values won't
accept sodomite couples raising children as parents, Jewish values will always keep what God has taught to be done; Jewish values go hand by hand with
moral, with integrity, dignity, and solid
principles, all of them given by God.
Natural law reasoning helps deepen this altogether proper obedience by illuminating the rational basis for
moral principles accepted on authority.
Of course Catholic
moral theology has always known that there are concrete
moral situations in which the application of universal
principles leads to no certain, generally
accepted and theoretically unambiguous results.
Basic differences between Mill and Hartshorne are to be found, not in their
principles of morality, but in the reasons each offers for
accepting a utilitarian
moral theory.
Geers creates work that aims to disrupt commonly
accepted moral codes and
principles.