Sentences with phrase «accepted rules do»

Not exact matches

If your customer, as a rule, does not pay vendors in less than 60 days, then prepare to accept that — don't start harassing the customer just because your terms are net 30.

Don't expect the IRS to accept a defense based only on the so - called valuation rules of thumb, the industry guidelines that sometimes appear in textbooks or industry newsletters.

Last year, the figure was 333,000, of which 184,000 came from the E.U. Even if you accept, as most do, that immigration has expanded the tax base and kept the price of both food and services down, the influx — for which there is no end in sight — is changing the face of the country too fast for the population to stomach, and the E.U.'s rules on free movement of labor are an easy target.

After a while, you begin to just accept that the rules don't apply to your boss.

China's plan involves very different strings than the postwar American checks did: no interest in promoting the rule of law, free markets, and (US - led) global standards, but a rather simple «buy from Chinese state owned corporations, accept Chinese currency, employ Chinese standards.»

Holder argued the panel's narrow ruling on technical grounds did not mean Canada and the U.S. could bully Europeans into accepting GM food.

While Mr. Levitt did not succeed in splitting auditing from consulting, the industry accepted strict new ethics rules and limits on the audit business.

Under Suncorp's new rules, it will no longer accept investment loan applications for apartments that do not have a minimum deposit of at least 20 per cent.

«You don't want to exclude these products from the agreement, so in order to include them, you design rules of origin that will define how finished products can be accepted and get the benefit of the lower tariff or no tariff,» says Christian Sivière, a trade consultant with Solimpex.

Although disliking Jews go further back, such as their exile, one of the reasons is that the Pope made a rule that Christians can't loan money (but accepting a loan is ok) so Jews end up taking the job and so long as things are going well, people probably like jews because they received money (though they probably didn't like paying them back with interest).

If a group of people choose to live by a certain set of rules and actually don't mind, then their beliefs should be respected as we would want our beliefs to be accepted and respected as well.

If Congress decides that any institution that accepts the tax breaks has to play by Congress» rules, again, I don't see how «rights» to «private property» are «obviously» violated.

These people can't accept that reality because it would mean that they have no reason to oppose homosexuality other than a completely arbitrary rule that divides humanity into two different classes without any real reason to do so.

I accept that I do not know everything there is to know so can not rule out the possibility of a God.

If the Catholic hospitals don't want to follow the federal rules, they can stop accepting federal money.

The rest of the time, the average Christian can do pretty well in their life simply by following a few generally accepted spiritual heath rules:

@Dunk, Morality doesn't have meaning beyond how if effects people, the rules we agree on and accept as a society will mean nothing when catastrophic even or the sun expanding wipes us off the star map; but why isn't it's effect on mankind enough?

In his book In Praise of Play, Robert Neale discusses in detail these perversions of play: when peace is «inaction»; when freedom is bondage to one need in our psyche which is dominant; when delight is turned into a work agenda; when illusion is maintained at the expense of other needs and is a form of mental illness; when the story is believed, the time limits ignored, and pretending becomes pretension; when a game is played at the expense of others, breaking the rules; when the risk of adventure is perverted and the gamble removed or fatalistically accepted; or when play is done in secret.

The quest for total consensus is an illusion, and indeed there is no reason to accept majority rule in such a matter if the majority does not share one's premises.

Your god does not rule here, therefore, your god's rules do not apply unless we each chose to accept them.

That is the point you are bringing up in your take regarding the «Golden Rule», that others have to accept whatever it is you want to do.

In challenging process theology to state explicitly that God sides with the oppressed, and to do so in a way that does not rule out the possibility of righteous counterviolence, I understand Jones to be challenging process theology to explicate the social - ethical consequences of accepting certain metaphysical truths in order that black theology might measure its ethical content against the needs of the struggle for liberation.

The only widely accepted prohibition during the first Jihad was to not murder the «people of the book», that would be Jews and Christians, but all of the people of the book would have to under Muslim rule and could not do anything against Islam.

so what is God gonna do... choose one people... well he did and now the rules have changed and according to Christians... God's chosen are all going to hell because they refuse to accept Christ.

What the New Testament does do is to portray the gracious message of an open access to that same God whose depth of accepting love is seen on a cross and whose presence in the life of that crucified one is designed to call forth from us the same awe, reverence, and obedience to those rules of life through which we find the fullness of life, the depth of love, and the meaning of our own humanity.

While we all should and do tolerate and accept each others right to worship, the majority should rule, just as in voting, as in democracy and in life.

If our common sense can accept this for physical forces then surely it does not rule this out for spiritual forces and entities.

«WE HAVE THE VICTORY» For those struggling with thoughts of unforgiveness and attacks on the mind especially deceiving thoughts and doubts these are from satan in the word they are called fiery darts we are to quench those darts by faith so we need to read the word and believe that Gods word is true.We also have the victory over these thoughts because when we accept Jesus the holy spirit dwells within us so satan does nt have authority over us he can not rule what belongs to God he can only deceive.We can not defeat the enemy in our strength we need the holy spirit when we try and overcome him in our strength we struggle especially with our thoughs and in the area of sin.If you are having evil thoughts or doubts commit your way unto the Lord and let him fight your battle.Tell the enemy he has no authority over you that you are under the covering of Jesus Christ and when you have doubts memorise verses on faith ie greater is he that is in me than he that is in the world.The holy spirit is just like Jesus talk to him be friends with him he helps us to live like Christ and gives us the power to do it.We are overcomers more than conquerers through Christ who strengthens us.brentnz

Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result

It is very frustrating for them when we don't accept their control and rules.

You do realize that's accepted culturally in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and other Islamic countries ruled by Sharia.

In this context it does not matter how we react to this word - event, whether we accept it as pointing to God himself or reject it in desperate fury, because as part of the world of language it wants to force us, who are part of the world, to confront the whole of the world as well as ourselves without being the whole or being able to rule it.

If euthanasia ever does becomes generally accepted — as it is now in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Canada — under the Emanuel / Stahl rule, dissenting physicians would be required to participate in homicide.

@ dot: why would anyone accept the «rules» of something they don't aknowledge as being real?

Just one more thing why would anyone who does not believe in youe make believe god accept that fantasies rules?

but you want the Golden Rule to mean something it doesn't: namely, «accept whatever i accept.»

We need to live the Gospel and share the Gospel — as opposed to follow some rules and threaten death and destruction if they don't «accept» Jesus.

The report states that City don't think that Wenger will accept a deal unless they offer a player in return to appease the fans, and most pundits thought that Sergio Aguero would have been the most likely to move the other way, but that rumour seems to have been discounted, although we couldn't rule out it coming back if Arsenal still refuse to countenance a deal including Sterling.

We do know the rules, though, and have to accept it when, say, a goal we really wanted is ruled offside correctly, as Mustafi's header against Chelsea was this weekend.

You have to accept the way it is and, contrary to whether it breaks the rules or it doesn't, it happens.

I lost the game, I accept that, but I can't accept when the referee doesn't follow the rules.

The analogy with the ruling elite is a good one (but I don't accept this elite is solely made up of bankers, lol), and I think it points to the worst aspect of the current regime at Arsenal, that they are able to pay themselves world - class salaries whilst serving up a substandard product at world - leading prices.

I can accept the booking as he was breaking the rules (if the card was for infringement) but I still think fuchs should have been booked for what he did.

«Some clubs are paying or they don't buy because they don't accept the numbers that are now ruling the market, or to do it they have to go [to] the same levels and for me that's what worries me a little bit because now we speak about # 30 million, # 40 million, # 50 million in such an easy way,» said the United manager.

We can slowly stretch the «rules» of love, which we've already been doing; we've accepted interracial love and same - sex love.

My number one rule was to never give my children an option to discuss or refuse to do anything I couldn't accept — and, that leaves a lot of open choices for the child to practice reasoning and compromise.

The fact that babies can, will and do pee in the pool seems to be a universally accepted exception to the «Ool Rule» (as in, Please keep the «P» out our of pool).

However, by 14 h Carles Puigdemont has called for «democratic opposition» to direct rule from Madrid, meaning that he does not accept the takeover.

To explain it further: Dublin agreement allows them to do that, but the rule of sovereignity does not allow them to force the OUTCOME (that is accepting all migrants as refugees regardless of their true status) on other EU Member States.

Third, smaller markets have to accept the rules set by larger markets if they do not want to put their firms at a competitive disadvantage.