In Lord Simon's opinion, such an interpretation was borne out by the purpose of the legal rule, ie «that reasonable people may venture out in public without the risk of outrage to certain minimum
accepted standards of decency».
Not exact matches
The Board has written that the game was refused classification as one that depicts «matters
of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the
standards of morality,
decency and propriety generally
accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified.»
«depict, express or otherwise deal with matters
of sex, drug misuse or addiction, crime, cruelty, violence or revolting or abhorrent phenomena in such a way that they offend against the
standards of morality,
decency and propriety generally
accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that they should not be classified.»
The report states this is «offensive or abhorrent in such a way that it offends against the
standards of morality,
decency and propriety generally
accepted by reasonable adults to the extent that it should not be classified.»