A non-believer may have a better chance being
accepted than a believer like me.
Not exact matches
These conversations can be frustrating for sure, and I'm only now beginning to
accept the fact that I can't drag unwavering
believers along on my journey any more
than they can drag me along on theirs.
2) Where's your source for your number «1 out of a thousand», because its more commonly
accepted that most atheists study and reflect on spirituality far more
than «
believers».
If you're a
believer in the 5 - second rule, you've
accepted the popular wisdom that it takes longer
than that for germs to transfer from the floor to a dropped piece of food.
Like the others above, I am a firm
believer that no one cares more about your investments
than yourself... so I prefer to
accept full responsibility for my investment decisions
than to rely on someone else.
Once again, a group of
believers (Leviticus) claims that a strong change is discernable in some aspect of the AGW mythos, yet when the Leviticus paper is actually read, it is clear that as Pielke, Sr. points out, OHC is in reality not doing what is predicted, is significantly lower
than the AGW prediction, and that Leviticus offers no mechanism to move this heat fromthe surface to the depths, unless one
accepts arm waving as the method of moving heat content.
I think the reason those who, rather
than being «
believers»,
accept the massive, overwhelming amount of evidence behind man - made global warming, say to «ignore the skeptic scientists» is because those scientists have been debunked and proven wrong over and over and over and over and over.