Sentences with phrase «accepted the facts there»

People who believe are weak minded and can not accept the fact there is not reason for anything, no loving omnipotent being who cares or anything after death.

Not exact matches

«What it has to do with is the fact that the person is not humble enough to accept responsibility when things go wrong, accept that there might be better ways to do things, and they just have a closed mind,» says Jocko Willink, coauthor of Extreme Ownership: How U.S. Navy SEALs Lead and Win.

Whilst accepting that there is two sides to every argument / position describing climate change as a big hoax and the depiction of a bleak medieval style future is not responsible analysis of the facts.

Just as jujitsu teaches practitioners to channel an opponent's energy to achieve their goals, running a business during the holidays requires accepting the fact that there will be a certain amount of shifted focus and figuring out how to use it for the good of the company.

If you accept this premise that there can be a meaningful difference based on method of origination of a token based on work vs. based on payment of money, then it raises more questions such as how would the above examples all be treated by the SEC on a facts and circumstances basis, and on down the rap sheet.

No such proof can ever be absolute (e.g., there is no 100 % proof that we exist, the world is flat, or the solar system is helio - centric... but there is such tremendous weight of evidence as perceived by our 5 senses and logic these are accepted as fact and truth).

It's the 0.001 % of them who hold rallies, blow themselves up, and go on television / radio (in the case of Fox News, start their own network) who HATE the fact that there are those of us out there who do not accept the idea of God or Jesus or Allah and think it is unacceptable.

I already had to accept the facts that there is no Santa and no tooth fairy.

To demonstrate that there is a God to individuals that discard the Bible and the notion of a God, it has to be approached from a different prospective, from their viewpoint, what they will accept and not what you believe as fact, based on the Bible.

If you were a real Christian you would know Christs words speak for themselves and the fact that he didn't take the sword away and turn it into a pruning shear right then and there does not mean he was saying «I mean all this stuff is for later after I come back and kill all the evil people and those who haven't accepted me as their savior so you won't have to fear anyone so you can finally give up your guns and weapons of war...» You disgust me chad.

The assumption behind the Ostpolitik was that the Eastern bloc would always be there and so had to be accepted as apermanent fact of life: the future Pope John Paul II already knew that it must not be accepted as a fact of life, and that it was itself vulnerable, especially to the Catholic Church.

They do not have to believe or agree but they do have to accept the fact that there are others out there with different beliefs and respect the fact that, that is what they believe.

All we say is that given that there is no physical evidence for your god (no fossil records, no records outside of the buybull), we refuse to accept it as fact.

There have been plenty of wars fought over a wide range of reasons, not all wars are over religion, when are you athiests going to get off of your high horse and accept the fact that everyone, religious and non religious cause violence at some time.

Finally, the Maryknoll religious says, while the church perhaps did not approve the Crusades, the two world wars, the Korean war, or today's Vietnam war, the fact that it did not condemn them «shows that it accepts the idea that there can be a just war, and that men might sometimes be right in taking up arms to defend themselves.»

Can we not accept the suggestion that there are facts, even «scientific» facts, which we can never know because we are incapable of understanding them?

There is a certain inconsistency in the fact that persons who accept without question the presence of God in the physical universe so often wonder if there is any reality in it when the processes of prayer are examThere is a certain inconsistency in the fact that persons who accept without question the presence of God in the physical universe so often wonder if there is any reality in it when the processes of prayer are examthere is any reality in it when the processes of prayer are examined.

There can be little question that Whitehead himself accepted this; he believed that the tenderness, sympathy, and love which were shown in Jesus» life and death are in fact the disclosure of the nature of the Divine Reality who is the chief — although not the only — principle of explanation for all that has been, is, and will be.

The fact is according to the Bible, there are people in Heaven who did not accept Jesus as thier savior, because He had not died yet.

They can't come to terms with the idea that there may actually be nothing after we die so they latch on to a belief that gives them comfort... belief in an afterlife, eternity or any version of «god» is nothing more than a coping mechanism for those who can't accept that we are in fact finite creatures that are born, live, and die and are not meant or destined to exist for eternity.

The world of man in which his action is placed, being man - made, can not simply be accepted as nature was in former times, even where it was mysterious, for even there its incomprehensibility appeared as something divinely matter of fact.

The fact that so many believe does not make the story true, it merely means that those believing the story seriously don't care if there is evidence to support it, they merely accept it on faith (belief without evidence).

There are various strategies that can be adopted regarding the use of money, but first you must be willing to accept the fact that all that you have is ultimately God's, that there are alternative uses for your money, that your decision on how to spend $ 100 can literally be a life or death decision for a starving child half a world There are various strategies that can be adopted regarding the use of money, but first you must be willing to accept the fact that all that you have is ultimately God's, that there are alternative uses for your money, that your decision on how to spend $ 100 can literally be a life or death decision for a starving child half a world there are alternative uses for your money, that your decision on how to spend $ 100 can literally be a life or death decision for a starving child half a world away.

We found out they are there through science and now it's fact and accepted.

Contra the accepted view, there has in fact been no worsening of income distribution.

I believe there is very real persecution (sometimes) in the USA but most of us haven't seen it... In fact, sometimes I think we tend to be the persecutors when we try to force our beliefs on others or shun others who will not accept our beliefs.

There has been nothing new ever since and deists need to join civilization and accept facts as facts.

In accepting our limits, we accept the fact that there may be suffering which could be relieved but ought not.

Philosophy (which means love of wisdom) I thought it wise to accept the fact that there is someone greater than I that could have made all that has happened in the natural course of events.

We base what we accept as fact off of the evidence and we do not claim to have an answer when there isn't one to be had.

In past ages some have talked as if there were a gulf between these two; and in reaction from that utter separation, some have talked as if there were no distinction between them, The fact is that throughout Christian history, whatever may have been the theory accepted as valid, there has been precisely such a distinction.

All knowledge about death does not alter the fact that death is not a meaningful part of life and that there is nothing for us to do but to accept the fact of death; hence as far as our life is concerned, defeat.5

In fact, since there can never be true uniformity in all things, the only way to achieve unity is to recognize, accept, and celebrate our diversity.

The easy dismissal of death, or the assertion that «for those who believe, there is no death», is taken to be, what it often is, an easy evasion of the dread reality itself — escapism, childish refusal to face facts, and above all (in our special interest) unwillingness to accept our human mortality.

, for many atheists too, I'd say «Accept the fact that there are areas of belief in your life.»

There is every reason to accept them as authentic; their very vividness, the fact that the tradition has misunderstood the first two (v. 33 makes them examples of self - denial) and the extreme unlikelihood of anyone but Jesus using a Zealot assassin as an example (cf. the Labour Racketeer!)

So as you said «Accept the fact that there are areas of unbelief in your life.»

There are, in fact, many Christian churches who fully accept gay couples for who they are, some of them performing marriages of gays.

I find it both interesting and entertaining that there are so many theories about the creation of the universe that people just accept as a fact without substanitive proof.

Because of this he is better able to accept the fact that there are many people he can not help or whom he can help only in very limited ways, no matter how hard he tries.

Finally, there is cognitive surrender, in which, in Berger's terms, «one simply accepts the fact that the majority is right, then adapts oneself to that point of view.»

This is no slight problem in view of the fact that there is bad theology in many of the hymns, and the Apostle's Creed, along with great eternally true affirmations, declares belief in such matters as the resurrection of the body, which few people who say it now accept.

So thrive in your ego or just accept the simple facts that there are other powers than yourself and that you can use their leverage for your own «salvation» be it as influential role - models or food for thought.

The second you accept the fact that others feel about YOUR god - idea the way you feel about Allah / Zeus / Poseidon / etc, then the efficacy of Pascal's Wager goes out the window, because there are SO MANY god - ideas to try to believe, and many of them contradict one another... short of George Orwell's «1984» concept of «DoubleThink».

All this being granted, Father Vagaggini said, it would appear that one can accept a further hypothesis: There is nothing to deny the fact that in the non-Christian religions even after Jesus Christ there have been elements, in greater or lesser number — whether of a ritualistic, institutional or doctrinal nature — with a positive value for salvation, in the sense that God makes use of them to effect the salvation of those persons of sincere faith who belong to these religThere is nothing to deny the fact that in the non-Christian religions even after Jesus Christ there have been elements, in greater or lesser number — whether of a ritualistic, institutional or doctrinal nature — with a positive value for salvation, in the sense that God makes use of them to effect the salvation of those persons of sincere faith who belong to these religthere have been elements, in greater or lesser number — whether of a ritualistic, institutional or doctrinal nature — with a positive value for salvation, in the sense that God makes use of them to effect the salvation of those persons of sincere faith who belong to these religions.

There is none, so accept that and don't try to dishonestly frame everything you say as if it were fact.

If indeed there were significant new findings, broadly accepted by leading New Testament scholars, concerning the historical facts about what Jesus taught, such findings would indeed be newsworthy.

I know there are many scientists, Christian and non-Christian, who do not accept evolution as fact.

Of course there are many Religious Right advocates that do not accept historic or scientific facts and believe in Creationism over proven Evolution, believe the earth is 5000 years old instead of Billions reguardless of the fossil and rock record.

The fact you profess with such gusto that you are a christian and a creationist says that no matter how much evidence to the contrary of your beliefs is made available (and there is already volumes of information) you will never accept truth b / c you have been engrained and programmed to believe one set of precepts and only that set.