Sentences with phrase «accepted the rule as»

You will accept this ruling as accurate, absolute, and superseding of all municipal, state, and federal rulings.

Not exact matches

As mentioned above, financial statements are produced by companies for the benefit of shareholders, and are prepared in accordance to sets of accounting rules (i.e. International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, in Canada, and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or GAAP, in the U.S.) These rules differ greatly from those used to calculate corporate income taxes owing.

Under the new rules, only cats and dogs will be «accepted as PetSafe» — and not all breeds, either.

If your customer, as a rule, does not pay vendors in less than 60 days, then prepare to accept that — don't start harassing the customer just because your terms are net 30.

To credulously accept this sort of response, on an issue as important as this one, is behavior unfit for any citizen of a free country, where safeguarding the rule of law is a civic responsibility.

Last year, the figure was 333,000, of which 184,000 came from the E.U. Even if you accept, as most do, that immigration has expanded the tax base and kept the price of both food and services down, the influx — for which there is no end in sight — is changing the face of the country too fast for the population to stomach, and the E.U.'s rules on free movement of labor are an easy target.

China's official mouthpiece, Global Times, contended in an editorial: «If the Western countries accept India as a nuclear country and are indifferent to the nuclear race between India and Pakistan, China will not stand out and stick rigidly to those nuclear rules as necessary.

Extending the maturities of Greek bonds «would make it impossible to accept them as collateral for refinancing operations under existing rules,» said Jens Weidermann, Germany's new Bundesbank president.

The U.K. was early in publishing clear directives, ruling in 2014 that «bitcoin may be held as an investment or used to pay for goods or services at merchants where it is accepted.»

Even Ireland is appealing the European Commission's ruling out of fear that accepting the $ 14.5 billion windfall might scare away other global corporations — undermining Ireland's reputation as a tax haven, which has become a cornerstone of the country's economy.

According to the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, an FCM is defined as an individual, association, partnership, corporation or trust that solicits or accepts orders for the execution of a commodity transaction on the pursuant to the rules of a futures contract market and which accept payment from or extend credit to customers.

This press release includes certain financial measures such as Adjusted EBITDA, pretax income and diluted earnings per share, which exclude certain items under each measure and are not considered generally accepted accounting principles («GAAP») measures as defined under SEC rules.

• The Prohibited Transaction 84 - 24: The rule adds Impartial Conduct Standards to PTE 84 - 24, which include acting as a fiduciary, accept only «reasonable» compensation, and make no materially misleading statements.

- + * Businesses that choose to accept virtual currencies such as Bitcoins for their remuneration or revenue are subject to normal income tax rules.

As a general rule, the bonus is not automatically transferred to the trader's account unless s / he accepts it.

The FEC recently ruled that bitcoin can be accepted as a donation by political campaigns and organizations.

But the TPP will mark the first time that Canada has accepted trade treaty obligations governing patent linkage, which could interfere with cost - saving reforms.Copyright and trademarks — TPP copyright rules would require far longer terms of copyright protection, based on the U.S. model, and could require protection for controversial practices such as «digital locks,» which allow copyright holders to encrypt software in computerized devices.

I haven't tried the spreadsheet yet but I would be hesitant in accepting an initial drawdown rate of 4 %, let alone higher, if only because the 4 % rule has been savaged recently as too optimistic.

In my view, Industry and regulators should accept that the rules as drafted must be re-calibrated.

Live by these rules and accept Jesus Christ as your savior and you are living a Christian life.

The Trustee may accept delivery of Bitcoins by such other means as the Sponsor, from time to time, may determine to be acceptable for the Trust, provided that the same is disclosed in a prospectus relating to the Trust filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 424 under the Securities Act.

Although disliking Jews go further back, such as their exile, one of the reasons is that the Pope made a rule that Christians can't loan money (but accepting a loan is ok) so Jews end up taking the job and so long as things are going well, people probably like jews because they received money (though they probably didn't like paying them back with interest).

If a group of people choose to live by a certain set of rules and actually don't mind, then their beliefs should be respected as we would want our beliefs to be accepted and respected as well.

Until this is accepted, the Abrahamic religions are going to have an increasingly difficult time, as fewer an fewer people will accept arbitrary rules based on irrational principles.

They realize it benefits society as a whole to live within a set of generally accepted rules (laws).

@Dunk, Morality doesn't have meaning beyond how if effects people, the rules we agree on and accept as a society will mean nothing when catastrophic even or the sun expanding wipes us off the star map; but why isn't it's effect on mankind enough?

«First we affirm that we desire to follow Scripture alone as a rule of faith and religion, without mixing it with any other things which might be devised by the opinion of men apart from the Word of God, and without wishing to accept for our spiritual government any other doctrine than what is conveyed to us by the same Word without addition to diminution, according to the command of our Lord.»

I wish people would accept that the «Bible» is not gods word neither was it wrote by god but by men who put what they decided they wanted as rules for everyone else to run their life based on, every thing from what type of fabric you can wear at the same time to what you can eat on certain days.

The problem here is looking at the bible as simply a list of rules to either be accepted or not.

As such, it's a commandment, though not in the normally accepted Rules on a Tablet format.

The Muslim people have embraced a way of life and a belief that says... we want to live our lives according to the belief in freedom of rights... the way of self - rule... the way of America, which also accepts peoples» worship of «one's faith of choice as their religion».

The semper reformanda should not become a peg for the history of reformation but serve as a calling into questions of that which has just been adopted and accepted as a rule.

While we all should and do tolerate and accept each others right to worship, the majority should rule, just as in voting, as in democracy and in life.

Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result

From them we glean what has previously been indicated as basic notes in the understanding of the kingdom: the timeless kingship, or kingly rule, of God; an ongoing and present kingdom to be entered and lived in by accepting God's sovereign rule in obedient response; and a final victory of God which is in God's hands, though he calls us to labor in faith and love for its coming.

They said they have made «a personal commitment to Jesus Christ that is still important in their life today,» that their faith is very important in their life today; believe that when they die they will go to Heaven because they have confessed their sins and accepted Jesus Christ as their Savior; strongly believe they have a personal responsibility to share their religious beliefs about Christ with non-Christians; firmly believe that Satan exists; strongly believe that eternal salvation is possible only through grace, not works; strong agree that Jesus Christ lived a sinless life on earth; strong assert that the Bible is accurate in all the principles it teaches; and describe God as the all - knowing, all - powerful, perfect deity who created the universe and still rules it today.

In this context it does not matter how we react to this word - event, whether we accept it as pointing to God himself or reject it in desperate fury, because as part of the world of language it wants to force us, who are part of the world, to confront the whole of the world as well as ourselves without being the whole or being able to rule it.

If euthanasia ever does becomes generally accepted — as it is now in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Canada — under the Emanuel / Stahl rule, dissenting physicians would be required to participate in homicide.

The next paragraph drove home the agonising dilemma facing the followers of a movement which has always been profoundly loyal to the papacy, most of whom were undoubtedly hoping for the election of Joseph Ratzinger as Pope John Paul's successor: «TheVatican ruling, issued by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, indicates that the Pope accepts that there is substance to the charges against Fr Maciel, some of which date back to the 1940s.»

Nevertheless, a nation should include at least such elements as common commitment to the rule of law, generally accepted limits on political power and rhetoric, belief in constitutional governance, the rights of citizens, etc..

@ dot: why would anyone accept the «rules» of something they don't aknowledge as being real?

I accept no responsibility for any consequences as a result of applying these rules...

Under this sort of rule, environmentalist groups would have to accept global warming deniers as members / officers, and African - American groups would have to accept neo-nazis, etc..

The personal prowess of the young David had led all the Israelite tribes finally to accept his rule and from that point he went on to establish a kingdom, and indeed a minor empire, such as Israel had not previously experienced.

The linguistic and biblicist vetos have been seen to be both arbitrary and unwarranted — which makes it all the more pathetic that Dr Paul van Buren in The Secular Meaning of the Gospel still seems to accept them as valid and to rule out «God - statements» as «meaningless» while at the same time his excessive Barthian christocentrism and bibliocentrism turns the patent intention of scriptural statement into a parody of their proper meaning.

Particularly now that liberalism was not a major independent political force or contender for rule its values could be accepted as the legitimate norms of the state and given religious approval.

To accept what it says as true you must first abandon all the rules you would apply to everything else known about the reality you live in.

Christian situation ethics, while accepting such laws and rules as important, refuses to affirm them as absolute and binding for all occasions.

When the Supreme Court ruled that a Christian student group could only be recognized at a small public law school if it accepted non-Christians and gays as potential leaders, some lawyers and campus advocates grew nervous.

It may be in a church that is willing to accept all kinds of people, as long as they play by the rules of the right kind of people.