And the truly sad part is, those same atheists might have even been saved if they had only
accepted the truth rather than spent their time fighting against it...
Not exact matches
Rather, the problem is to get them to reject irrational and supernatural explanations of the world, the demons that exist only in their imaginations, and to
accept a social and intellectual apparatus, Science, as the only begetter of
truth.»
Atheists refuse to
accept the
truth, and thus they will be condemned because they love evil
rather than believing in the
truth.
«What amazes me is that time and time again it has been proven that there is no way the Bible says ok for gay relations but
rather than
accepting the
truth they try to distort it.»
If the majority of society put half of the effort into developing their intellect and forming their own beliefs that many put into living a life controlled by what any random man who claims they are spreading God's message, perhaps people would actually come to their own conclusions
rather than simply
accepting the ones presented to them as the one and only
truth.
Rather it means the church will never
accept an «attitude of resignation» toward the
truth, the assumption that
truth can not be known.
They have the courage to
accept their reality, their
truth, and they truly
accept God as God is,
rather than fictionalizing Him.
Anyways, I appreciate what I see on these pages, which seems to be serious discussion of difficult topics, and a desire on the part of many individuals to find
truth and God,
rather then just
accept or reject automatically the views of an individual, or even of themselves.
In 1958, Michael Argyle wrote: «Although intelligent children grasp religious concepts earlier, they are also the first to doubt the
truth of religion, and intelligent students are much less likely to
accept orthodox beliefs, and
rather less likely to have pro-religious attitudes.»
The next time a Democrat like Sheldon Silver says that Republicans are costing taxpayers, it's best to get the facts and the
truth,
rather than
accepting one - sided rhetoric.
The film requires that we begin to examine the root of all problems facing animals, the primary and difficult
truth we must
accept before proceeding effectively in creating a more compassionate and responsible world — that some life is not respected for its inherent value, but
rather for its desirability or usefulness to us.
Some paintings definitely have an aerial feel but if we
accept that as a feeling
rather than a figurative
truth, it can be abstract.
Moreover, the Román et al. paper starts from a statistical - mechanics basis,, i.e., from first principles,
rather than being based based on blindly
accepting equations as received
truth without double - checking their ranges of applicability.