Sentences with phrase «accepting a contract where»

The problem is simply the fact that the union of teachers was stupid in accepting a contract where teachers could be fired based upon tests that can easily «fixed».

Not exact matches

I remember a similar situation where Walcott kept us waiting for eternity before accepting a new contract just last year.

Cyborg was under contract with the UFC Ronda's entire career, Ronda could have fought her at any time, by her own admission she simply wouldn't unless she was contractually obligated to, and from what I understand Cyborg originally accepted to fight her at 135, but the UFC wasn't willing to pay what she was asking, that is where the whole Invicta / catchweight thing started.

I say that because Sanchez will have a difficult choice to make: If no one improves our offer (assuming there is one) before the window closes and he chooses to play his contract out he runs the risk of having a serious injury midway through the season which will reduce his ability to get the kind of five year contract I am sure he is hoping for, where as if he accepts ours he is safe for the next, extremely important and perhaps the last five years of his playing career but one thing is sure and I say it again only a fool would sign before exploring all the possibilities and that in itself made and makes it impossible for the club to have «made» him sign earlier.

Prosecutors on Thursday afternoon wrapped up 10 weeks of testimony and arguments in Central Islip, where they sought to make the case that the one - time elected officials accepted an illegal stream of benefits from restaurateur Harendra Singh and, in exchange, abused their public positions to get him two county contracts and more than $ 20 million in town - guaranteed loans.

But in a free nation, where senators and representatives are elected to represent their constituents, what is the justification or reasoning for allowing elected officials to accept money from corporations that bid for government contracts, or unions that collectively bargain for government contracts?

Kindle Worlds is a publication submission platform where you choose a licensed World, read the Content Guidelines for that World, write your story, upload that story, create a cover using free images or your own image, and accept a publishing contract with Amazon Publishing.

In a business where authors traditionally have had to accept lousy contracts and low royalty rates just to be in the game, getting taken advantage of may seem the price of doing business.

Contract negotiation in publishing has been and will continue to be for awhile — at least where legacy publishers are concerned — a case of «here's the contract, do you accept it or notContract negotiation in publishing has been and will continue to be for awhile — at least where legacy publishers are concerned — a case of «here's the contract, do you accept it or notcontract, do you accept it or not?»

(5) Please note, we can not accept any liability for any damage, loss, expense or other sum (s) of any nature or description (a) which on the basis of the information given to us by you concerning your booking prior to our accepting it, we could not have foreseen you would suffer or incur if we breached our contract with you or (b) which did not result from any breach of contract or other fault by ourselves or our employees or, where we are responsible for them, our suppliers.

Note that this is a place where you can benefit from good contracts: before you accept an item from a brand or sponsor, get its value in writing.

All you need to do is park the vehicle in the base where the mission is, accept the contract, and then cancel the contract.

The meat of the game still resides firmly in the Career mode, where you begin with one of the lower placed teams and proceed to tackle season after season of racing, accepting new contracts with better teams and hopefully winning a championship or three in the process.

Do we accept legal contract where there is small print buried on the third page of a 10 - page contract?

In many ways, smart contracts are best used where one party makes a «general offer» they are willing to accept either infinitely or a specified number of times.

Where the substance of a complaint is made known it is not also necessary to identify the trigger for accepting the repudiatory breach, and so the trigger for a decision to accept a repudiatory breach of contract need not itself be the subject of a grievance.

Where an employer attempts to vary the contractual terms, the position of the employee is this: He may accept the variation expressly or impliedly in which case there is a new contract.

The Judge applied the «postal acceptance rule», deeming that a contract concluded by post is «made» where the accepted offer is deposited into the mail to be returned to the other party.

Unable to relocate to Tallahassee with Justice Quince following her appointment to the Florida Supreme Court, Ms. O'Connor accepted a position with HealthPlan Services, Inc., where she evaluated insurance contracts / policies for compliance with state and federal insurance laws.

A plaintiff's action was NOT statute barred where the plaintiff refused to accept the defendant's position that it intended to pay a lesser rate of commission than that stipulated in the contract.4 Instead, the plaintiff continued to call upon the defendant to honour its bargain.

One of the main reasons given by Lord Clarke for not always enforcing the black letter terms of written employment contracts was taken from the decision of Elias J in the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Consistent Group: «The concern to which tribunals must be alive is that armies of lawyers will simply place substitution clauses, or clauses denying any obligation to accept or provide work in employment contracts, as a matter of form, even where such terms do not begin to reflect the real relationship.»

The briefing states that «the implication is that where a worker is employed on a zero hours contract and provided with regular work which is regularly accepted there exists a possibility that the contract will be one of employment».

He then referred to articles by Dr F.A. Mann (whose own expertise and reputation in the area were considerable) and Dr E.J. Cohn and pointed out that, from the 19th Century, civil law countries had accepted that a waiver of sovereign immunity by a contract was effective, that the speeches in Duff were obiter and did not constitute a majority and that both Duff and Kahan overlooked the fact that submission in the face of the court was not the only form of valid submission since the introduction of a new Rule in the RSC in 1920 that the English court had jurisdiction to entertain an action where there was a contractual submission.

From there, she accepted a position at a prominent civil firm where she handled a multitude of complex cases in both federal and state courts, including high profile, complex personal injury claims, construction defect cases, contract disputes and bad faith litigation.

The majority considered the evidence of expert historians relating to the type of commodities, including fish, that would have been brought to the truck house to trade.7 Evidence was also accepted by the majority as to the sorts of assumptions «underlying and implicit in the treaty».8 Justice Binnie noted the longstanding willingness of courts to «imply a contractual term on the basis of the presumed intentions of the parties where it is necessary to assure the efficacy of the contract».9

It accepted that where the conditions for a proper market existed, legal aid rates would best be set by providers bidding for contracts on the basis of quality, capacity and price.

He also accepted that the second letter was negligent in not explaining the options to Levicom clearly enough and for giving a misleading impression in relation to the prospects of Levicom succeeding in the arbitration in a claim for declaratory relief against the Swedish companies (where the chances of success in establishing a breach of contract were stated as «in the region of, but not less than, 70 %»), rather than concentrating on how to quantify and make a claim for substantial damages.

«Armies of lawyers will simply put substitution clauses, or clauses denying any obligation to accept or provide work, into employment contracts, as a matter of form, even where such terms do not begin to reflect the real relationship.»

~ Agreeing to accept a lower amount of spousal support does not create a binding contract where no consideration is given, but may constitute waiver of the right to a higher amount.

The banks could argue that, even if a customer is in breach of contract as a result of failing to ensure that there are sufficient funds in the account, that breach has been waived and instead the bank has accepted the customer's offer, made by presenting a cheque or similar, with the result that there is a variation of the existing banking contract, subject to the bank's usual terms about interest and charges, eg charges for consideration of an overdraft application and provision of funds where not previously arranged in advance.

Free Look — The free look period is the period of time required by law after a contract is delivered to the owner, where the owner can decide not to accept the contract and be refunded all premiums paid.

Once the offer has been verbally accepted, immediately send out an offer letter along with the employment contract, confirming key details such as start time and where to report to on their first day.

Originally from Lugano, Switzerland, Anja earned a degree through the UBS banking and finance program.Subsequently, she became a Financial Consultant in Private Banking at the Lugano office of UBS.Anja later accepted a Sales Manager position with LMX SA, a petro - chemical company, where her responsibilities included new client development and contract negotiations.

Anja later accepted a Sales Manager position with LMX SA, a petro - chemical company, where her responsibilities included new client development and contract negotiations.

Long story short, they accepted my offer, but i waited close to a year to try to have the hoarder vacate the property before i closed... Came to the point where he wasnt doing anything to vacate the property and i just said screw it, and cancelled my contract.

Interpretation of the law of contracts always considers the intent of the parties and the intent of a listing is clearly to pay out where there is an accepted offer.

Any layperson who understands how assignment of a contract works outside of real estate (where contract assignment is a long - standing and well - accepted component of contract law) likely realizes that assigning a real estate contract is no different than assigning a manufacturing contract, a service contract or any number of other types of contracts that are frequently assigned.

I often explain to a buyer that almost every time, I get paid from the sale proceeds of the home but that occasionally, some people refuse for one reason or another to pay a commission or to pay an amount I expect to be paid or that Is not commensurate with my efforts to obtain a sale on a home for my buyers that is acceptable to the buyer, to protect the buyer by writing a well thought out contract where the buyer does not need to worry about legalities because I have the years of experience behind me and my Brokerage accepts legal liability for the contract.

Helmsley - Spear, Inc. v. Kupferschmid (301 A.D. 2d 442)-- no commission was due where sale of the subject property and broker's commission were contingent upon the satisfaction of the condition which went unsatisfied through no fault of the seller; broker failed to produce a buyer ready, willing and able to purchase the property on terms acceptable to the seller where the «marked - up» contract returned to seller by the buyer's lawyer constituted a counteroffer which seller did not, and was not in good faith obligated to, accept.

Steven G. Walther, Inc. v. Taranto (16 A.D. 3d 1076) buyers procured by broker remained ready willing and able to complete the purchase pursuant to the terms of the purchase contract thereby entitling broker to its commission where purchase and sale contract addendum made the offer contingent upon the sale of buyer's existing residence; pursuant to the addendum, seller received another purchase offer, he was entitled, upon notice to the buyers, to accept the offer and cancel the contract with the buyers unless they removed the sale and transfer of title contingency within three days after receiving such notice; buyers could remove the contingency by demonstrating in writing that they had accepted a mortgage loan commitment which does not require the sale and transfer of title of their property as a condition of the mortgage loan funding; buyer complied with such requirement, even though mortgage loan commitment was subject to additional conditions not prohibited by the contract; judgment for broker.

The licensee should refer the buyer for legal advice where the buyer wishes to withdraw an accepted back - up contract or where the buyer wishes to include a term in the offer which permits the withdrawal of the back - up offer after acceptance.