We currently have around 80 serious
expressions of interest, but until production volumes for our market are confirmed, we will not
accept any further orders.
In light
of these observations, the Appeal Court, by balancing the different protected
interests, ruled that, by refusing, in the specific context
of the case and without reasonable cause, to
accept the doctor's request for anonymisation, although this request was part
of a legitimate claim
of right to be forgotten, and did not constitute a disproportionate interference in the freedom
of expression of the press, the editor was at fault within the meaning
of Article 1382
of the Civil Code and caused prejudice to the doctor.