Sentences with phrase «accepting human caused»

Not exact matches

The Trudeau government believes accepting the scientific evidence for human - caused climate change and reducing greenhouse gas emissions are critical to gaining social licence for pipelines, Carr says.

Of course, many natural events are well outside the ability of humans to perform and have no obvious visible cause (e.g. thunderstorms, earthquakes, tides, etc.), so if you accept that invisible beings are responsible for them you also have to assume those invisible beings are immensely powerful.

I maintained that, contrary to the commonly expressed or tacitly accepted view, the era of active evolution did not end with the appearance of the human zoological type: for by virtue of his acquirement of the gift of individual reflection Man displays the extraordinary quality of being able to totalize himself collectively upon himself, thus extending on a planetary scale the fundamental vital process which causes matter, under Certain conditions, to organize itself in elements which are ever more complex physically, and psychologically ever more centrated.

It is for those who are too weak to accept the reality that: (1) there isn't a being who will make sure, in the end, justice is served to those who cause harm and suffering to other humans, (2) there is a powerful being who will take care of us, (3) our lives have a purpose beyond us, (4) we are alone.

Religion is the ONLY ignition point for all past, present, and future wars and causes inability to accept others as human beings... Anyways why would a god want any of us in heaven?

«Whoso turns his attention to the bitter strifes of these days and seeks a reason for the troubles that vex public and private life must come to the conclusion that a fruitful cause of the evils which now afflict, as well as those which threaten, us lies in this: that false conclusions concerning divine and human things, which originated in the schoolsof philosophy, have now crept into all the orders of the State, and have been accepted by the common consent of the masses.»

- humans are curious creatures and look for causes - some stop investigating and accept what's popular and comfortable.

Accepting the denier's view that human activity is not causing climate change would also preclude the natural solution to human - caused climate change.

In addition to shedding light on how abnormal glia can cause schizophrenia, the study underlined how readily mouse brains accept human cells.

Those who know more about climate science, for example, are slightly more likely to accept that global warming is real and caused by humans than those who know less on the subject.

Just look at the pathogens that are accepted as causing cancer — Epstein - Barr virus, Kaposi's sarcoma — associated herpesvirus, human T lymphotropic virus 1 — and find out whether they're transmitted this way.

The White House obviously accepts the science behind human - caused climate change, as was made clear again this week by its announcement of plans to cut carbon emissions from U.S.

Kaine tried one last time: «Do you accept that climate change is caused by human activity, at least in part?»

According to Kahan, the study also casts doubt on the value of social - marketing campaigns that feature the message that «97 % of climate scientists» accept human - caused climate change.

Regardless of whether participants said they accepted that human activity caused climate change, most recognized that scientists expect climate change to create serious environmental dangers, including increased coastal flooding.

A clinical human trial recently published in The New England Journal of Medicine in August of 2017 may tip a few more in the medical field into accepting the current awareness that inflammatory damage is a major cause of heart and cardiovascular disease, and cholesterol is trying to patch up the damage before the vessel begins to leak or rupture.

The respectful mind accepts, indeed welcomes, the differences among human individuals and groups and tries to make common cause with the rest of humanity.

However, the Management and Guest Contributors at WUWT accept the basic truth that CO2, water vapor, and other «greenhouse gases» are responsible for an ~ 33ºC boost in mean Earth temperature, that CO2 levels are rising, partly due to our use of fossil fuels, that land use has changed Earth's albedo, and that this human actvity has caused additional warming.

Although the IPCC reports are conservative, accepting their validity commits the fossil - fuel industry to agreeing that (1) climate change is real, (2) humans are causing it and (3) it's dangerous.

Australia, latest poll 3 May 2011 72 % population accept that humans are partly or fully the cause of climate change,

It's not that Nate revealed himself to be a climate change denier; He accepts that human - caused climate change is real, and that it represents a challenge and potential threat.

If we accept that human CO2 on the order of parts per billion causes warming, it begs the question of what we should do to cause a cooling.

That humans have caused the increase in CO2 is proven beyond reasonable doubt, and is generally accepted even by «climate sceptics».

(How exactly do the some folks accept the natural variability they like but revoke the laws of physics for human caused variability?

How exactly do the some folks accept the natural variability they like but revoke the laws of physics for human caused variability?

Professor Curry wrote, «If you accept the premise that human caused climate change is dangerous and that we need to rapidly stop burning fossil fuels, then I don't see a near term alternative to nuclear.»

If you accept the premise that human caused climate change is dangerous and that we need to rapidly stop burning fossil fuels, then I don't see a near term alternative to nuclear.

How I would love for just one reporter to ask Mr. Inhofe (or any other denialist) «Please, what level of evidence would you accept as substantial enough that human caused climate change is real?»

The above graph shows that the public became increasingly accepting of human - caused global warming during 2010 — 2014, so perhaps 97 % consensus messaging is moving the dial after all.

As we documented in our paper, research has also shown that when people are aware of the expert consensus on human - caused global warming, they're more likely to accept the science and support climate policy to address the problem.

Although the two studies used hugely different methodologies, it's notable that their findings came away with almost exactly the same percentages that accept human - caused climate change.

Reblogged this on Climate Collections and commented: Executive Summary: If you accept the premise that human caused climate change is dangerous and that we need to rapidly stop burning fossil fuels, then I [JC] don't see a near term alternative to nuclear.

He had claimed he found 34 abstracts in the scientific mainstream that did not accept the consensus position that humans are causing rapid climate changes.

that «Human combustion of fossil fuels is significantly causing that climate change» is also true, then many, perhaps most, people will accept that there is a need to «reduce greenhouse gas emissions and build out clean energy» even if it will «cost consumers money, decrease energy security and destroy jobs».

People who do not accept human - caused climate change generally believe that a large fraction of scientists disagree with the basic notion of man - made warming.

Cuccinelli's opponent, McAuliffe, accepts that human activity is causing climate change, according to his press secretary Josh Schwerin.

A 2012 study in the journal Nature Climate Change found that people were more likely to accept human - caused global warming if they were informed that scientists were in broad agreement (which we know they are).

And, if we accept the WEC 2010 estimate of the inferred total amount of remaining fossil fuels on our planet, the maximum possible human - caused CO2 concentration that could ever be asymptotically reached is around 1020 ppmv.

# 2 Is a big problem for climate skeptics because they don't want to accept the warming of the 20th century was human caused.

Integrity is an important concern, especially when so many scientists have accepted far larger sums for research that emphasizes human causes, including some at Penn State, Virginia, George Mason and other institutions associated with the IPCC and EPA.

Articles about methods, paleoclimatology, mitigation, adaptation, and effects at least implicitly accept human - caused global warming and were usually obvious from the title alone.

There's a widely held belief that when it comes to human - caused climate change, you're far less likely to accept the science if you lean toward the right of the political spectrum.

The administration declined to join the Kyoto treaty on climate change, even though last year Mr. Bush accepted findings by a panel of American experts that human activity had caused most of the global warming in recent decades.

Whether to even accept the overwhelming evidence that climate change is real and human - caused has become a partisan political issue, thanks in large parts to the efforts of bad actors like the Koch Brothers to poison both our atmosphere and our public discourse.

If one accepts that all of the increase from 280 to 390 ppmv was caused only by human CO2 emissions (as IPCC does), then this statement is obviously incorrect and the figure should be 72 %.

If one accepts these premises, then there immediately follows the idea that all lower - frequency variations (seen as «trend» from the limited perspective of a human lifetime) must be due to anthropogenic causes, i.e. AGW.

They are happy to accept that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and causes warming, that humans produce CO2, that CO2 levels are rising, and that the earth has warmed in the last century.

The American Tradition Institute (ATI), a coal company - funded group that does not accept the scientific evidence for human - caused climate change, sued in 2011 for six years of Mann's emails (roughly 38,000 emails) from the University of Virginia, where he had been a professor.

Large majorities in every major nation on the planet accept the scientific consensus that humans are causing climate change.

I am not sure whether you accept the reality of anthropogenic climate change (climate change caused by humans, ACC).