Sentences with phrase «accepting things without»

Basically that anything besides fact is speculation and can only be taken on accepting things without evidence.

This is not something that all people can do, as some people can not accept things without the verification that the thing is true, and if there were proof, then it isn't faith.»

If someone is willing to try something new, is open to innovative ideas, opinions, adventure, different styles and just an overall willingness to accept things without a cloud of judgment hanging above, he is a great guy in my book.

Not exact matches

I have constraints in that I have to meet quarterly numbers, which is a good thing — it's certainly good discipline — but it's a bad thing as well because if I wanted to invest, for instance, a $ 100 million to just make my brand name more accepted for two quarters and in the third quarter I'll get traction, that's not an option I would consider without a lot of pull.

That machine learning — the ability for computers to learn to recognize things or complete tasks without specific programming allowing them to do so — is a transformative technology is generally accepted.

Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the Constitution bars federal officers from, among other things, accepting, without the consent of Congress, payments and gifts «of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.»

They'll accept Lively's claims of being «vilified» and «attacked» without taking a single moment to look at the heinous and hurtful things that he says and does.

Tom tom: I'm sure you accept many things without absolute proof - for example, you probably accept that matter is made of atoms which you can not see; you probably accept that gravity is not going to disappear tomorrow; you probably believe that testing a theory over and over will yield reliable results.

I am looking for authenticity, relevancy, no ovewhelming bands that take away from the experience of worship, clergy who are willing to answer my hard questions, who understand doubt is a stepping stone to deepening my belief, who accept everyone as Jesus did (and we know Jesus was a rebel who accepted and led all sorts of people), who don't feel the need to try to be hip, who speak about things without inserting politics, who are wiling to trash the temple to bring us back to the truth, who will step out of the box of comfort and be real.

If the Darwinist, taking up Descartes» and Bacon's project of understanding nature according only to material and efficient causes, studies the history of living things and says that he can see no organizing, active principles of whole living substances (formal causes) and no real plan, purpose or design in living things (final causes), then I accept his report without surprise.

The concept of person, however, extending all the way back to its Latin roots (persona), accepts the social nature of the human individual, and the necessity of social recognition, without ever regarding the individual as reducible to these things.

«First we affirm that we desire to follow Scripture alone as a rule of faith and religion, without mixing it with any other things which might be devised by the opinion of men apart from the Word of God, and without wishing to accept for our spiritual government any other doctrine than what is conveyed to us by the same Word without addition to diminution, according to the command of our Lord.»

But the most amazing thing to me is that there are people who think that the universe is too complicated to exist without having been created, and yet accept that there is a God who exists without having been created, and yet who is more complicated than the universe!

Since there is only one God, idols are nothing; so long as the Christians offered thanksgiving to God for the meat, they could accept it without any qualms of conscience, as a gift from the hand of the One who opens His hand to satisfy the desires of every living thing.

People who accept things on faith, without evidence, won't be swayed by evidence.

Some believe that the ecological sensibility calls on us to accept the struggle of living things with one another without sentimentality.

Where most Bible translations accurately translate the Greek as saying something along the lines of «The natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God,» the NIV reads Calvinistic theology into this verse, and assumes that the natural man does not even have the Spirit, and so translated the verse this way: «The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God.»

if any man knows he is accepted by beloved, he has the power to become the children of God without doing or not doing any thing.

In the schools the lack of a clear - cut conception is evident there where a frankly pluralistic approach to the work of the ministry has been accepted and where men are prepared for the varieties of the ministry as well as the varieties of ministerial work without reference to a common function to be carried out by all ministers and by every minister in all the things he does.

The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God but considers them foolishness, and can not understand them because they are discerned only through the Spirit.

Especially since I was not supposed to question things and people but to merely accept many things without thinking or researching on my own.

My reasoning is that you without even knowing all the facts believe completely that the man you know as jesus was the son of your god, yet seem to be having a very difficult time accepting this man for the EXACT SAME THING.

«The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he can not understand them, because they are spiritually discerned.»

I think the main thing for all of us is to accept one another and the decisions we make for fellowship and following Jesus without thinking we have to all see things the same.

But however grim things began to look by 1992, 93, etc., I can't accept that as the fully - unveiled truth about rap; that is, I can't talk about rap without fondly remembering a certain charge and hope one really could connect to it, indeed had to connect to it, in 1989.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

of course there are obvious things that are without question proven but even in the scientific community, you can find things that require faith to accept it as a fact.

Each time he issues yet another apology, Christian leaders tell us, (and those caught in the abusive environment at Mars Hill), that the Christian thing to do is accept the apology without question and wipe the slate clean in the name of grace and forgiveness.

I think I may need to accept the fact that some things can't be duplicated without gluten.

So I gave up on the whole thing and accepted that there is no life without the delicious comforting liquid!

Alcohol is one of those things that you have to accept that nothing will quite replace it, but I have usually managed to find substitutes along the way - as long as my goal is to modify the recipe to meet my needs and not duplicate the taste (which isn't going to happen) I manage quite nicely without alcohol in my cooking.

Trading with other parents or accepting hand - me - downs are two ways to keep things interesting for your child without having to spend a fortune on new toys.

The WFP endorsed Gov. Andrew Cuomo last fall, agreeing to accept his platform even though it included some things the party had in the past opposed — like the property tax cap and closing the budget deficit without raising taxes.

I mean we can not accept things in this manner, done haphazardly without any due cause to laid down procedures,» he indicated.

You've accepted a lot of things without evidence.

Can you rewrite a new, more truthful, more inclusive story that allows you to accept your participation in the hard things that happen without blaming yourself, shaming others, or taking on more than your share of the responsibility?

As adults, it is easy to just accept things at face value or to know that something works without understanding how.

if you boys desire to get ripped immediately without spending a single another minute in the gym, then you should check out this video tutorial SIXPP.COMIt's a very funny thing about life; if you refuse to accept anything but the best, you very often get it.

Is it better to leave things to chance and accept a present that's ill - fitting, yet selected without direction?

Someone who will try new things, travel, who opens the door for a lady, Not afraid to show his emotions, Accepts the quirkiness I bring to the table, respects the differences in people without judgment.

Whether you are searching for someone special, have been dating a. is a thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof.

When reflecting on these 2 things, try to do it on your own, without accepting advice from anyone.

How I handle it is to accept that a flutter is a good thing... it means I've gone where I'm uncomfortable going and that is how I define living without a leash.»

~ Lauren This is not your typical happily ever after... Lauren Brooks wants to do three things: Escape the small town she grew up in, get accepted to her dream school in Chicago, and graduate without drowning in debt.

The FHA Total Scorecard System can make a recommendation (approve / accept or refer) without a case number, property address, or CAIVR disposition but it will need those things plus an appraisal to issue a final approval.

In my small unique book «The small stock trader» I also had more detailed overview of tens of stock trading mistakes (http://thesmallstocktrader.wordpress.com/2012/06/25/stock-day-trading-mistakessinceserrors-that-cause-90-of-stock-traders-lose-money/): • EGO (thinking you are a walking think tank, not accepting and learning from you mistakes, etc.) • Lack of passion and entering into stock trading with unrealistic expectations about the learning time and performance, without realizing that it often takes 4 - 5 years to learn how it works and that even +50 % annual performance in the long run is very good • Poor self - esteem / self - knowledge • Lack of focus • Not working ward enough and treating your stock trading as a hobby instead of a small business • Lack of knowledge and experience • Trying to imitate others instead of developing your unique stock trading philosophy that suits best to your personality • Listening to others instead of doing your own research • Lack of recordkeeping • Overanalyzing and overcomplicating things (Zen - like simplicity is the key) • Lack of flexibility to adapt to the always / quick - changing stock market • Lack of patience to learn stock trading properly, wait to enter into the positions and let the winners run (inpatience results in overtrading, which in turn results in high transaction costs) • Lack of stock trading plan that defines your goals, entry / exit points, etc. • Lack of risk management rules on stop losses, position sizing, leverage, diversification, etc. • Lack of discipline to stick to your stock trading plan and risk management rules • Getting emotional (fear, greed, hope, revenge, regret, bragging, getting overconfident after big wins, sheep - like crowd - following behavior, etc.) • Not knowing and understanding the competition • Not knowing the catalysts that trigger stock price changes • Averaging down (adding to losers instead of adding to winners) • Putting your stock trading capital in 1 - 2 or more than 6 - 7 stocks instead of diversifying into about 5 stocks • Bottom / top fishing • Not understanding the specifics of short selling • Missing this market / industry / stock connection, the big picture, and only focusing on the specific stocks • Trying to predict the market / economy instead of just listening to it and going against the trend instead of following it

This way they quickly learn to accept things, such as the sound of the vacuum cleaner, without fear.

Hoyland does much the same thing but in a less programmatic way and without resource to an anonymous surface: the action is far more self - indulgent, «painterly» in a more accepted or understood sense, polychromatic and broader in formal range.

By accepting these works, we join Contreras in celebrating them, and without constraints or categorisation of medium or space, this show stands as a tribute to many of the things that make us human.

Then I went to Twitter and searched for coral reefs; there was a string of tweets about the piece — all of them accepting the main argument without question, e.g., «Scariest thing I've read in a while.