Sentences with phrase «accepting times gone»

Annie Hall is a film built on memories, and accepting times gone.

Not exact matches

At this time, Amazon says it has no plans to start accepting food stamps or other forms of assistance at Amazon Go, but that it will continue to look for ways to better serve customers.

«The dominant and accepted understanding at the time, which continues, is that business is there to make a profit for shareholders — period,» said David Langstaff, who went on to become chief executive at national security firms Veridian Corp. and TASC.

«Thereby, the U.K. gets access to the financial markets of Europe, but at the same time the U.K. won't accept European citizens to go and work in the U.K. as they currently do freely.»

Ask when you must accept or decline and then take the time to go over the offer and if need be, put your negotiating hat on to make sure that you are being compensated appropriately based on your experience and industry.

«I love Uber more than anything in the world and at this difficult moment in my personal life I have accepted the investors request to step aside so that Uber can go back to building rather than be distracted with another fight,» Kalanick said in a statement to the Times.

«Today, most Warsaw residents, even if they may not think it's pretty, prefer to accept it as a local landmark and a «souvenir» of times gone by,» she said.

When I went solo in 2006 I made less time for «purely creative writing» as I accepted just how much creativity my clients and their markets required.

She went on to state that she had convinced her local Chinese take - out restaurant to accept bitcoin, and that if she had time after controlling interest rates, she was going to put together a bitcoin meetup at the Federal Reserve.

It is the perfect waste of time and energy, and gives great comfort to the masses unable to accept that this life is the only one your are going to get.

Until this is accepted, the Abrahamic religions are going to have an increasingly difficult time, as fewer an fewer people will accept arbitrary rules based on irrational principles.

When you are accepted into the congregation and community, then you're going to be more willing to go and worship and put your time towards the Lord.

While it took me some time to work through the theology around it, once I accepted it as loving there was no further doubt in my mind that I could never go back to believing that God was against that love.

There have been plenty of wars fought over a wide range of reasons, not all wars are over religion, when are you athiests going to get off of your high horse and accept the fact that everyone, religious and non religious cause violence at some time.

He said, «It goes (i.e. travels) till it prostrates Itself underneath the Throne and takes the permission to rise again, and it is permitted and then (a time will come when) it will be about to prostrate itself but its prostration will not be accepted, and it will ask permission to go on its course but it will not be permitted, but it will be ordered to return whence it has come and so it will rise in the west.

He will ask you to account for your time on earth and if you have not accepted Christ as your personal savior you will certainly go to hell for eternity.

Clive, you point out how others often don't understand what Jesus was saying; but while Jesus often labors to try and make things clear to the unbeliever («Oh, you of little faith) or at the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following him.

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

again, society has accepted the christian calendar so i guess that goes hand in hand with time off.

The pat answers the church accepts just isn't going to cut it for them, and there will be times when all we have to offer them is the love of Christ.

You've been brainwashed as a child into a particular set of ideas, it's time to let go an accept the fact that they're just ideas and not facts.

And, as time went on, the more open - minded learned of the pomp and magnificence of the religion of their captors and the might of supreme Marduk before whom, by the accepted test of arms, Yahweh's puny strength had but mocked his people's need.

It is so sad that so many atheists will spend most of their lives fighting and arguing against the very thing that can save them, only to die and go to hell and then to spend eternity regretting the fact that they wasted all of their time arguing about it rather than just accepting it, rather than just believing, and a belief that could have saved them.

It's artistic expression and very often a way someone going through troubling times (I can only imagine knowing your unborn child had DS would be troubling) can work through their grief and accept the situation.

Although I have to admit that David went through a very, very, hard time for his wrong doings, all of the book of Psalms was not a good time for him, but he kept YHWH in his heart wholeheartedly, and was loyal, and dedicated, with a lion's heart, so his «seeds» would get recognition in the future generations, and grace in the end, he accepted his wrong doings, and like a man dealt with them, being responsible for them.

The task has been accepted in academic theological circles for a long time, but only in the last few years has there been more popular and widespread interest in what is going on.

Just wait a couple of hundred years and catholic theology accepts that the earth is not the center of the universe... wait more time and witch burning isn't all of the rage it was... wait a couple of hundred of years more and purgatory goes out the window...

As Paul accepts the invitation and prepares to go, Luke introduces for the first time in the text of Acts what has come to be known as the «we passages» (16:10).

Those who wanted to get out (and I am one of them) are going to have to accept that independence will not mean a return to the lost days of Imperial London, but will probably mean acceptance that England (with tiny Wales at her side) is on her own again for the first time in more than four hundred years.

I'm glad to accept the invitation, and even though the time I can devote to the tour is limited, I am going to give a short review of The High Calling and give you some links to other bloggers involved with the tour.

You can choose to accept God's gift of redemption or you can just go on as you are now (well actually it's going to get much much worse) for a time.

At times like this I feel like John Dunbar in Dances With Wolves: injured in the US Civil War, who accepts a post on the western frontier and «goes native ``.

I learned a long time ago that instead of critiquing what the boys consume when they're out with their friends, I have to accept that they are not going to go for the salad or nutritiously well - balanced meal when so many other crave - worthy choices are staring them straight in the face.

I have finally accepted that no matter how much time I spend scanning my closet, I am going to be dressed for the wrong season.

And, one day, if I have kids, I'll cook for them too — they'll just have to accept the fact that, from time to time, mommy's gonna set off the fire alarm.

And if they can't find the right store among the ten to 20 applicants it gets every week, the market's full - time staff goes hunting: When the market's spice wholesaler shuttered after 30 years, it convinced the Head Nut to move in from the suburbs (the market doesn't accept national chains or franchises).

Wilshere for all his injuries is far better than both Ramsey and Xhaka.I just don't know the importance of Xhaka in the team if he can't defend.He's the real problem in the squad.Why do fans keep accepting mediocrity?Aren't we tired?It's painful seeing him play every match in our midfield then the same people who claim to love him would come and be making noise about how average he is after a bad match forgetting that he's actually average.I'd easily play Maitland - Niles or Coquelin over Xhaka.They would provide more steel in the midfield.Is it going to take us four seasons to realize how average Xhaka is?The painful things is that by that time many trophies would've have by passed us.

Lemar and Sanchez situation, is a smoke screen, I for one felt Arsenal did not have the money to buy the players we actually wanted, that is why we were going to sell some of our main players, the lemar deal was a fake, Arsenal knew long enough that lemar had a match on the same day the window was going to be closed the timing of the bid was just the right time not to be accepted.

That they went from being upset with the UFC and trying as hard as possible to get a fight with a hobbit and then trolled Edgar after for not accepting, but when it comes to Khabib they are all «aw shucks, Dana has a good point, maybe next time»

Often when the car outside is running out of road, if you look at it I was ahead for quite a period of time, and then I accepted defeat, and I just I backed out, because I knew he was going to try to run me wide, maybe.

The Arsenal legend Robert Pires has already accepted that that is now out of our reach and that it is time for the Gunners to just go all out to take the Europa League trophy as the only way we can save our season and get to next years Champions League.

The TV pundits last night said that any player with so little time on the pitch was going to be rusty and I can accept that.

So the theory is that, although people accept that our football can be brilliant at times and that we can be a match for just about anyone on our day, Arsenal can not stand up to adversity or do it when the going gets tough.

Both TV pundits Thierry Henry and Graeme Souness were on the side of the Bournemouth boss as well, even though they accepted that Flamini had not gone to injure his opponent and Gosling had time enough to avoid it.

«It's not the best scenario for a coach, but we have to accept that this has been the calendar since a long time ago and we know that during the break we are going to lose maybe 10 or 12 players.

The Arsenal board don't want Le Prof to go now, not before in 2 to 3 years time will they accept he can go if still he doesn't win any of the majority of Arsenal fans most sort after 2 titles of the PL & the CL which have eluded the club for over a decade since Arsenal last won the PL and reached the CL final in 2006.

Few months back I considered myself a rabid AOB sort of a Piers Morgan type, after some time I came to terms with myself that nothing was going to change, it did not matter my tirades or how many comments would post, things at ARSENAL would not change, our destiny is intertwine with AW till the day he decides is enough for him or his Contract is over, for sure not before that, SO there is no point anymore in pointing AW deficiencies nor trashing the Man, he reached the top of his abilities and is consistent with that, making the top 4 reaching the last 16 at the CL and as a BONUS last year maybe this one the FA Cup, reality is he will not reach anything more and we just have to settle and accept (as he has done) our STATUS QUO a good team but not good enough........

I love Alexis, but he needs to accept the fact that it's gonna take him some time to gain form / fitness.

I'm not going to debate it with you, it's pointless given we've just won the FA cup and nobody can accept any player critique at that point in time.

I've pretty much accepted that Wenger is not going to get rid him, so what has to be done is we need to sign another striker who would play back up for the mean time, with the eventual view of him replacing Giroud.