On Capitol Hill, a report accompanying the Labor / Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) appropriations bill recommends that when a journal
accepts a paper generated with NIH support, a copy be sent to PubMed Central, the NIH National Library of Medicine's (NLM's) archive of full - text articles.
Not exact matches
As digitally
generated data have proliferated, many electronic alternatives to traditional
paper lab notebooks have emerged, varying widely both in price — from free to astronomical — and in how rigorously they adhere to
accepted documentation standards.
The part of the
paper that has
generated all the publicity («warming at an unprecedented rate», and all that) and got it
accepted at Science is unsupported by the data.
I suppose you would be far too clever to believe any of the computer
generated gibberish
papers accepted for publication by Springer or IEEE.