Sentences with phrase «accepts change at»

As with all new things, not everyone accepts change at the same pace and there are challenges ahead.

Learners don't necessarily accept change at first; they want to understand what the training is all about.

Not exact matches

Chris Slowe, chief technology officer for the site, which is one of the most active hubs of Bitcoin enthusiasts, told Cheddar it was Coinbase's migration to a new platform that led to the Bitcoin ban in late March, but ongoing site changes at Reddit should allow it to accept crypto payments again.

Winning the Lou Dobbs Career - Management Award, Joe Galli decides to leave the number two job at Black & Decker to become CEO of PepsiCo's Frito - Lay division — only to change his mind hours later and accept the job of president and COO of Amazon.com.

By letting god in on their issues, feelings, whatever, now they feel like they're not alone in whatever «it» is anymore (of course, I think nothings changed at all, accept their perception of the world around them).

Because of its permissive attitude toward theological ideas, it accepts the alcoholic at the point he has reached in his religious life and allows his religious formulations to grow as his experiences change.

And some see grace at work, are freed to accept themselves, and stay and change too.

Now, the Marxists accept qualitative transformation at the lower levels of the evolutionary process, but at the level of reason, they fail to apply the law of qualitative change.

Such short - term therapy aims not at deep underlying problems, but at helping the person do things that will improve his chances of achieving productive sobriety — things such as accepting the fact that he is an alcoholic, learning how to face and handle his fears and resentments constructively, changing his ways of relating so that the guilt - isolation - anger spiral is not triggered so often.

Today, however, her faithful members are asked whether they truly love the Church, accepting the change even though it appears strange at first, or whether by their secret or public protest they show that they have not really loved the Church herself, but only their idea of her.

I'll also accept the answer of «nothing» that will change your mind because at least we'll agree that since nothing can change your mind it's impossible to debate or even hold a discussion with you and we'll go our separate ways.

They accused me of reducing the Easter event to a mere change of outlook on the part of the disciples, or, in the manner of Bultmann, to a decision on our part, at this present time, to accept as our Lord the Christ who encounters us in the Easter preaching of the Church, to which the whole question of an event alleged to have happened two thousand years ago is irrelevant.

In short, anyone who appreciates the rapid change in historical circumstances and does not flee from this into a ghetto; anyone who knows that there is and always has been a mutable, human law of the Church, and that this kind of change has always been practised; anyone, moreover, who reflects that the Church not only has the right but the duty of shaping its canon law in accordance with changes in the times, will not be surprised at the change in many legal regulations which he is living through at the present time, but will recognize and accept this as a sign of the vitality of the Church and its pastoral care.

Looking at this side of the ambiguity, we see a church in which many first - world Christians of our day could feel comfortable and undisturbed: a church that lives without question or resistance in a state founded on violence and made prosperous by the exploitation of less fortunate nations; a church that accepts various perquisites from that state as its due; a church where changing jobs for the sake of peace and justice is seldom considered; a church that constantly speaks in the language of war; a church given to eloquent invective in its internal disputes and against outside opponents; a church quite sure that God will punish the wicked.

If one accepts Whitehead's definition of time as «the conformation of state to state, the later to the earlier,» and if one assumes that the past really changes, then we would have no conception of time because there would be nothing definite or determinate for the present to conform to.12 The distinction between the past and the future seems to be at least partly defined in terms of determinateness and indeterminateness.

If Chad and others argue that naturalistic evolution must be dismissed because we don't know exactly what happened with gene mutation and transmission frequencies during particular periods of rapid change, then how can we accept a replacement argument in which we don't even know what happens at all?

It just saddens me that you seem to have gotten sidetracked in a vain quest to «change the world» thru planting «churches» that are not in fact churches --- at least not if you still accept the authority of the scriptures and it's definition of what constitutes the Body of Christ, both universally and locally.

Do you hope that Jason will someday regain his faith, and if so, how do you find the balance between accepting him where he's at and hoping / praying for change?

He might have winced at the thought that he had changed or even slightly revised any ecumenically accepted doctrine.

He warns that by adding them to the well - publicized list of «fundamental rights and freedoms» which was accepted as public world law in the Universal Declaration of 1948 and its subsequent Conventions, we risk diluting the «true» rights and place them at the mercy of changing policy decisions.

At the same time, h0m0 who are bothered by or in conflict with their feelings but who are either uninterested in changing, or unable to change, their orientation can be helped to accept themselves as they are and to rid themselves of self - hatred.

I agree that grace is limitless, but wouldn't someone who has been forgiven (and accepted) by grace at least have a strong desire to change the wrong things in their life?

b We may accept that the human brain reached the limit of its development at the stage which anthropologists call Homo sapiens; or at least, if it has continued to develop since then, that the change can not be detected by our present methods of observation.

While accepting the undeniable fact of the general evolution of Life in the course of time, many biologists still maintain that these changes take place without following any defined course, in any direction and at random.

It's changed to what ever Rev. Jeremiah Wright told him it should be at the time, so that the people would continue to be fooled and more accepting of him.

The church has at times changed its moral teachings — for example, it condemned slavery after having accepted it for centuries.

show me anywhere that allopatric speciation (which is the ONLY mechanism that I am aware of put forth to explain PE) is a proven and accepted means by which such rapid change: A. takes place at all B. DOES NT take place during the long periods of stasis.

Being too young at that time, I obviously don't have first hand experience of Wenger's achievements prior to the Invincibles, but times have change and we've got to accept oil clubs being part and parcel of the game.

No point analysing the defeat... nothing will change at Arsenal, accept the our shortcomings and move on.

Realistically, No Guardiolla or Morinho can be consistent, or deliver what the fans are asking Wenger to, with the current squad and none of tope flight football managers would accept to assume Wenger's role at Arsenal unless the necessary changes have been effected.

For starters I say change our attitude and now accept our flaws, that way at least we can go forward.

I will try to stick to my new year's resolution to accept things as they are and only regain hope at Arsenal when things change.

Now this isn't the right approach a football club should take, but I've come to accept that the board is unlikely to change that and so I'm expecting Wenger to remain for at least the remainder of the season.

I really believed that the Frenchman would push on after the financial shackles were lifted and I still feel that he did an amazing job in those seasons after we moved from Highbury to the Emirates, but I have come to accept this season that Arsenal need a change at the top.

Few months back I considered myself a rabid AOB sort of a Piers Morgan type, after some time I came to terms with myself that nothing was going to change, it did not matter my tirades or how many comments would post, things at ARSENAL would not change, our destiny is intertwine with AW till the day he decides is enough for him or his Contract is over, for sure not before that, SO there is no point anymore in pointing AW deficiencies nor trashing the Man, he reached the top of his abilities and is consistent with that, making the top 4 reaching the last 16 at the CL and as a BONUS last year maybe this one the FA Cup, reality is he will not reach anything more and we just have to settle and accept (as he has done) our STATUS QUO a good team but not good enough........

I think, we should accept that the boss is far better at seeing talent in players than any of us, who can change their opinion game in, game out.

A lot of Arsenal fans have started to look at the huge salary that Arsenal play to Arsene Wenger every year as one of the biggest, if not the main, reason for the Frenchman's stubborn refusal to accept that things are not working and that we need a change at the top.

His team mates don't like him because he is a winner and doesn't accept mediocrity and if we keep him, we'll lose 70 million and nothing will change either way as the display at Liverpool showed.

I think after 10 years of seeing the same issues go unaddressed or unresolved we have to accept that nothing is going to change now at least not with wenger in charge.

The man has changed out of recognition from his early years et the club.It is my opinion he has allowed himself to feel as though he is BIGGER than the Club.This especially so since that dark day of David Deins departure.He seems to believe he is untouchable and answerable to nobody.The Board were s *** ing bricks he would walk away and to my mind he used this to get his own way with everything.I have met this man on numerous occasions down the years of his time at the club and honestly he is the most polite and well versed Manager in Football.That is why I despise him more.He KNOWS he has failed this last decade.He knows he has made far too many wrong decisions with transfers and tactics and formations etc.But he NEVER accepts he is wrong.

He had originally accepted a pre-contract with Bolton Wanderers but had a change of heart and signed for City instead, meaning he was on the books at the Reebok for just one day.

It is interesting to hear Wenger state in the last few days that he hoped Cesc will be with us for a good 2 or 3 seasons, just when it coincided with Barcelona declaring that they are making drastic cuts to their wage bill on and off the field.They literally have no cash to spend and though asset rich, the effects of the Spanish economy are taking affect.I think Cesc has accepted that and will show full commitment to Arsenal.He is pivotal to any success we may achieve.His whole body language has changed, he looks generally much more content, and he can put to the back of his mind, at least for the time being any proposed move, and that for us is a good thing.Barca are disguising their troubles by saying yet again they have made no official approach to our club, purely to save face.

Lessons on accepting and providing the loving guidance your unique child needs can be hard to swallow at times — especially when, as I have, you experience a severe awakening that a large portion of your parenting style needs to change in order for your trusting relationship with your child to really blossom.

Estimates of the numbers of women booked for home birth but delivering in hospital were even more difficult to obtain because hospital records do not always specify this information accurately and no national estimate exists.1 4 Data collected in this region in 1983 suggested that 35 % of these women changed to hospital based care either before or during labour, and a more detailed prospective study of all planned home births in 1993 found a total transfer rate of 43 %.8 Women were classified as having booked for a home birth when a community midwife had accepted a woman for home delivery and had this arrangement accepted by her manager and supervisor of midwives at any stage in pregnancy, irrespective of any later change of plan.

As the Orfalea Foundation's School Food Initiative (SFI) worked with food service operations to implement scratch - cooking and fresh salad bars, SFI funded a county - wide school garden program at elementary schools in order to help students accept the changing food on the plate.

A cashier at Dick's Sporting Goods at Orland Park Place discovered too late that a customer who paid for a $ 3.99 purchase with a $ 100 bill had managed to retrieve that bill before accepting his change and leaving the store on April 1.

His program at Holy Trinity is telling us some important things about kids and school food — namely, that food doesn't need to be «dumbed down» for kids to accept it; that kids implicitly understand when deep care is being put into the preparation of their food and they respond with equal respect; and that improving school food can change kids» attitudes about food outside the school yard gates, as was the case with the student quoted by Chef Boundas who cut back on fast food now that he's eating healthful foods at lunch and learning about nutrition and cooking in Chef Boundas's kitchen.

Not every daycare provider will accept cloth diapers, but thanks to the efforts of parents like you, many providers are changing their mind about using cloth diapers at daycare!

Assuming Mr Clegg accepts the convention that, until and unless our voting system is changed, what matters is seats, then he is saying if Labour remains the largest party it should have a shot at staying in office.

Off topic question topics included whether the mayor and his wife have smoked marijuana inside Gracie Mansion, a Daily News call for the mayor to «accept responsibility for inflaming the police», whether the mayor believes he should apologize for comments on the police, whether the Democratic National Committee has expressed concerns about current mayoral / police friction as it considers Brooklyn as a site for the 2016 Democratic Convention, whether the mayor supports the recent Cuomo / Christie veto of legislation on the Port Authority, a pending state legislative bill on police disability pensions, the expected special election in the 11th Congressional District, whether the mayor believes there is a police slowdown, the dismay of the recently shot and wounded police officers at Mayor de Blasio's hospital visit, the possible change in the Staten Island Chuck / Groundhog Day ceremony, the meeting today between Police Commissioner Bratton and union leaders and how Mayor de Blasio envisions the current mayoral / police friction ending.