Sentences with phrase «accepts his claims at»

Only if you accept claims at face value, which is what religion usually does.

While he seems eager to talk to mainstream media, which accepts his claims at face value (and passes them along as accurate to the public), he has yet to respond to my e-mail inquires.

Not exact matches

The splash page you end up at through its Google search ad also plays with high - pressure sales tactics like claiming the «offer ends in 3 days» and «accepting only 8 more Canadians today!»

At the core of the disagreement is a claim by Boeing that Bombardier has cheated American trade rules by accepting subsidies from the Canadian government and selling its CSeries aircraft in the United States at below market priceAt the core of the disagreement is a claim by Boeing that Bombardier has cheated American trade rules by accepting subsidies from the Canadian government and selling its CSeries aircraft in the United States at below market priceat below market prices.

Due to the large number of these provisions, it's probably a good idea to hold off on filing your return if it includes any item that would have qualified for a deduction or credit that expired at the end of 2016, until you can determine whether that item was extended — and whether the IRS is ready to accept a return claiming that tax benefit.

They'll accept Lively's claims of being «vilified» and «attacked» without taking a single moment to look at the heinous and hurtful things that he says and does.

You speak as if you have done so yourself... or have you accepted at face value what Dawkins and many others claim: that there is no evidence of God?

A prolepsis, as he uses the notion, is simply a claim staked out in history, which, when and if history is fulfilled, will be verified or falsified, and which is of such a nature that those who in the meantime have accepted it will all along have been living appropriately to the truth that will at the end be discovered.

The atonement of the world is anticipated, Pannenberg says, in that those who accept the claim of the Cross and live for the unity that it promises are free to live at one with God and neighbor.

they would say point wands at you and claim you will get eaten by deatheaters if you did not accept their myth?

Reinforcing in advance the claim I have put forth at the end of Part Two, Hartshorne went on to point out: «Just as the Stoics said the ideal was to have good will toward all but not in such fashion as to depend in any [221] degree for happiness upon their fortunes or misfortunes, so Christian theologians, who scarcely accepted this idea in their ethics, nevertheless adhered to it in characterizing God.»

Society was by this time well prepared to accept this measure although it was claimed that it was not at all the same as marriage despite being modelled very closely on the Marriage Act.

And given the way in which sex and gender now lie at the heart of contemporary notions of identity, the law could effectively require churches to accept any and every identity claim of every person who passes through its doors.

I started accepting the label «atheist» when I realized it doesn't necessarily mean that at all, and also when I realized not only that the God claim could not be demonstrated, but also that there are sound reasons for doubting it.

After reading these blogs for several years now I can honestly say the posters who get the most heated and angry and violent in their comments at least claim to be Christians, though I will accept that some may be poe's or trolls.

It IS funny, because many people who claim that they are «scientific» just blindly accept «Corporate Science» aimed at keeping them logically ignorant, meaning, they can use logic and reason (and even rhetoric if you know your Trivium) to argue well for false ideas.

While trying to take the «pro-life» claim seriously, I have not accepted it at face value, but rather have conducted research to find evidence.

I call a great character one who by his actions and attitudes satisfies the claim of situations out of deep readiness to respond with his whole life, and in such a way that the sum of his actions and attitudes expresses at the same time the unity of his being in its willingness to accept responsibility.

«Considering the number of boys who were educated at St Peter's, the Verona Fathers absolutely do not accept that claims from 12 individuals demonstrate a culture of abuse at the seminary.»

The grounds on which church authorities resisted the advancing claims of the sciences were in the first place simply that they were at variance with the accepted teachings handed down from ancient times.

Why should any rational adult accept at face value a claim that if made about anything other than religion, would be scoffed at as a lie?

You see, we atheists have this thing about requiring proof before blindly accepting what — on the surface at least — sound like ridiculous claims.

In response to your question: «what would happen if someone claimed to have # 7, but doesn't seem to have # 8 - 10», I'd propose the following: — As an individual looking at my own life, if I observe # 8 (communion) isn't present (my prayer life isn't fruitful, I'm not thirsting for the word, etc), I need to take an honest look at # 7 — do I really understand my need for a Savior and did I really accept His grace.

I can not accept Jesus while at the same time accept the words you have spoken and claimed they are His... because they are not the same.

PS: It's also much easier to say «you're not going to accept what I have to say» instead of looking at the claim itself and saying «If an Islamic person offered me this argument, would I convert to Islam?»

I am willing to accept at face value the Benham's claims that in their professional capacity they do not discriminate against anyone.

My revised understanding of creativity allows us to accept Whitehead's doctrine of God at the same time as we claim that God is the sole source of each creature's esse.

'' That tells people that I am at least intelligent enough to require proof of existence» = > It does no such thing as you can not claim nor do you have evidence as to what is beyond measurement or accountability by accepted scientific method.

When Christians claim that a particular doctrine must be defended at all costs or else Christianity is doomed, those who can not accept the particular doctrine can hardly be blamed if they assume this must be so, and, as a consequence, surrender with reluctance all allegiance to the Christian faith.

How could we have accepted the challenge and taken the increased risks while at the same time refusing to accept the enormous cost that history claimed?

Ardent defenders of the Bible refused to accept these conclusions, and one of them, a zoologist named P. H. Gosse (1810 - 1888) admitted all the evidence of geology but claimed that at the creation God had deliberately placed the fossils in the rock so that men would later find them there.

You want us to reject the explanations I listed for logical reasons and then want us to accept the bibles claims which are illogical at their foundation.

Frs Hanvey and Carroll accept that it can not be applied «completely», but it surely can not be applied at all, if one accepts the claims of the Church and the teaching authority of Jesus Christ.

There is an item in today's Australian by Damon Kitney and Andrew White - «We are an oligopoly economy: Robb», describing opposition finance spokesman, Andrew Robb's, statements at the Global Food Forum series in Sydney, that Australians «should not be opposed to create national champion's and claiming «Australians need to accept that the nation is an «oligopoly economy»».

And Purdue may have a hard time accepting the behavior of coach Jim Colletto, at least as alleged by Ryan Harmon, the former lineman who claims to have suffered such humiliation during two seasons in West Lafayette that he was driven to wanting to kill himself.

The faux «loyalty» that Wenger claims, in humbug style, to show, is ONLY to his own power, salary and his inability to do anything else outside football, which at 68, most people of his age have to accept.

The Daily Star claims that he would be willing to accept a four - year deal worth around # 6m - a-season at United.

The report claims that the Colombia international has accepted that he won't be playing at Manchester United or Monaco next season and, given his familiarity with the Spanish league following his two seasons with Atletico Madrid, is keen on a return to La Liga.

Even though Gündogan himself has stated on Facebook that he was not planning to leave Borussia Dortmund, Germans media claim that he won't accept an extension of his contract at Borussia and that he's on the move.

Of course these are the same kind of baseless claims made by all of the bottle manufacturers, and I knew better to accept them at face value.

Sensing that this assertion carried little moral weight, Dayan then argued that while Israel was willing to accept partition in 1948, and at that time accepted the Palestinian's moral claim to some of the land, the Palestinians then lost this claim by engaging in violence.

Allardyce was also at the centre of a 2006 Panorama programme which featured two agents claiming he had accepted bungs for signing players.

NEW YORK (WBEN / AP)-- A federal prosecutor told a jury Tuesday that a former top aide to New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo accepted more than $ 300,000 in bribes, but defense attorneys belittled the claim, saying the bulk of the money was his wife's salary at a legitimate job.

Off topic questions included a Department of Investigations report detailing problems with corrections officers at Rikers Island, de Blasio's message to protestors resuming anti-NYPD protests, his relationship with police unions, a call by the head of the Lieutentants Benevolent Association to strengthen laws concerning resisting arrest, an increase in police protection for Jewish organizations and sites and Dov Hikind's claim of a decrease in police presence, delays in the implementation of the City's municipal ID card program, his message to PBA members dissatisfied with their union leadership, his position on a city council plan to fund the purchase of additional bullet - proof vests for police officers, whether the Democratic National Committee has expressed concerns around the recent protests as it considers whether to hold the 2016 convention in Brooklyn, whether his «thoughts» on the anti-NYPD protests have «evolved» and whether he will direct the NYPD to change its FOIL request process to accept email or other electronic requests.

Finally, when Long took the podium to accept her nomination, she like the previous speakers took digs at the incumbent, Charles Schumer.Long called him the face of the ruling class which has harmed the same middle class he now claims to champion.

No 10 backs potty - mouthed defence minister Anna Soubry, saying PM accepts her claim she did not shout «sanctimonious c ***» at Ed Miliband

Her claims are somewhat difficult to accept at face value, however, in light of the three discriminatory pieces of legislation that she push... Read

He claims Democratic operatives misrepresented themselves as Conservatives while carrying petitions for the Conservative opponent of Kearns — an official pariah at Democratic Headquarters after the Democratic assemblyman accepted the GOP line in his run for county clerk.

Those hypothetical facts included core claims at the trial — whether Venditto lied to town attorneys, whether he accepted bribes, whether he knew if the town backing loans for Singh violated the state constitution.

He quotes a caller claiming to be unemployed who rang LBC before Christmas to say that he would not accept a job because he was expected to start at 8 am.