«Chevron
accepts the consensus in the scientific communities on climate change,» he said last week.
Not exact matches
Perhaps someone with the stature and wisdom of Solomon will emerge and find a way to develop a framework
in which both sides could
accept each other within an agreed
consensus.
All
accept the Qur» an and the sunnah (Muhammad's example) as foundational but differ on the importance of
consensus in collective scholarly reasoning (ijma) and individual analogical reasoning (qiyas).
I have to say I am not a historian or a serious Biblical scholar, so am not
in a position to assess — or even be aware of — all the various claims and counter claims, but I'm basically happy to
accept this
consensus.
The quest for total
consensus is an illusion, and indeed there is no reason to
accept majority rule
in such a matter if the majority does not share one's premises.
By nature, the present President of America has that element
in him — I should not be saying this but I am being inherently made to convey this as comment of exception for America and for Obama whose whole (Obama and his better half) stand as an extension through the ex Presidential candidate's Charisma Of the Secretary Hillary Clinton that President Obama's Charisma has selflessly absorbed for function
in the cabinet gracefully for America and the world.That shows the humbleness of President Obama and maturity of Hillary Clinton of acceptance without a feeling of high and low of ego regarded as exceptional
in Divinity.I was not supposed to make this comment and I have done so to urge the Republicans to
accept their Light within of
consensus through individual projections under control as Obama's gesture of bipartisanship that will come to address.
In short, this comment is all about health and health care where economics alone does not come into the picture with a rigorous analysis on it but should also extend as leverage to the person
in play (Obama) who is also selflessly poised with corrections on it over the infra structure of it that he has proposed for approval as ego of his working element as the executive public ally chosen as the President that had appealed to the public at large voting even putting behind able dleaers like McCain?George W Bush was the last to steer America into the Light over the past of America and that stands as the subtle truth even today as on date with Bill Clinton the ex President of America giving support through his excellent independent caliber for Obama ultimately to head the show of America that was time bound of its reality that sees no barriers and to which he
accepted well
in his individual capacity as the free lance ex President of America.
Perhaps the nearest thing to
consensus, one which did become practically effective, was the
consensus of the learned doctors of Islam; and this has been still further reduced to the agreement among the learned doctors of the four
accepted schools of thought
in Islam.
By 1980, however, the somewhat chastened magazine acknowledged he was not: «God is making a comeback Most intriguingly, this is happening not among theologians or ordinary believers — most of whom never
accepted for a moment that he was
in any serious trouble — but
in the crisp, intellectual circles of academic philosophers, where the
consensus had long banished the Almighty from fruitful discourse.»
this blog is not working with me... I'll have to catch you guys on another post... it will not
accept long post... This is my main point against the scientific method argument; it is
consensus in the scientific community that most of our Universe is unseen.
The biblical theology to which he refers emerged after World War II as a
consensus with certain characteristics: (1) the Bible is assumed to be relevant for modern men and women; (2) biblical criticism is to be
accepted; (3) the message of the Bible is a unity, if a unity
in diversity; (4) revelation is historical encounter rather than right doctrine; (5) the biblical (Hebraic) mentality is distinctive.
We shouldn't HAVE to wonder if our potential leaders
accept the scientific
consensus on issues, but many of them DO N'T whether
in truth or for political reasons.
It is surprising to me that it is often the activists who speak up
in support of the scientific
consensus around climate change (i.e. that there is overwhelming scientific evidence that climate change is induced by humans and is happening), who are the same activists who don't
accept the scientific
consensus and evidence that shows that GM crops can be safe.
There is one prospect that has been
accepted by most as the
consensus WR1
in the draft, even after his poor combine performance: Calvin Ridley.
Mirroring this, Jim Murphy's interview with the Guardian,
in which he has outlined a willingness to
accept # 5bn
in defence cuts, adds to this growing
consensus.
Should the unthinkable happen, and Owen Smith be elected Labour leader, the party would lurch to the right ahead of the 2020 General Election
in an attempt to triangulate both the Conservatives and UKIP, being tougher on welfare than the Tories, being tougher on migrants than the Tories,
accepting the economic
consensus as it is — regardless of how many people it left behind.
Others have become more sceptical after reading the work of scientists who refuse to
accept the broad
consensus in their community about climate change.
Phil — New Labour
in 1997 showed one way to win over the suburbs, smaller towns and cities
in the South, the East and the Midlands to Labour, and did so exactly as you say: by
accepting the Thatcher economic
consensus but promising a «fairer» society.
«The
consensus is the governor's office did not hold up its end of the agreement when we
accepted their request to stand down
in return for the release of fiscal information about the planned DOT regional capital program for Long Island after Cuomo's budget release.
«Instead at about the time the elections was scheduled to begin we were informed that a list of 4,704
consensus candidates had been presented to and
accepted by the Committee as Ward officers for all the 147 Wards
in Zamfara State.»
«I'm very confident that at the end of the day there will be a resolution
accepted by
consensus that will maintain a program of research and that will call for a review of progress
in a number of years,» says Daulaire.
«I was pleasantly surprised by the fact that there were unanimous decisions about most issues, and strong
consensus on the others,» says Ron Fouchier, a flu virologist at Erasmus Medical Center
in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, whose study has been
accepted by the journal Science.
I agree that true skepticism is an integral part of the scientific method — but want to emphasize that it is practiced by those who do
accept the
consensus, not just by those
in opposition.
The study also finds that Tea Party supporters with higher levels of education are less likely to trust scientists or
accept scientific
consensus on topics like evolution or climate change, which runs opposite to the positive effect education has on trust
in science among Independents and Democrats.
There is a finely graded inverse association between age and cognitive performance, 3 4 5 but the age at which cognitive decline becomes evident at the population level remains the subject of debate.5 6 7 A recent review of the literature concluded that there was little evidence of cognitive decline before the age of 60.8 This point of view, however, is not universally
accepted.5 6 Clinicopathological studies show good correlation between neuropathology and the severity of cognitive decline, 9 10 11 and neurofibrillary tangles and amyloid plaques, the hallmarks of pathology, are known to be present
in the brains of young adults.12 13 Emerging
consensus on the long gestation period of dementia14 15 also suggests that adults aged under 60 are likely to experience age related cognitive decline.
The next year, as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was publishing its second major assessment of climate science, Shell found itself
in a delicate balancing act between
accepting the scientific
consensus and arguing that there was still too much uncertainty to dictate aggressive action.
I have looked at Quackwatch and it is quite apparent to me that Stephen Barrett's knowledge base would be
in tune with medical and nutrition
consensus from 50 years ago.
In other words, woefully outdated.To give one example, Dr Robert Lustig's research linking fructose consumption to obesity has been universally
accepted by the medical profession and nutritionists.It is quite evident he had not eve heard of such research.
In the end, we may need to accept the fact that the school's - and the state's - role in this domain is simply limited: by its meager portion of children's lives, by its pedagogical weakness, by the absence of political and intellectual consensus, and by the modest capabilities of state standards and test
In the end, we may need to
accept the fact that the school's - and the state's - role
in this domain is simply limited: by its meager portion of children's lives, by its pedagogical weakness, by the absence of political and intellectual consensus, and by the modest capabilities of state standards and test
in this domain is simply limited: by its meager portion of children's lives, by its pedagogical weakness, by the absence of political and intellectual
consensus, and by the modest capabilities of state standards and tests.
NSCS instills
in its 21st century learners personal habits important
in the work place:
accepting responsibility for personal decisions and actions; honesty, courage, and integrity; leadership; a healthy lifestyle; empathy, courtesy, and respect for differences among people; reflection; self - confidence; concentration and perseverance; responsible time management; assuming a fair share of the work load; and working cooperatively with others to reach group
consensus.
Here's part of the problem: Scientists are human, just like you and me, and they occasionally defend wrong ideas because they propagated
in a time where some novel but wrong papers / books were written, and seemed right at the time, and the
consensus accepted them, because it agreed with their biases.
After the numerous shows organized by us
in China this year, the
consensus is high and well
accepted in the public here of the extra group.
And I could not help but notice a theme common to both works: the potential dangers involved
in uncritically
accepting a widely held
consensus view.
At any given point
in time, a theory was
accepted by a
consensus — until new information came to light.
«EPA is relying most heavily on these synthesis reports because they... 3) have been reviewed and formally
accepted by, commissioned by, or
in some cases authored by, U.S. government agencies and individual government scientists and provide EPA with assurances that this material has been well vetted by both the climate change research community and by the U.S. government; and 4)
in many cases, they reflect and convey the
consensus conclusions of expert authors.»
In this sort of environment, the «money» is with the
consensus — If the researcher wants funding (and virtually all of us are dependent on it), the easy road to funding is to decorate one's proposals with the
accepted «
consensus buzz words».
«What we saw today was one oil company begrudgingly
accept the scientific
consensus while trying to overemphasize the extent of scientific uncertainty,» San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera said
in a statement.
Does Richard Alley still believe that the LIA was characterized by NH temps falling 1 - 2C over an extended period as he did
in 1998 while doing his paleo studies, or has he invalidated his own data and
accepted the more
consensus view (Gavin et al) that it was a far milder event (approx -.3) as stated
in the op?
But sometimes
consensus just means that there is a
consensus of skeptics (e.g., Wegener's theory of continental drift was proposed
in 1912 based on continent shapes but was not widely
accepted until 50 years later because the smoking gun — deep sea rifts — hadn't been discovered) or there is
consensus because the data is overwhelming (e.g., descent with modification).
oit is with indignation that we are speaking othis document is not acceptable • Bolivia owe have learned about this document through the media, not through you onow we are given 60 minutes to
accept something already agreed upon by other states owe are seeing actions
in a dictatorial way othis is unacceptable and anti-democratic owe say to the people of the world: they shall judge upon it othe rights of our people are not being respected owe are not going to decide about so many lives
in only 60 minutes othis is s group of a small number of countries oAPPLAUS • Cuba o4 hours ago Obama announced an agreement which is non-existant owe is behaving like an emperor owe have seen version being discussed by secretive groups
in the last hours and days oCuba will not
accept your draft declaration oat this conference, there is no
consensus on this document oI associate my voice to Tuvalu, Venezuela, Bolivia othe target of 2 degrees is unacceptable o... • Costa Rica ofor the reasons that we have heard, this document can not be considered the work of the AWG - LCA and can not be considered by the COP othis can only be an INF doc, it's just for information oadditional question:
in an earlier version, a CP.15 - decision, para. 1: there was a reference to a legally binding instrument to be adopted by the COP onow: we have a new version, but the reference to legally binding instrument disappeared • USA o [wants to speak, but point of order by Nicaragua] • Nicaragua othere is already a precedent where we have not been given the right to speech onow that you have mentioned we finally want to speak • Pres. [moving on] oUS does not appear on my list any more, so next one is Sudan • Sudan othere must be something horribly wrong here oI pushed the button when I saw Nicaragua raising their sign
in order to support them • Nicaragua othis is a deterioration of the democratic system oand this happens at the most important conference of the UN for many years owe have draft decisions about how to carry forward the process ostates (lists names) have written a submission: • this has not followed the basic principles of the UN • inclusion • bottom up processes • democratic participation • equality of states oduring this consequence, many states expressed their position against such approaches othe only agreement we recognize is??
As we documented
in our paper, research has also shown that when people are aware of the expert
consensus on human - caused global warming, they're more likely to
accept the science and support climate policy to address the problem.
But he later contacted Guardian Australia to say that he
accepts the science of global warming which
in his view does not present any
consensus that human beings contribute to global warming.
It seems that most people
accepted York's comments as tongue
in cheek albeit with a (negative) twist of lemon as pertaining to the climate
consensus / advocates.
In short, the more that people perceived scientific
consensus, the more they
accepted scientific findings.
He had claimed he found 34 abstracts
in the scientific mainstream that did not
accept the
consensus position that humans are causing rapid climate changes.
For me, that begins with people
accepting that there is no hiding place left
in the science — the overwhelming
consensus of the vast body of scientists that study climate is that the trends we are seeing
in the air, the oceans and
in our ecosystems are entirely consistent with the theory of global warming, while the alternatives offered by sceptical scientists — even the much heralded role of the Sun — so far fail that test.
In 2006 year - end interviews and especially after the release of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report in February 2007, Harper finally appeared to accept the scientific consensu
In 2006 year - end interviews and especially after the release of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report
in February 2007, Harper finally appeared to accept the scientific consensu
in February 2007, Harper finally appeared to
accept the scientific
consensus.
Large majorities
in every major nation on the planet
accept the scientific
consensus that humans are causing climate change.
Obviously it is not tenable to reject the ocean oscillation argument when applied to the solar theory but
accept in when applied to CO2, but this is what the
consensus scientists are effectively doing.
«What we saw today was one oil company begrudgingly
accept the scientific
consensus while trying to overemphasize the extent of scientific uncertainty,» Herrera said
in a statement.
Of all evolutionary biology papers
in the sample 75 % explicitly or implicitly
accept the
consensus view on evolution.
This is
accepted without question
in the
consensus IPCC literature.