Sentences with phrase «accepts this view from»

Satinover apparently accepts this view from neuroscience as an account of the most comprehensive scientific worldview.

Not exact matches

Don't accept it from a point of view of weakness, but accept it from a point of view of strength.

In April 2016, they were accepted to the accelerator program at Y Combinator in Mountain View, California, and received a $ 120,000 cash injection (they had previously raised $ 330,000 from friends and family).

A few days later, while arguing that his personal feelings on the matter should not affect the ultimate decision to accept or reject the proposal, he stated, «from my [point of view] it seems that the community's feeling on this issue isalready [sic] clear.»

Giving three extra seats on the board to the CEO was certainly founder friendly; that the expansion happened at the same time Uber accepted a $ 3.5 billion investment from Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund, which came with a board seat, suggests Benchmark viewed the board expansion as a way to protect its own interests and influence as well.

I said it to hotair already, but I will expand it a bit for you: what is evidence for some is not accepted by everyone; just as in a court case, some jurors are convinced with very little evidence while some people can not be convinced of something no matter how much evidence there is... much of this comes from how you were raised and your own personal world view, for many people God does not fit into their world view so whatever evidence there is they close their eyes and say, «No, I don't believe that!»

The kindergarten logic of the believer that those who accept big bang as the furthest back we can go in this iteration of the Universe means they think «something can't come from nothing» is as much a misrepresentation of Hawkins» view of the cosmos as your articulation of his view of pansp.ermia was.

He accepted Kant's view that the ordered world is created by the human mind and then pointed out that the way the mind orders the world varies from culture to culture and evolves within individual cultures.

He said that by implicitly accepting a complainant's allegations as true without fully investigating, the Church risked a flood of allegations from «unscrupulous» complainants who viewed it as «a source of easy money».

For the faithful in Christ can not accept this view, which holds either that after Adam there existed men on this earth who did not receive their origin by natural generation from him, the first parent of all, or that Adam signifies some kind of multiple first parents; for it is by no means apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with what the sources of revealed truth and the acts of the magisterium of the Church teach about original sin, which proceeds from a sin truly committed by one Adam, and which is transmitted to all by generation, and exists in each one as his own» -LCB- Humani Generis 37).

Like the American Negroes who adopted the word «black» from the enemy and flung it back, or the feminists who accept «witch» and «bitch» as badges of honor, Dobson and Hindson are in a mood and movement that take fundamentalism back as a banner for pride and boasting and wave it in the faces of the, in their view, waning evangelicals.

This can be done from many points of view, but I have suggested above that the crucial attack is that which accepts the same data and then shows that the argument does not exclude the presence of contingent elements in God's total nature.

I have called this the coup de culture, in which Judeo / Christian moral philosphy (which is different from religious faith), the once generally accepted value system of the West is being supplanted by a (roughly) utilitarian / hedonistic (not in the sensual sense) / scientism - radical environmentalism view of life.

In view of the central importance of this doctrine it matters less whether it is readily accepted by our contemporaries, provided that its message is not interpreted in a narrow, selfishly individualistic sense, but that the gracious divine act which opens man to God is from the beginning understood also as creating authentic community among men.

Assuming these traits are fundamental to the American political mind, most political theorists see this as reflecting the classical liberal mind — distinct from the «modern liberal» view which accepts the legitimacy of the welfare state — not a conservative mind.

It is, however, basically compatible with a Whiteheadian world view, in my judgment, provided that one accepts a key point on which I differ, if not from Whitehead, at least from some Whiteheadians.

Many Christians accepted the call to justice and righteousness in society without changing their views that social concern and action flowed forth in a secondary way from personal salvation.

You and I may differ from some of his understandings, but in the course of the stimulation he provides, it is equally our individual responsibility to weigh and test his views against the Bible and then decide what we accept as truth and what not.

It is probable that ancient men used the word «spirit» rather differently from us, for an unseen spiritual world was an accepted part of their world - view.

From a Protestant point of view, it can not be accepted.

Having stated his thesis that one must begin with Whitehead's diagnosis, Rorty quotes him as follows: «The difficulties of all schools of modern philosophy lie in the fact that having accepted the subjectivist principle, they continue to use philosophical categories derived from another point of view» (PR 253; WEP 134; italics mine).

Even in the Catholic, and not only in the Protestant view of the relation between God and man the freedom of the latter as derived only from himself is guilty and imprisoned egoism; hence as far as he is concerned, this freedom refuses to accept God's self - communication and to let God be God.

When he accepts this point of view he is in a position to receive help from other alcoholics and from the Higher Power — God (Norman Vincent Peale, The Power of Positive Thinking [New York: Prentice - Hall, Inc., 1952], p. 230; bold face added).

Rationalists have admired the way that Niebuhr diagnosed the forms of pride and have even accepted his view about anxiety; but they have recoiled from this final paradox of original sin.

Apparently, she had mentioned two women that had entered into what they termed a «covenant friendship», which the guy from Exodus termed a «sexless marriage» as it had all the trappings of a marriage without the sexual relationship as they accepted the view that gay sex was sinful.

We shall return to Jeremias's work on the parables again and again, for it is epoch - making in several respects, but for the moment we want only to call attention to the consequences of this work so far as a general view of the nature of the synoptic tradition is concerned the success of Jeremias's work demands that we accept his starting - point, namely, that any parable as it now stands in the gospels represents the teaching of the early Church and the way back from the early Church to the historical Jesus is a long and arduous one.

Indeed, on accepting this view of the tradition, one's first impulse is simply to give up the ghost and content oneself with selecting from the earlier strata of the tradition such teaching as is in keeping with one's overall view of the historical Jesus, making no systematic attempt to defend the authenticity of each saying used.

Earlier writers had recognized that Volkmar went too far in his attempted demonstration of Mark's dependence upon Paul — he found evidence of such dependence on almost every page of the Gospel — but his view was such a welcome relief from the one - sided Tübingen theory, according to which Mark was a «neutral» in the great apostolic controversy over Jewish Christianity, that the main thesis of Volkmar was accepted without careful scrutiny of his supporting arguments.

We may admit this without the wistful feeling that only classical man could honestly believe in the Gospel, and that we are debarred from accepting it because of the change in our world view.

In her view, the immediate challenge for congregational study is to make abundantly clear that though it is dissociated from those who write off the congregation, it is also dissociated from those who romanticize it, and whose view of it is «entirely complacent, accepting and benign.»

They are more inclined to accept explanations from official sources, from «experts,» from company officials, from well prepared hand - outs created by public relations experts, than to go to the trouble to dig out opposing views that often are represented by small, inefficient, underfinanced and even unpopular groups.

I think this is wrong and therefore I write from this point of view... To accept the idea that they are different and to say institutions do not really have an ethical responsibility is wrong.

Yet from a biblical point of view, the refusal to accept the promising character of mystery is the fundamental meaning of sin.

This reference did not tempt me in 1914 to look up Clifford, but I evidently reconstructed his position from what Pearson did accept of his views on matter, as more acceptable to me than Pearson's.

I do not believe in Trinity like most Christians accept it, so that from my perspective would surely not be one of the views.

If this view be accepted it carries with it the implication that the evangelist was not himself an apostle, but had available information from an original disciple, perhaps in written form, and that he wrote while this disciple was still alive (19:35, 21:24).

For Whitehead sees Bradley's theory as flawed because «he accepts the language which is developed from another point of view» (ESP 117; cf. PR 167), i.e., he makes the «sensationalist assumption» (PR 190) that feeling is only analyzable in terms of universals.

This was also the Roman view: Hebrews is absent from the Muratorian list and was not accepted by Hippolytus, Gaius or Novatian.

The ACCC says it will accept information from anonymous sources and treat all submissions confidentially, with a view to issuing draft findings in September.

«Purely from a financial point of view the shareholders should accept; the track record of current management does not justify a higher price,» Mr Spalvins said.

Those programs are therefore considered by the organic movement as having a sound and credible criterion to ensure organic integrity of products accepted under their program, from the standard point of view.

People will have their own views on this, but we have to accept that Wenger will simply not walk away from the Emirates, nor will Stan Kroenke or any other board members get rid of him; unless there is a remarkable U-turn from either party, Wenger will see out the last year of his contract.

Interesting from the point of view that several on here have been spinning the «no - one accept Sanchez» would get near this team.

Thanks to the fact that they accept contributions from writers and bloggers across the world, this site is a melting pot for a variety of fresh perspectives and views.

I accept guest posting here on Views From a Step Stool and over on The Mommy View (all things parenting).

It is about finding a psychological identity that is separate from parents — that they have a role in the family or at school, they know what that treasured and valued role is, and that they do feel accepted and loved but also a bit «separate», a bit ready to take a view on something... there is a shift toward the child having real opinions about the world, that may be different than the parent's view, and that in this view that the child has a continuous self and therefore can participate in learning.

Yet attempts to forecast these consequences are invariably made from a point of view that unwittingly accepts two questionable assumptions.

From what NPF members say, this is indeed a problem, even where, such as in health and transport policy, front benchers would willingly accept a range of views being presented as options.

Mr Daudu's view implies that once the Supreme Court has delivered a decision, all are bound not merely to accept it as constituting an authoritative statement of the law of the land, but also immediately to accord it intellectual obeisance, and to undertake not to dissent publicly from that decision no matter how implausible or even improper it may seem.

I recognize that because electronic voting is a departure from the traditional and accepted way of voting today it is inherently viewed more susceptible than electronic voting.