Sentences with phrase «access court decisions»

It is ultimately a matter for the judge to apply the law in each individual case, but it would be helpful for both members of the legal profession and expert alike to be able to access court decisions in such difficult cases, including in the County Court and Court of Protection, to be able to enrich their understanding of the application of MCA 2005 in practice.

Not exact matches

Boeing had taken Denmark to court over a lack of access to documents used in the government's decision to buy the Lockheed Martin jets.

The watchdog, Roskomnadzor, said on Monday it had begun blocking access to Telegram, implementing a decision by a Russian court.

Soon after Daniela Barbosa Assunção de Souza, a judge in Rio de Janeiro state, told mobile operators to stymie access to the Facebook - owned (fb) messaging app, the chief justice of Brazil's supreme court suspended her decision.

«Not since before Roe v. Wade has a law or court decision had the potential to devastate access to reproductive healthcare on such a sweeping scale,» Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, told Bloomberg earlier this year.

The court's decision will allow more room for innovation, and consumers will have more choices to determine for themselves how they access and experience the internet,» Verizon's general counsel of public policy, law and security, Randal Milch, said after the ruling was handed down.

In 2008, the FCC sanctioned Comcast (cmcsa) for slowing customers» access to the video sharing network BitTorrent, for example, though a court later struck down the decision.

We will have to await the court decision, but my guess is that the simsub solution to retain ad revenues in Canada will be given a good hard look as part of the Trudeau government's ongoing cultural review and that, because of the changing way in which consumers access content, its days may be numbered.

A federal appeals court decision allowing girls of any age to buy emergency contraception without a prescription won't immediately change access.

Councillor Toby Neal at Nottingham City Council was quoted by the Nottingham Post as saying: «Whilst respecting the court's decision, I feel the judge has missed the point of us bringing this action, which was to protect people from feeling bullied and intimidated while accessing hospital services - something we don't welcome in our city.»

Today, the United States Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments in the state of California's appeal of a Ninth Circuit decision declaring unconstitutional a statute enacted in that state which restricted minors» access to graphically violent video games....

Overturning a lower court's decision that ruled that the laws unconstitutionally limited access to abortion in the state, New Orleans - based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals judges wrote, «on its face does not impose an undue burden on the life and health of a woman.&rcourt's decision that ruled that the laws unconstitutionally limited access to abortion in the state, New Orleans - based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals judges wrote, «on its face does not impose an undue burden on the life and health of a woman.&rCourt of Appeals judges wrote, «on its face does not impose an undue burden on the life and health of a woman.»

However, the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Roe v. Wade indicates that the government can't put an «undue burden» on abortion access up to that point.

We also oppose provisions of the bill that expand the immigration detention system and erode the basic rights afforded to immigrants, including the provisions that allow for the indefinite detention of individuals who can not be deported to their home countries; that expedite removal proceedings or automatically imprison immigrants without providing them access to attorneys or judges; that increase detention capacity by an additional 20,000 beds to house immigrants awaiting their day in court; and that diminish the checks and balances of judicial review over immigration decisions.

In a decision that should chill the blood of everyone who believes in religious freedom, the court stated: «That the new rules prohibit all improper reasons for refusal to dispense medication... suggests that the purpose of the new rules was not to eliminate religious objections to delivery of lawful medicines but to eliminate all objections that do not ensure patient health, safety, and access to medication.

The U.S. District Court Judge decision missed the main point of the lawsuit, that the unfavorable Georgia ballot access precedents do not relate to presidential elections.

Assembly Democrats want to guarantee access to abortion for New York state residents if the Supreme Court overturns the landmark Roe v. Wade decision.

It has been more than 24 hours since U.S. District Court Judge Algenon Marbley enjoined the Ohio ballot access law for newly - qualifying parties, and no mainstream news media in Ohio (or anywhere else) has yet mentioned the decision.

During his time at the Pride Agenda he has been actively involved with the passage of dozens of laws, ordinances, regulations and Executive Orders on the state and local level affecting New York's LGBT community, including statewide measures like: the Sexual Orientation Non-Discrimination Act; the Hate Crimes Act of 2000; making the state's 9/11 relief inclusive of same - sex couples; guaranteeing domestic partners hospital visitation, legal authority over a loved one's bodily remains, access to Family Court and medical decision making authority; prohibiting discrimination on the basis of gender identity and expression in state employment; and securing over $ 50 million of funding for LGBT health and human services.

It has now been three days since a U.S. District Court in Los Angeles invalidated California's law on how a party gets on the ballot, and the only news sources that have reported the decision are Rick Hasen's ElectionLawBlog, and Ballot Access News, and the web page of the ACLU of Southern California.

A source close to the campaign said that they did not expect a decision for several days, and anticipated that the first appearance in court would be spent most fighting some of the Cuomo team's subpoenas, which request access to her medical history and other highly personal information.

«Dominic Ayine, the Deputy Minister for Justice who represented the Government in the Supreme Court and opposed my application, and others, went public with the electronic and print media to mount unconstitutional and contumacious attacks and insults on the Court decision and on my person for daring to access the Court.»

«Somebody is generally going to be unhappy with a judge's decision,» she said of a court that is often called upon to split the baby, or at least access to the baby.

I don't ask about their documents, thanks to a 1982 Supreme Court decision which guarantees equal access to education regardless of immigration status.

The Supreme Court's 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision, which mandated the desegregation of public schools, gave the executive branch a legal precedent for enforcing equal access to education.

At least since the Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954, this has been interpreted to give the federal government the power to intervene in cases of legally sanctioned discrimination, like the segregation of public schools across the country; to mandate equal access to education for students with disabilities; and, according to some arguments, to correct for persistently unequal access to resources across states and districts of different income levels.

But despite a series of unanimous Supreme Court decisions meant to reverse this trend, in the ensuing years large numbers of black students failed to gain access to the best programs the newly integrated schools offered.

Three years later in Little Rock, Ark., despite the Supreme Court's decision that segregation violated the Constitution, nine young Black students were denied access to a public high school by segregationist Governor Orval Faubus.

Foundations like the one I'm a part of (the Laura and John Arnold Foundation) are pushing for the expansion of access to evidence - based risk assessments to help courts make better release or detention decisions.

In a 4 - 3 decision, the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled the state had an affirmative obligation to provide Connecticut's school children with a substantially equal educational opportunity and that this constitutionally guaranteed right encompasses the access to a public education, which is not substantially and materially impaired by racial and ethnic isolation.

A judge's recent decision brought an end — for now — to the Authors Guild v. Google court case concerning copyright issues as they pertained to Google's attempts to preserve and provide access to millions of global titles, most of them locked away in far - reaching international and academic libraries.

House legislation to reverse a federal court decision on state interest rate caps would increase access to credit, not expand predatory lending as critics have argued.

This morning, a federal district court judge overturned the Department of Health and Human Services» decision to maintain limits on access to Plan B contraception by girls under the age of 17.

«This decision will help inform courts and legislatures in Texas, Hawaii, California, Oregon, and other places where the Surfrider Foundation is actively fighting for beach access.»

Routes to appeal should be defined and decisions should come into force immediately in order to avoid incumbents delaying network access, for example, by entering into lengthy court processes.

Aside from the merits of the decision, which puts the cost of the courts not just on the users but on all the taxpayers (which may be the appropriate place for them), it is amusing to see high - priced lawyers say that access to justice is greatly improved because of the abolition of hearng fees that are less per day than the lawyers charge per hour.

Greater results seem likely with more minor (and cost free or relatively free steps) such as: remove restrictions on the access to non-secret government documents (court decisions etc.), and allow anyone who wants to operate an ISP to do so.

I clicked on the «Settled Principles» tab to find 30 well - settled principles for public records, such as this statement from a California appellate decision, «[I] t is well established that the media has no greater right of access to public records than the general public,» and this from a Florida court, «It is well - settled that public records and reports or business records are admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule provided they are authenticated by a custodian.»

In a significant win for access to justice in environmental matters, the Court's Grand Chamber found that Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights (the right to an effective remedy), read together with the Aarhus Convention, precluded the application of national procedural rules allowing for swift decision - making at the expense of rights granted to environmental NGOs.

In view of this, it could be argued that for the Court public access to documents requests have become not only a tool to unveil potential conflicts of interests after a decision has been adopted, but possibly also a preventive mechanism to ensure the a priori impartiality of decision - makers.

The Court referred to the purpose of access to environmental information as expressed in recital 2 of the Aarhus Regulation, which is to promote more effective public participation in the decision - making process, increase the accountability of decision - making and contribute to public awareness and support for the decisions taken.

This decision, from the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal in November, is the first appeal court decision that addresses law enforcement's ability to access to customer name and address data from an internet service provider without a warCourt of Appeal in November, is the first appeal court decision that addresses law enforcement's ability to access to customer name and address data from an internet service provider without a warcourt decision that addresses law enforcement's ability to access to customer name and address data from an internet service provider without a warrant.

Chief Justice McLachlin (who has been outspoken on this exact topic before) penned a majority decision interpreting broadly the necessary implications of s. 96 of the Constitution Act to extend to a constitutional mandate to protect access to justice and prevent choking it off through high court fees.

The blog also provides free access to the Illinois Insurance Index, a database maintained by Jill Berkeley that summarizes all major appellate insurance coverage decisions in Illinois, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and a few other jurisdictions, issued from 1986 through the present.»

In the days of electronic access, judicial decisions (and sometimes other court records that have always been public in principle) no longer benefit from practical obscurity.

Does the fact that the national court was bound by the Commission's decision establishing the anticompetitive practice constitute an infringement of the right to access to a tribunal?

As Supreme Court scholars await the March 4 release of the late Justice Harry Blackmun's papers, Supreme Court reporter Tony Mauro writes in Legal Times about the decision by Blackmun's daughter Sally, to give exclusive pre-release access to the papers to reporters Linda Greenhouse of the New York Times and Nina Totenberg of National Public -LSB-...]

In a case decided yesterday by the General Court this tension between secrecy needed for the effective conduct of negotiations and the right of citizens to be informed was readily apparent in determining whether the Commission was acting lawfully in its decision to refuse access to documents related to those negotiations to European Member of Parliament Sophie in «t Veld.

This model is unique, even in Canada, but has delivered open access to close to a million legal decisions from all the courts and tribunals in Quebec.

As Supreme Court scholars await the March 4 release of the late Justice Harry Blackmun's papers, Supreme Court reporter Tony Mauro writes in Legal Times about the decision by Blackmun's daughter Sally, to give exclusive pre-release access to the papers to reporters Linda Greenhouse of the New York Times and Nina Totenberg of National Public Radio.