State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed a letter with the Federal Communications Commission regarding its proposed rulemaking to establish privacy rules for Broadband Internet
Access Service providers, offering several recommendations designed to maximize consumer choice, transparency, and security.
Alerts received as text messages on your mobile access device may incur a charge from your mobile
access service provider.
«If it is easy to
access my service provider, I feel that provider is more in tune with my needs,» he says.
«The CENTRE Token, in addition to its other uses (such as
accessing the service provider protocol), provides a way for wallets which have no fiat tokens in common to transact, as they will be able to use CENTRE Tokens to obtain the needed fiat token in common to transact.»
Not exact matches
At the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas earlier this month, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler signaled that he would heed President Obama's call to preserve net neutrality — that is, treat broadband internet
service providers as utilities (subject to more rigorous regulation than previously) to maintain equal
access for all to the internet.
TEHRAN, Iran — Iranian authorities have ordered internet
service providers to block
access to Telegram, a popular messaging app used by an estimated 40 million Iranians, state TV reported Monday.
In one case, a personal care
provider in Vermont submitted bogus claims for 456 hours of
service to an elderly man and then secretly split the payments with the patient's wife in return for
access to her husband's prescription pain killers.
Rather, they are attempts to keep consumers within companies» digital ecosystems, allowing users to
access products and
services from other retailers and
providers but through Apple's or Google's or Amazon's platforms.
At issue is how big network owners such as Shaw, Rogers and Bell sell broadband
access to independent
service providers such as Teksavvy and Distributel.
Accessing all other video
services did count against the limits unless the content
provider paid extra.
• Riverbed Technology agreed to acquire Xirrus, a Thousand Oaks, Calif.
provider of wireless
access network products and
services.
As one of the most vocal Senate proponents for net neutrality, the consumer protection that compels internet
service providers to ensure equal
access to all websites, Franken is already on a collision course with the new administration.
Under Title 17 it says, «Regional Center staff shall have
access to the
provider's grounds, buildings and
service program, and to all related records, including books, computerized data, accounting records and related documentation.».
The order, put out in 2010, prevented Internet
Service Providers (ISPs) from charging content providers more for expanded access to networks, or from charging consumers for faster downloa
Providers (ISPs) from charging content
providers more for expanded access to networks, or from charging consumers for faster downloa
providers more for expanded
access to networks, or from charging consumers for faster download speeds.
Subiaco - based internet
provider iiNet has announced its customers across all brands will have quota - free
access to Netflix, when the online streaming
service hits Australian shores in less than three weeks.
Though ImpactUS doesn't make recommendations, through its new online platform, investors and advisors can connect directly, and invest in Iroquois Valley Farms if they are interested in restorative farmland finance, Shared Interest if they'd like to help entrepreneurs in low - income communities in Africa, Envest Microfinance, for universal
access to financial
services, or CommonBond Communities, an affordable housing
provider in the midwest.
Net neutrality is a concept stipulating that Internet
service providers should enable
access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites.
And while many startups and tech companies that depend on open
access to the Internet have cheered those rules, which reclassify Internet
Service Providers (ISPs) as public utilities under Title II of the Telecommunications Act, cable and telecommunications industry representatives have already filed several lawsuits that challenge the regulations.
CTK is an application
service provider: it hosts the program, and customers get secure
access to it over the Internet.
The pricing on these is vastly different to Dropbox and Box too; instead of subscription models, cloud
service providers charge based on the amount of data you store, the amount of data you distribute (bandwidth) and even how often you want to
access it.
Under the rules, Internet
service providers like Comcast (cmcsa) and Verizon are barred from blocking, slowing
access to or otherwise discriminating against web sites and online
services.
Outgoing U.S. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler warned Republicans against dismantling the Obama administration's landmark «net neutrality» protections that bar internet
service providers from slowing consumer
access to web content.
The rules were adopted to prevent dominant Internet
providers like Comcast (cmcsa), Verizon (vz) and Charter Communications (chtr) from blocking or slowing
access to web sites and
services.
Frank Cianciulli, CEO of Toronto - based business -
services provider Wish Group, once had a client throw a fit because he had dropped his phone in a lake and it no longer could
access the firm's conference - call
services.
This would bar Internet
service providers from creating multiple levels of connection speeds and charging consumers and companies for
access to «fast lanes» — a move critics argue will automatically create «slow lanes,» which will make it very difficult for promising new startups to get up and running.
In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled that the FCC could classify broadband
services as information
services, which meant regulators couldn't establish protections that would prevent
providers from blocking
access or charging additional premiums.
They were intended to ensure a free and open internet, give consumers equal
access to web content and prevent broadband
service providers from favoring their own content.
The rules prohibit internet
service providers from blocking
access to or charging extra to
access certain data or content.
Koebler says that he hopes to dispel the myth that internet users must rely entirely on an internet
service provider to obtain online
access.
The rules, which were upheld by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals earlier in June, ensure that internet
service providers treat data equally and can not give or sell
access to so - called internet fast lanes that would prioritize certain internet
services over others.
Last week U.S. President Barack Obama said Internet
service providers should be regulated more like public utilities to make sure they grant equal
access to all content
providers.
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, a Republican appointed by President Donald Trump, proposed in April to scrap the 2015 landmark net neutrality rules, moving to give broadband
service providers sweeping power over what content consumers can
access.
Important factors that could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those indicated in the forward - looking statements include, among others, the following: our ability to successfully and profitably market our products and
services; the acceptance of our products and services by patients and healthcare providers; our ability to meet demand for our products and services; the willingness of health insurance companies and other payers to cover Cologuard and adequately reimburse us for our performance of the Cologuard test; the amount and nature of competition from other cancer screening and diagnostic products and services; the effects of the adoption, modification or repeal of any healthcare reform law, rule, order, interpretation or policy; the effects of changes in pricing, coverage and reimbursement for our products and services, including without limitation as a result of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014; recommendations, guidelines and quality metrics issued by various organizations such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the American Cancer Society, and the National Committee for Quality Assurance regarding cancer screening or our products and services; our ability to successfully develop new products and services; our success establishing and maintaining collaborative, licensing and supplier arrangements; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals and comply with applicable regulations; and the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors and in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form
services; the acceptance of our products and
services by patients and healthcare providers; our ability to meet demand for our products and services; the willingness of health insurance companies and other payers to cover Cologuard and adequately reimburse us for our performance of the Cologuard test; the amount and nature of competition from other cancer screening and diagnostic products and services; the effects of the adoption, modification or repeal of any healthcare reform law, rule, order, interpretation or policy; the effects of changes in pricing, coverage and reimbursement for our products and services, including without limitation as a result of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014; recommendations, guidelines and quality metrics issued by various organizations such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the American Cancer Society, and the National Committee for Quality Assurance regarding cancer screening or our products and services; our ability to successfully develop new products and services; our success establishing and maintaining collaborative, licensing and supplier arrangements; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals and comply with applicable regulations; and the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors and in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form
services by patients and healthcare
providers; our ability to meet demand for our products and
services; the willingness of health insurance companies and other payers to cover Cologuard and adequately reimburse us for our performance of the Cologuard test; the amount and nature of competition from other cancer screening and diagnostic products and services; the effects of the adoption, modification or repeal of any healthcare reform law, rule, order, interpretation or policy; the effects of changes in pricing, coverage and reimbursement for our products and services, including without limitation as a result of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014; recommendations, guidelines and quality metrics issued by various organizations such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the American Cancer Society, and the National Committee for Quality Assurance regarding cancer screening or our products and services; our ability to successfully develop new products and services; our success establishing and maintaining collaborative, licensing and supplier arrangements; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals and comply with applicable regulations; and the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors and in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form
services; the willingness of health insurance companies and other payers to cover Cologuard and adequately reimburse us for our performance of the Cologuard test; the amount and nature of competition from other cancer screening and diagnostic products and
services; the effects of the adoption, modification or repeal of any healthcare reform law, rule, order, interpretation or policy; the effects of changes in pricing, coverage and reimbursement for our products and services, including without limitation as a result of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014; recommendations, guidelines and quality metrics issued by various organizations such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the American Cancer Society, and the National Committee for Quality Assurance regarding cancer screening or our products and services; our ability to successfully develop new products and services; our success establishing and maintaining collaborative, licensing and supplier arrangements; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals and comply with applicable regulations; and the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors and in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form
services; the effects of the adoption, modification or repeal of any healthcare reform law, rule, order, interpretation or policy; the effects of changes in pricing, coverage and reimbursement for our products and
services, including without limitation as a result of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014; recommendations, guidelines and quality metrics issued by various organizations such as the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the American Cancer Society, and the National Committee for Quality Assurance regarding cancer screening or our products and services; our ability to successfully develop new products and services; our success establishing and maintaining collaborative, licensing and supplier arrangements; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals and comply with applicable regulations; and the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors and in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form
services, including without limitation as a result of the Protecting
Access to Medicare Act of 2014; recommendations, guidelines and quality metrics issued by various organizations such as the U.S. Preventive
Services Task Force, the American Cancer Society, and the National Committee for Quality Assurance regarding cancer screening or our products and services; our ability to successfully develop new products and services; our success establishing and maintaining collaborative, licensing and supplier arrangements; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals and comply with applicable regulations; and the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors and in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form
Services Task Force, the American Cancer Society, and the National Committee for Quality Assurance regarding cancer screening or our products and
services; our ability to successfully develop new products and services; our success establishing and maintaining collaborative, licensing and supplier arrangements; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals and comply with applicable regulations; and the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors and in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form
services; our ability to successfully develop new products and
services; our success establishing and maintaining collaborative, licensing and supplier arrangements; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals and comply with applicable regulations; and the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors and in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form
services; our success establishing and maintaining collaborative, licensing and supplier arrangements; our ability to maintain regulatory approvals and comply with applicable regulations; and the other risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors and in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10 - K and our subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10 - Q.
In recent months, the company's chief executive, Reed Hastings, has said net neutrality was no longer the company's «primary battle,» partly because Netflix is now large enough that it can secure the deals it needs with internet
access providers to ensure its
service is delivered smoothly to customers.
Pai, a Republican named by President Donald Trump to head up the FCC, unveiled plans last week to scrap the 2015 landmark net neutrality rules, moving to give broadband
service providers sweeping power over what content consumers can
access.
WASHINGTON, Nov 21 - The head of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission unveiled plans on Tuesday to repeal landmark 2015 rules that prohibited internet
service providers from impeding consumer
access to web content in a move that promises to recast the digital landscape.
The satellite
provider received
access to broadband, while the wireless giant can now tap new growth areas beyond the realm of cellular
service.
Many saw little point in buying expensive new PCs and signing up with
service providers to
access content that was not only less secure but rarely French.
The Republican - led FCC in December voted 3 - 2 to overturn rules barring
service providers from blocking, slowing
access to or charging...
According to Robert Half Technology, a
provider of IT professional
services, 54 % of U.S. corporations restrict employee
access to social networks due to concerns about productivity, network security, and legal liabilities.
That controversy has been bubbling for years, as many consumers and groups have argued that viewers should be able to pay for
access to a web
service like WatchESPN without having to go through TV
providers.
The majority of the debate revolves around the FCC's proposal to eliminate net neutrality, which would allow Internet
service providers to create multiple levels of connection speeds, charging companies for
access to «fast lanes» — a move critics argue will automatically create «slow lanes.»
Service providers, from Google to Skype to Netflix, pay ISPs for their
access and bandwidth usage just like consumers do.
The FCC rules guaranteeing it were designed to protect internet users» ability to
access the online
services of their choice and to prevent broadband
providers from giving an unfair advantage to their own sites and
services or to those of their paid partners.
He added: «For customers who want
access to existing large - scale public cloud
providers, we have already added greater support for Amazon Web
Services as part of our hybrid delivery with HP Helion Eucalyptus, and we have worked with Microsoft to support Office 365 and Azure.
Everyone has
access to this
service either through their insurance company or with telehealth
providers like American Well, so why waste money and time on an in - person doctor visit when you can improve your health at a lower cost in the comfort of your own home?
«Our shipping - as - a-
service platform allows any business to
access a comprehensive network of shipping
providers through one API and a simple - to - use dashboard to find the best shipping
service for their needs.»
This struggle over whether internet
service providers should enable equal
access to all content and applications regardless of the source, without favoring or blocking particular products or websites, or alternatively be permitted to differentiate the price for some (e.g., high volume) users over others, has been around for some time.
Should you be looking for a safe and secure environment to house your equipment in a jurisdiction that is famous for its data and privacy protection laws, our 100 % sustainable energy data - center in Zurich with multiple upstream
providers, IXP
access and fully redundant power source is at your
service.
Service providers will be able to access higher speeds and improve the quality of their existing service once the balloon project is up and r
Service providers will be able to
access higher speeds and improve the quality of their existing
service once the balloon project is up and r
service once the balloon project is up and running.