«This meaningless and false claim is part of a campaign to spread misinformation by a group whose sole purpose is to end
access to abortion in America,» Ferrero wrote in an email.
With reproductive rights under an unprecedented attack nationally, the Reproductive Health Act (S. 2796) will secure and protect
access to abortion in New York
House Bill Would Deny
Access to Abortion in Virtually All Circumstances and Subject Doctors to Criminal Penalties
Planned Parenthood learned last fall that anti-choice groups had begun circulating a petition to seat a grand jury in an effort to restrict
access to abortion in Kansas.
Bill Would Have Denied DC Women
Access to Abortion in Virtually All Circumstances and Subject Doctors to Criminal Penalties
Against the backdrop of a contentious presidential campaign in which abortion and even contraception were front - burner issues — to a degree unprecedented in recent memory — supporters of reproductive health and rights were able to block high - profile attacks on
access to abortion in states as diverse as Alabama, Idaho, Minnesota, Pennsylvania and Virginia.
It takes a key step to ensure that a woman serving in the Peace Corps has the same rights and
access to abortion in cases when she is the victim of rape or when her life is endangered as are afforded women in the armed services and many other women covered by federal health programs.
The three lawsuits follow the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, which struck down two Texas laws that devastated
access to abortion in the state.
Tim Pawlenty left Minnesota with a legacy of extreme laws that limit women's
access to abortion in our state.
While we may face renewed attempts to restrict
access to abortion in other parts of the country, California has constitutional protections regarding abortion.
The bill includes an important provision that will ensure for the first time that Peace Corps volunteers have
access to abortion in cases of rape, incest, or to protect the life of the woman.
Rep. Louise Slaughter, who has never been one for mincing words, particularly when it comes to women's issues, likened Republican efforts to limit
access to abortion in the budget battle to «an old German Nazi move,» and accused her colleagues across the aisle of wanting to «kill women.»
Overturning a lower court's decision that ruled that the laws unconstitutionally limited
access to abortion in the state, New Orleans - based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals judges wrote, «on its face does not impose an undue burden on the life and health of a woman.»
In Lader's mind there was a very definite connection between the struggle to abolish slavery in the 19th century and the struggle to abolish legal restrictions on
access to abortion in the 20th.
It is just this illusion of sex without consequences, she maintains, that brought us to the point of needing widespread
access to abortion in the first place.
Women have
access to abortion in the third trimester only in extreme circu.mstances.
Not exact matches
«Brazil and other countries
in Latin America are really good examples of what it looks like when you set up barriers
to access for
abortions,» said Mónica Arango, Regional Director for Latin America and the Caribbean at the Center for Reproductive Rights.
The combination of restricted
access to abortion and increased Internet
access has led
to the rise of Do - It - Yourself
abortions in the U.S., many of which look remarkably like the illegal
abortions taking place
in Brazil.
Although the charges were ultimately dismissed, pro-choice activists believe that there will be more cases like it as
access to abortion becomes more limited
in the U.S.
Still, potential parallels may be emerging as states
in the U.S. move
to restrict
access to abortion.
She also discussed some of the women's health and family policies that she would prioritize
in the White House, such as paid family leave and
access to birth control and safe
abortion.
All this changed when the sexual revolution and the rise of feminism ushered
in easy divorce, the expectation of a career outside the home for married women, ready
access to contraception and
abortion, and the gay - rights movement.
Well, if you look at the statistical analysis, you will find that as
abortion became legal and safe, the rate of violent crime has dropped
in this country — significantly and with a high correlation
to access to safe and legal
abortions.
The religious among us keep trying
to chip away at the separation of church and state by making people recite the pledge of allegiance with the God clause, installing religious symbols and displays on public property, holding prayer breakfasts for politicians, berating the removal of prayer
in public schools, trying
to pass laws limiting women's
access to birth control, and trying
to get an amendment passed outlawing
abortion (since
in their view God creates a soul the moment a sperm enters an egg).
And when a woman becomes pregnant within a loving, supportive, respectful relationship, has every option open
to her, [and] decides she does not wish
to bear a child; and has
access to a safe, affordable
abortion — there is not a tragedy
in sight — only blessing.
Almost all of the coverage of the Lancet findings suggests that this decline
in abortions correlates
to increased
access to contraceptives — for obvious reasons.
In Sweden, for example, an increase in affordable access to contraception and the presence of free contraceptive counseling have paralleled a substantial increase in the teen abortion rat
In Sweden, for example, an increase
in affordable access to contraception and the presence of free contraceptive counseling have paralleled a substantial increase in the teen abortion rat
in affordable
access to contraception and the presence of free contraceptive counseling have paralleled a substantial increase
in the teen abortion rat
in the teen
abortion rate.
In the long and arduous fight leading up
to Roe v. Wade, the one thing feminists were most passionate about was their belief that unrestricted
access to abortion was indispensable
to achieving gender equality.
Most of the countries where
abortion is illegal also suffer from widespread poverty and limited
access to contraception — huge drivers
in the
abortion rate.
Obviously, so the argument goes, if we want
to cut teenage pregnancies and
abortions we must have
access to sexual health services —
in other words, teenagers are less likely
to get pregnant if they are using contraception; failing contraception, then we should give them
access to the morning - after pill, which may be seen as preferable
to a twelve - year - old getting pregnant.
The best way of testing this (putting aside ethical concerns for a moment) would be
to conduct an experiment
in which one group did not have
access to confidential
abortion and another did, and then we could monitor the differences between them.
Not only would improved
access to contraception impact the
abortion rate
in the U.S., it would dramatically reduce maternal and infant deaths around the world.
When
abortion is made easier
to access, e.g. by assuring youngsters that their parents need never know, we would predict more youngsters
to engage
in risky sexual activity.
Even Anna Glazier, a health expert and a strong proponent of greater
access to the morning - after pill, stated
in early 2006
in an editorial
in the British Medical Journal that greater
access to emergency birth control has failed
to cut pregnancy and
abortion rates.
And why on earth oppose
access to birth control and reforms
in the health care system when those will likely make the biggest difference
in actually curbing
abortions in this country?
The response of the last government was essentially more of the same: earlier and more detailed sex education, family planning clinics
in schools, promotion of emergency birth control (otherwise known as the «morning after pill») easier
access to abortion, all without the need for parental consent even
in the case of underage girls.
In her eyes, by running ahead of the people, the now - infamous 1973 decision gave «opponents of
access to abortion a target
to aim at relentlessly.»
The Connexions service, school nurse service and Healthy Schools standards are just a few of the many routes whereby inappropriate sex education or
access to abortion and contraception may sneak
in under the radar of unwary teachers and governors.
However, if we could increase
access to contraceptives
to meet this need, it is estimated that it would result
in 50 million fewer
abortions per year worldwide.
Those who are on the front lines of championing contraceptive
access to reduce
abortion in the developing world are having national impact among conservatives!
How dare these women insist that their
abortions are appropriate and moral, while simultaneously attempting
to destroy
abortion access for every other woman
in the country?
The writers of the report are, perhaps, most disturbed by the fact that «even when legal,
abortion is often prevented or delayed by obstacles
to the
access of appropriate services, such as the widespread use of conscientious objection, medically unnecessary waiting periods or biased counselling»; and calls on Member States
to «regulate and monitor the use of conscientious objection
in the key professions, so as
to ensure that reproductive healthcare is guaranteed as an individual's right.»
Regarding
abortion — we know that laws
in some states have been affected emanating from religious sources that have limited
access to facilities.
Perhaps most troubling was her recent statement at a Women
in the World Conference where she suggested that
in order
to expand worldwide
access to abortion, «deep - seated cultural codes, religious beliefs, and structural biases have
to be changed.»
Endorsing a man who publicly and privately promotes sexual promiscuity
in hopes of reducing
abortion is no less absurd than endorsing the candidate who promises increased
access to abortion.
There is a fairly constant onslaught on the fundamental right
to life — from Ireland with its proposed referendum on permitting
abortion,
to campaigns for increased
access to abortion and euthanasia
in many parts of the world.
Thus, the stage is already set for the creation of a positive right
to die here that could, one dark day, subsume the religious liberty of doctors not
to participate — as is occurring now
in Canada, and afflicts pro-life doctors
in Victoria, Australia regarding
access to abortion.
The Supreme Court has found that
access to an
abortion must be guaranteed so it is unclear if eliminating every
abortion clinic
in a single state is permitted.
Look, stupid, you can pay
to prevent pregnancy, or you can stop attempting
to prevent women from
accessing legal
abortion, or you can pay for kids that weren't wanted
in the first place.
«As governor of Texas, Rick Perry has pursued a single - minded agenda: Take away women's health care, destroy Planned Parenthood, and block women's
access to safe
abortion care,» the Planned Parenthood Action fund wrote
in a recent petition drive.