Sentences with phrase «access to government papers»

It also states that ministers should relinquish all government material when ceasing to hold a role, and provides rules on access to government papers by former ministers (for example, those writing memoirs may wish to check the documents from their time in office).

Michael Fabricant, the Conservative MP, says Cameron's decision to stop pro-Brexit ministers having access to some government papers is «a huge blunder».

Not exact matches

Sir Gerald, a Christian, said the UK government may not have be privy to all the necessary information because the coalition wasn't in power at the time: «Much of this occurred at the time when we were not in government and we don't have access to the papers of the previous administration, so there are practical considerations here.»

«Getting on the housing ladder» may sound like an innocuous phrase, but it in fact refers to accessing the most desirable financial asset, capable of increasing our paper wealth many times more than moving job or investing in the stock market or government bonds.

A genuine and sustained debate among MPs about the details of the policy regime, much of it centred around the proposals in a paper from moderate backbench critics Alan Whitehead and Peter Bradley, has led to significant government concessions and a new focus on questions of increasing access to university from a broader social intake.

Following up on recommendations to make more research freely available to scientists and the public, the U.K. government today pledged # 10 million toward making scientific papers open access.

Responding to concerns from advocates for public access to government - funded research, the House of Representatives science committee has agreed to shorten the deadline within a draft bill requiring federal agencies to provide free access to scientific papers that they supported.

Affleck is strong on atmosphere, convincingly recreating the sense of fear that gripped the US embassy as angry crowds stormed the gates; government workers frantically attempt to destroy important papers before gun - toting Iranians gain access to the building.

«It's encouraging that the government's green paper proposals have recognised this, but to really transform children's mental health provision, we need all schools to have access to dedicated funding, support and training to be able to source, commission and evaluate services effectively.»

Thomas Nechyba argues in one paper that in the United States there is no such thing as a true public school, since access to public schools is rationed through private housing markets, and it is unlikely that there will ever by a fully private school, since private schools are subject to government oversight, and support for private schools is conditional on certain public aims being met.

I really welcome the points in the Government's Green Paper on widening access so that more children have a chance to attend excellent grammar schools.

In the green paper itself, the government acknowledges the need to «increase the pace at which selective schools are ensuring fair access».

The barriers to access to justice in the arena of family law have been well - researched and frequently commented upon, both on these pages and in a myriad of academic papers and government commissioned reports.

Another recent example relates to disappearing Ontario government press releases and backgrounder papers, rightly identified by the then President of the Toronto Association of Law Libraries in December 2003 as alarming due to its negative impact on legal research and the public's right to access government information.

The paper explains that a worker registration scheme could be used as part of a managed approach to migration, giving the Government access to data on the parts of the economy that draw in EU workers.

In Canada, recognizing the need for new ways to inspire public access to the law, the Government commissioned a White Paper in 2000 proposing a new format for legislation.

-- more frequent communication with my immediate family — more connectedness with colleagues across the country (and in some cases, around the world)-- becoming acquainted with colleagues from around the world — finding people who have similar experiences for the purpose of mutual moral support — sharing photos with a lot more people (before digital cameras I did not take photographs since it was too expensive)-- distance learning via the web (courses)-- learning about subjects of interest in more depth, especially from papers by others — learning from conferences I was unable to attend in person (through papers posted, blog posts, conference wikis, and photos on Flickr)-- more readily available consumer information — more readily available government information — learning more about basic health issues — more creative cooking since I have more access to recipes — feeling more connected to my favourite musical groups / musicians since they now have extensive websites, email notification services, and blogs — better organization of the various groups I belong to

In a research paper published in March in the journal Digital Investigation, Zdziarski writes: «It may even be possible for a government agency with privileged access to a cellular carrier's network to connect to the device over cellular (although I can not verify this, due to the carrier's firewalls).»

The 2000 budget paper on Indigenous policy notes the «record amount of $ 2.3 billion... allocated to targeted Indigenous - specific programmes» and that «as part of its commitment to practical reconciliation between indigenous and non-indigenous Australians, the Commonwealth government is determined to ensure improved access for indigenous Australians to key government programmes and services».

While each budget paper on Indigenous policy notes the «record amount» that is allocated to Indigenous - specific programs and generally highlights the commitment of the Government to ensuring improved access to programs and services, at no stage do they specifically identify the reduction of the disparities in enjoyment of rights between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people as the purpose of the expenditure.