Sentences with phrase «access to justice problem in»

There is a serious access to justice problem in Canada.

Enlarging the scope of paralegal practice would clearly help address the access to justice problem in this province — this is in the public interest.

All of these designs addressed some of the many causes of the access to justice problem in an effort to create discernable change.

Ross's thoughts about the access to justice problem in this country, and why he believes it's important for attorneys to find creative ways to work with clients within their budget

How can we decry the access to justice problem in Canada without simultaneously acknowledging that there is a lot of truth in this statement?

I was recently appointed to chair the Innovation Committee of the Oregon Bar, and our charge is to recommend ways to address the Access to Justice problem in our state (and, by extension, our country).

There is broad recognition of a serious access to justice problem in Canada [10].

(Please indulge me in a very brief discussion of this issue, it illustrates the point I'm trying to make nicely and I'll get to the access to justice problem in a moment.)

We already know that this is untrue — otherwise we wouldn't have an access to justice problem in this country.

Ben Burton: Yeah, so the first half of the book is a description of the access to justice problem in both the civil courts and the criminal courts explaining how we've gotten there, explaining the solutions that we've tried and why they failed.

Regina lawyer Alex Shalashniy said during the CBA Legal Futures Initiative's Twitter chat Tuesday night that he's heard lawyers admitting they would be unable to pay their own fees if they needed a lawyer — something he calls a «telling illustration» of the access to justice problem in Canada.

Ending the lawyer monopoly on legal services will not, by itself, solve the access to justice problem in its entirety, but it is an important and necessary element.

The Centre can not singlehandedly make a significant improvement in the access to justice problem in the UK — we can not plug the hole.

In addition to that, our new Minister of Justice and Attorney General is very keen on addressing our access to justice problems in Manitoba.

Not exact matches

Demand that school leaders invest in really supporting students by providing social and emotional support, like access to school psychologists and restorative justice counselors, and spaces where students can work through problems instead of calling law enforcement to deal with discipline issues.

Yet energy justice — defined here as meeting one's needs for the services that energy provides at reasonable cost, with fair and equitable access, and without disproportionate economic and environmental burdens — can mitigate the problems and pressures in other areas, especially when efficiency and solar energy are developed so as to create local jobs.

The lack of focus on access to justice and diversity in leadership can create problems and biases in a product's outcome.

The necessary solution is set out in my Slaw blog dated August 9th; «Government Intervention to Solve the «Access to Justice» Problem is Inevitable.»

All that has been written and said in relation to the «access to justice» problem — that is, the fact that the majority of the population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost — fails to contain the necessary solution.

The proof of the importance of that difference lies in the fact that all of the reports written, and all of the conferences held about this «access to justice» problem and about LAO, all failed to examine LAO LAW.

The most comprehensive and viable options I still think are outlined in the recent «Middle Income Access to Justice» book, which takes tackles the problem of middle class political apathy for access to justice initiatives heAccess to Justice» book, which takes tackles the problem of middle class political apathy for access to justice initiatives hJustice» book, which takes tackles the problem of middle class political apathy for access to justice initiatives heaccess to justice initiatives hjustice initiatives head on.

I think a key problem at the root of the articling crisis and ongoing access to justice concerns is that law school, as wonderful as it is (I loved it), simply does not adequately train students with skills that can be applied in a constructive way to benefit clients.

U of T's access to middle - income justice initiative, a multi-pronged initiative aimed at addressing the growing problem of middle - income access to the civil justice system in Canada.

What we call the «access to justice» problem seems to be similar in nature.

The Chief Justice's speech in Calgary, which I mentioned here last week, illustrated that despite all of our efforts to address access to justice the problem is getting worse, not Justice's speech in Calgary, which I mentioned here last week, illustrated that despite all of our efforts to address access to justice the problem is getting worse, not justice the problem is getting worse, not better:

A recent report by the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, chaired by Supreme Court of Canada Justice Thomas A. Cromwell, stated nearly 12 million Canadians will experience at least one legal problem in a three - year period, and few will have the resources to solve them.

While the problem of access to justice has more than one cause (and so must be addressed in more than one way), the cost of lawyers seems increasingly to be part of the problem.

The fact that the majority of Canadians can not afford to seek justice through the current system is a problem which far outstrips in magnitude concerns about maximizing procedural and due process protections for those litigants who are presently able to access the system.

Two major reports on access to justice were published in 2013 and, as indicated by the B.C. task forces, the CBA Futures Report and the debate over ABS, legal regulators and the legal profession are taking the access to justice problem seriously.

For further details see (pdf downloads): (1) «Access to Justice — Unaffordable Legal Services» Concepts and Solutions»; (2) «The Technology of Centralized Legal Research Can Solve the Unaffordable Legal Services Problem»; (3) «Access to Justice — Canada's Unaffordable Legal Services — CanLII as the Necessary Support Service»; (4) «A2J: Preventing the Abolition of Law Societies by Curing the Defects in their Management Structure: A Solution to the Unaffordable Legal Services Problem»; (5) «A2J: «Let Them Eat Cake,» So Let Them Use Alternative Legal Services»; (6) Indexing; (7) Sometimes Laws are Too Important to be Left to Lawyers — Lawyers Without Technical Support,» (Slaw January 28, 2016), and other access to justice (A2J) articles on my SSRN author's page, and Slaw author'sAccess to Justice — Unaffordable Legal Services» Concepts and Solutions»; (2) «The Technology of Centralized Legal Research Can Solve the Unaffordable Legal Services Problem»; (3) «Access to Justice — Canada's Unaffordable Legal Services — CanLII as the Necessary Support Service»; (4) «A2J: Preventing the Abolition of Law Societies by Curing the Defects in their Management Structure: A Solution to the Unaffordable Legal Services Problem»; (5) «A2J: «Let Them Eat Cake,» So Let Them Use Alternative Legal Services»; (6) Indexing; (7) Sometimes Laws are Too Important to be Left to Lawyers — Lawyers Without Technical Support,» (Slaw January 28, 2016), and other access to justice (A2J) articles on my SSRN author's page, and Slaw author'Justice — Unaffordable Legal Services» Concepts and Solutions»; (2) «The Technology of Centralized Legal Research Can Solve the Unaffordable Legal Services Problem»; (3) «Access to Justice — Canada's Unaffordable Legal Services — CanLII as the Necessary Support Service»; (4) «A2J: Preventing the Abolition of Law Societies by Curing the Defects in their Management Structure: A Solution to the Unaffordable Legal Services Problem»; (5) «A2J: «Let Them Eat Cake,» So Let Them Use Alternative Legal Services»; (6) Indexing; (7) Sometimes Laws are Too Important to be Left to Lawyers — Lawyers Without Technical Support,» (Slaw January 28, 2016), and other access to justice (A2J) articles on my SSRN author's page, and Slaw author'sAccess to Justice — Canada's Unaffordable Legal Services — CanLII as the Necessary Support Service»; (4) «A2J: Preventing the Abolition of Law Societies by Curing the Defects in their Management Structure: A Solution to the Unaffordable Legal Services Problem»; (5) «A2J: «Let Them Eat Cake,» So Let Them Use Alternative Legal Services»; (6) Indexing; (7) Sometimes Laws are Too Important to be Left to Lawyers — Lawyers Without Technical Support,» (Slaw January 28, 2016), and other access to justice (A2J) articles on my SSRN author's page, and Slaw author'Justice — Canada's Unaffordable Legal Services — CanLII as the Necessary Support Service»; (4) «A2J: Preventing the Abolition of Law Societies by Curing the Defects in their Management Structure: A Solution to the Unaffordable Legal Services Problem»; (5) «A2J: «Let Them Eat Cake,» So Let Them Use Alternative Legal Services»; (6) Indexing; (7) Sometimes Laws are Too Important to be Left to Lawyers — Lawyers Without Technical Support,» (Slaw January 28, 2016), and other access to justice (A2J) articles on my SSRN author's page, and Slaw author'saccess to justice (A2J) articles on my SSRN author's page, and Slaw author'justice (A2J) articles on my SSRN author's page, and Slaw author's page.

This paragraph in particular of Malcolm Mercer's article obscures the law society's great negligence in failing to try to solve the problem, «If we are serious about the access to justice gap, we should accept that no one solution will slay the access dragon.

That has not yet occurred in law around any facet of the access to justice problem, as far as I can tell.

The most pressing problem when it comes to access to justice is the vast majority of people don't know what to do in case of personal legal issues.

As Chief Justice McLachlin writes in the foreword to the Cromwell Report, «the problem of access to justice is not a nJustice McLachlin writes in the foreword to the Cromwell Report, «the problem of access to justice is not a njustice is not a new one.

The problems of civil justice, of access to civil justice and of unmet need for service in civil justice are most commonly studied from the point of view of the justice system, mainly with regard to the courts.

All of this also points to the importance of looking outside the legal profession for help in trying to address access to justice problems.

It is clear that in Scotland at present there are significant problems in providing Access to Justice for personal injury claimants.

Last but certainly not least, with more than 1 in 4 respondents (26 %) having experienced a stress - related illness and more than 1 in 5 respondents (21 %) reporting the loss of employment or need to relocate as a result of their legal problem, Global Insights on Access to Justice reinforces the role of justice issues on people'sJustice reinforces the role of justice issues on people'sjustice issues on people's lives.

We support Georgetown University Law Center and other law schools in teaching their students to collaborate with access to justice organizations to build interactive, online expert systems that guide people through complex legal problems.

The answer is that this Government has no interest at all in maintaining access to justice because, as the defendant, it sees this as the problem itself.

Access to justice is not generally a problem in personal injury cases, because of the prevalence of contingency fees.

The first stage of the process will... see the Online Solutions Court expand our ability to secure access to justice in two ways... it will help individuals identify the nature of their problem.

Therefore, because of the access to justice problem of unaffordable legal services, shouldn't there be an expanded constitutional «right to counsel» in criminal cases?

Second, a central theme in the current access to justice debate has been the idea that there should be a culture shift in Canada's justice system away from being organized around the provision of legal services towards a client - centred and problem - oriented model.

Access to justice is an incredibly difficult problem not only for those who are indigent or without resources but increasingly for those in the middle class who can't afford legal services in order to meet their basic needs or find them difficult to aAccess to justice is an incredibly difficult problem not only for those who are indigent or without resources but increasingly for those in the middle class who can't afford legal services in order to meet their basic needs or find them difficult to accessaccess.

We need new approaches in the quiver of access of justice services to address the vast majority of legal problems experienced by the public that are, from the point of view of the people experiencing them, serious and difficult to resolve and that have negative consequences if they are not dealt with.

Based on the above, the OPC view is that since search engines already engage in the indexing activity and are covered under PIPEDA, they should have the obligation to de-index and takedown «because the problems that need addressing arise from their own actions; and because it promotes access to justice.»

In other words, whether you view this as a policy problem or not, it is definitely an access to justice problem.

That is important and good but access to justice in terms of obtaining help dealing with legal problems is much broader in scope.

Sreerupa is interested in using technology for promoting access to justice, and in developing solutions to age old problems.