Sentences with phrase «access to the same information about»

As well, this practice also worsens market efficiency and liquidity — in other words, stock prices would not accurately reflect relevant, available information and assets could not be quickly bought or sold — and discourages the production of fundamental information, compared to a scenario where all traders have access to the same information about prices.

That's one of the reasons I created Organic Baby Resource, to help other parents have access to the same information about organic baby care without spending lots of time hunting for it.

And as Aiden Pierce, you can have access to that same information about anyone you lay eyes on.

Not exact matches

The writers accurate use of common names of the time shows they had access to reliable information about the people and places involved in the history of Jesus and that their writings took place at about the same time as the events (there would have been no way to access information regarding names of that time hundreds of years after the period, remember, no books, no libraries, etc..)

Review: Although the site features a lot of self - promotion (large «house ads» dominate the top of the home page) and multiple links to the same content, this does allow the user to access information from multiple locations and learn about professional development opportunities.

Regarding preliminary test data, it was not available to the public until 8/14/09, so unless you had special access to it, I imagine your information about Shaw's scores staying about the same came from DCPS.

Analysts have access to about the same information as everyone else has.

A credit repair business and its salespersons, agents, and representatives, and independent contractors who sell or attempt to sell the services of a credit repair business, shall not do any of the following: (1) Charge or receive any money or other valuable consideration prior to full and complete performance of the services that the credit repair business has agreed to perform for or on behalf of the consumer; (2) Charge or receive any money or other valuable consideration solely for referral of the consumer to a retail seller or to any other credit grantor who will or may extend credit to the consumer, if the credit that is or will be extended to the consumer is upon substantially the same terms as those available to the general public; (3) Represent that it can directly or indirectly arrange for the removal of derogatory credit information from the consumer's credit report or otherwise improve the consumer's credit report or credit standing, provided, this shall not prevent truthful, unexaggerated statements about the consumer's rights under existing law regarding his credit history or regarding access to his credit file; (4) Make, or counsel or advise any consumer to make, any statement that is untrue or misleading and which is known or which by the exercise of reasonable care should be known, to be untrue or misleading, to a consumer reporting agency or to any person who has extended credit to a consumer or to whom a consumer is applying for an extension of credit, with respect to a consumer's creditworthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity; or (5) Make or use any untrue or misleading representations in the offer or sale of the services of a credit repair business or engage, directly or indirectly, in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deception upon any person in connection with the offer or sale of the services of a credit repair business.

While just about every discount brokerage allows you to make trades via a smartphone, investors won't bother if they have to zoom in on a screen or can't access the same level of information they can from their PC.

When CRU did the same thing denying access to information, I said as much about them.

All About Information FC confirms ATIA institutions can make only one access decision On July 11th, the Federal Court held that an Access to Information Act institution's access decision was null and void because it had made a prior access decision in response to the same reaccess decision On July 11th, the Federal Court held that an Access to Information Act institution's access decision was null and void because it had made a prior access decision in response to the same reAccess to Information Act institution's access decision was null and void because it had made a prior access decision in response to the same reaccess decision was null and void because it had made a prior access decision in response to the same reaccess decision in response to the same request.

The social network already allowed users to access further information about publishers, but not with the same detail, demonstrating a step forward.

Many of them are pages you can already access from the user interface — for example, the about: about page shows the same version information as the About window and about: addons just takes you to the add - on management about: about page shows the same version information as the About window and about: addons just takes you to the add - on management about page shows the same version information as the About window and about: addons just takes you to the add - on management About window and about: addons just takes you to the add - on management about: addons just takes you to the add - on management page.

Not one mention in the article about privacy laws; the access to the cloud files by those who are not given any right to such access; the ownership of the documents once they are on some thrid party's server; their location (as you mentioned) and countries rules — think USA and their permisive laws for collecting information on anyone; their ability to sell information from same; the systems / co's reliability and what happens should they go out of business.

How about having that same person then added to your CRM, or given access to buyer and seller information, all customized from you?

In following this discussion about publishing sold prices I keep coming back to the same question: «what exactly is wrong with offering homeowners, buyers, investors, renters etc. easy online access to property information such as is the case with the viewpoint site?»