Using state resources to offset disparities in property tax bases may meet a legal definition of equal
access under state constitutions, but the LaFortune et al. findings raise questions about this strategy for promoting more equal outcomes.
Not exact matches
While the U.S. Supreme Court has held that education is not a «fundamental interest»
under the federal
constitution, most
state constitutions promise children
access to an adequate education.
State governments are the entities ultimately responsible, under state constitutions, for ensuring kids have access to great sch
State governments are the entities ultimately responsible,
under state constitutions, for ensuring kids have access to great sch
state constitutions, for ensuring kids have
access to great schools.
The same footnote that contains those citations also offers OCR's most questionable legal argument: «Numerous
State courts have also deemed inequitable
access to these educational resources unlawful
under their
State constitutions.»
While, for instance, responsibilities for education and health are shared between the Commonwealth,
States and Territories, responsibility for record - keeping and
access resides separately with each jurisdiction; that for juvenile justice and welfare lies with the
States and Territories, and the Commonwealth has «special» responsibility for Indigenous people
under s 51 (26) of the
Constitution (the races power), as well as for Australia's international human rights obligations by way of its Executive power to ratify treaties and its power to «incorporate» them into domestic law
under s 51 (29) of the
Constitution.
Access to Florida
state courts is a right enjoyed by all persons
under Article V, section 21 of the Florida
Constitution, regardless of legal representation.