Sentences with phrase «accommodate the employee without»

Not exact matches

In March 2001, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit sided with the employer, ruling that the employee's religious beliefs could not be accommodated without causing undue hardship to the company.

The memo cites Executive Law § 296 (10)(a), which mandates that employees religious observances or practices be accomnodated «unless, after engaging in a bona fide effort, the employer demonstrates that it is unable to reasonably accommodate the employee's or prospective employee's sincerely held religious observance or practice... without undue hardship.»

Failure to accommodate an employee's family status can result in awards of damages, without the necessity of proving any actual monetary loss.

If we forget the fact that MayorFord is an elected official (who apparently can't be removed without an act of Parliament), he would, if a regular employee, have a right to be accommodated under provincial human rights legislation if he was addicted to illegal (or legal) substances and that addiction was the cause of his behaviour.

(b) concludes that the employee's needs can not be accommodated without undue hardship on the board.

includes all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well as belief, unless an employer demonstrates that he is unable to reasonably accommodate to an employee's or prospective employee's religious observance or practice without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer's business

«An employer must examine options to accommodate an employee's disability up to the point of undue hardship... If the employer terminates the employee without exploring and assessing the accommodation options, then the employee may have the basis for a human rights complaint.»

Can the employer reasonably accommodate the employee in some position (existing or created) without undue delay?

``... there may be another situation where the application of the Afghanistan Guidelines could result in a particular employee being denied a posting in Afghanistan even though the needs of such person could be accommodated without imposing an undue hardship on the employer.

«There is simply one question for the purposes of the third step of the test: has the employer «demonstrated that it is impossible to accommodate individual employees sharing the characteristics of the claimant without imposing undue hardship upon the employer»?