Sentences with phrase «account for the observations»

Therefore, these explanations do not appear to account for the observations reported here.

But when Danish physicist Niels Bohr showed that the electrons in atoms, too, must behave as quanta to account for observations, Einstein made a conceptual leap that troubled him even more.

The new findings suggest that the second scenario is required to account for the observations, and that there is an approximately equal contribution from both sources of the buoyancy driving the plates, at least in the Pacific basin.

Throughout recorded history, several cosmologies and cosmogonies have been proposed to account for observations of the Universe.

To eliminate the possibility of any undifferentiated cells in the cultures accounting for this observation, DMSO - differentiated cells were treated with the anti-proliferative agent cytosine arabinosidase (Ara - C), starting two days after aggregate plating.

This accounts for the observation that galaxies appear to be flying apart; the space between them is stretching.

It seems self - evident that future scientists need to learn both observations (what children usually do) and theories to account for the observations.

Scientists have developed theories to account for these observations.

If 20 % of the student body experiences emotional difficulty on a regular basis, and another 15 or so live in disruptive environments, is accounts for my observation that about 35 % of our students come to school without the ability to learn in our traditional environment.

No natural cause nor increased solar can account for these observations.

Many forcings were being twiddled to account for observations (namely aerosols), but the main CO2 forcing seemed to be the third rail.

that climate models can not account for the observations we already have let alone make adequate predictions about what will happen in the future.that century - scale variations in tropical Pacific climate modes can significantly modulate radiatively forced shifts in global temperature.»

I suspect that it looked OK in your view or you didn't check; «the paper i cited talks of the hiatus in global temperatures for the past 20 years or so, that the Little Ice Age was global in extent, and that climate models can not account for the observations we already have let alone make adequate predictions about what will happen in the future.

There are many who will not like this recent paper published in Nature Communications on principle as it talks of the hiatus in global temperatures for the past 20 years or so, that the Little Ice Age was global in extent, and that climate models can not account for the observations we already have let alone make adequate predictions about what will happen in the future.

Indeed, elementary budgetary explanations that invoke fossil fuel burning (and deforestation) readily account for these observations.

I point to the absence of any * empirical evidence * for any other energetically sufficient forcing that could account for the observations.

CFCs and CO2 are therefore not required to account for observations or are far less important than previously proposed.

The forcing from changes in total solar irradiance alone does not seem to account for these observations, implying the existence of an (unknown) amplifying mechanism.

Consider this key sentence: «The (climate) forcing from changes in total solar irradiance alone does not seem to account for these observations, implying the existence of an amplifying mechanism such as the hypothesized GCR - cloud link.»

My secondary interest is in ascertaing a conceptual overview of all the disparate processes that can account for the observations that indicate the current trend.

st Order Draft, the Second Order Draft, p7, cites several papers re empirical relationships between GCR and aspects of the climate system and notes: «The forcing from changes in total solar irradiance alone does not seem to account for these observations, implying the existence of an amplifying mechanism such as the hypothesiz GCR - cloud link.»

The forcing from changes in total solar irradiance alone does not seem to account for these observations, implying the existence of this unknown amplifying mechanism.The cosmic ray - ionization mechanism is too weak to influence global concentrations of CCN or their change over the last century or during a solar cycle in any climatically significant way.

Your model needs to account for the observations.

The forcingfrom changes in total solar irradiance alone does not seem to account for these observations, implying the existence of an (unknown) amplifying mechanism.

If however you could make a positive suggestion as to alternative mechanism to account for observations then that would be welcome but I hold out no hope of that because you don't even accept that the observations do differ from what we would expect from internal system variability on it's own.

This alone accounts for your observation.

With Bayes, we can ask which explanation most accurately or very nearly truly accounts for observations, given uncertainty, with prior based on simplicity of assumptions, parsimony of exceptions and universality of application.

«The scientific method demands that even if there is only one observation not fully explained by a hypothesis the hypothesis must be dropped or modified to fully account for all observations.»

It just all indicates an effect two or more orders of magnitude too small to account for observations or to be considerd significant compared to CO2 sensitivity.

For a challenge to the current view of water vapour feedback to succeed, relevant processes would have to be incorporated into a GCM, and it would have to be shown that the resulting GCM accounted for observations at least as well as the current generation.

Not exact matches

A more interesting observation is that the Nordic countries — Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Iceland and Finland — accounted for 11 of the top 50, showing appetite and growth for entrepreneurs.

As part of the reconciliation process, DM may amend the data so that mismatched observations are correctly accounted for in the system.

The appeal of invoking the «fall» to account for any and all manner of perceived ills is that, like any other magical explanation, it can allegedly explain any and every possible observation; however, such undiscriminating, untestable, and unfalsifiable explanations effectively explain nothing.

Thus Polanyi concludes that, «When Einstein discovered rationality in nature, unaided by any observation that had not been available for at least fifty years before, our positivistic textbooks promptly covered up the scandal by an appropriately embellished account of his discovery.»

Such explanations, which can account for any and all observations, effectively explain nothing.

A theory is valued if it accurately accounts for known observations and yields precise predictions of future measurements.

A theory in its technical usage is something that is more or less verified or an established explanation accounting for known facts or observations, like the theory of relativity or how evolutionary biology is a theory.

Second, the induction to the new set of laws is not a generalization from particulars; the role of prior theory in guiding observation (of data or selection of uniformities) is accounted for.

Two recurring items that were discussed on the Cats side of the ball were that Duke had run roughshod over the defense and that Jackson has had no success agaist Power 5 teams; none of the observations on the two topics took into account the defensive back injuries that depleted the defense for Duke or the fact that Jackson has been banged up.

This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that 1 or more nutrients in fish transfer to breast milk and account for some of the observed beneficial effect and is relevant to optimizing the maternal diet during lactation.

However, as with other observational studies, these results may have been affected by confounding variables that were unknown and thus not accounted for, and the observation of an association gives no proof of causality.

Previous calculations have indicated any effect would be too small to account for dark energy, and would produce an acceleration that changes in time in a way that disagrees with observations.

These Chandra observations showed that expanding debris from a supernova can accelerate subatomic particles faster than previously thought, and in fact can account for the highest - energy protons that come from outer space and are seen hitting the Earth's upper atmosphere.

They tested high - performance computational models against known geological and geophysical observations of the Central Anatolian Plateau, and demonstrated that a drip of lithospheric material below the surface can account for the measured elevation changes across the region.

But a team led by Marco Ajello of the Kavli Institute in Stanford, California, studied observations by NASA's Fermi telescope and found this accounts for no more than 30 per cent of the glow.

Explaining Brain Facts The theory can account for a number of puzzling observations.

Observations suggest that the Oort cloud contains as many as 400 billion objects, 100 times as many as theoretical models can account for.

Because its effects on the larger star were seen after just 10 weeks of observations, the team says there are probably many more like it in the cluster, perhaps even enough to account for all the dark matter needed to hold the cluster together.

Additionally, the new theory should account for the astrophysical observations of dark matter and dark energy.

Le Verrier suggested the existence of a hitherto unobserved object whose gravitational pull was perturbing Uranus's orbit in precisely the way required to account for the anomalous observations.