The IPCC report did not take into
account thawing permafrost and the subsequent release of methane.
Not exact matches
«A new wildlife paradigm is emerging in North America's boreal forests... Edward Struzik's deft
account interweaves reportage, science and policy to show how fires that are normally key to ecological resilience are growing bigger and faster,
thawing permafrost, degrading watersheds and disrupting habitats of species from grizzly bears to fungi.»
Permafrost thaw is not a new problem; urban planners, architects, and builders have taken its volatility into
account for decades in the Arctic.
A new study by Prof Jason Lowe and Dr Dan Bernie at the UK's Met Office Hadley Centre takes these CMIP5 models and tries to
account for additional uncertainties in the carbon budget associated with feedbacks, such as carbon released by
thawing of
permafrost or methane production from wetlands, as a result of climate change.
This is a tall order on its own, and it does not take into
account additional emissions from
permafrost thawing.
«
Permafrost hundreds of metres thick simply doesn't warm or
thaw much in ten years on
account of its thermal inertia.»
The IPCC report also said that a possible release of ghg
thawing permafrost and methane hydrates — which are «not
accounted for in current models» — would shrink the remaining budget even further.