Not exact matches
One interpretation of the emphasis on developing the common core curriculum is that these debates provide a convenient diversion from potentially more intractable fights over bigger reform ideas
like using improved
teacher evaluations for personnel decisions, expanded school choice, or enhanced
accountability systems.
If states continue to implement the standards in ways that undermine systems working to improve education in their state (
like teacher evaluation, school
accountability, school choice, etc.) more and more states will feel the pressure to abandon the standards.
«School reform» has taken on a very particular meaning in the past decade: reformers are those who support things
like charter schooling,
accountability, test - based
teacher evaluation, and the Common Core.
• Race to the Top's enthusiasm for rigorous
teacher evaluations led states to adopt «growth measures» in non-tested subjects (
like P.E.) that don't pass the laugh test and are helping to fuel the backlash to testing and
accountability writ large.
The only truly strong defense of legislative decisions is having a focus on outcomes — developing a strong
accountability system, introducing incentives for higher performance, developing reliable
teacher evaluation systems, and the
like.
Chris Cerf argued for the critical role of big system changes around things
like accountability, standards, and
teacher evaluation.
Formerly significant issues
like school
accountability and
teacher evaluations have been watered down or ignored.
In a relatively short time, a stunning number of
accountability - based leaders have been forced from office on a tide of voter resentment even while, as documented by historian Diane Ravitch, the
likes of Gates, Broad, and hedge fund billionaires continue their corporate - style push toward school closures, choice, data - driven student and
teacher evaluation, and high - tech innovation.
Over the past ten years, the policies undergirding the national education reform movement — offering more school choice, weakening
teacher union power, and creating new
accountability systems (with incentives
like pay - for - performance and
teacher evaluations based partly on student test scores)-- have taken hold in the nation's capital.
In doing so, it hands more control to states over things
like accountability, testing, standards and
teacher evaluations.
Another word for this sort of responsibility is «
accountability,» a much - maligned word in the education arena, often clustered with other imprecations
like «No Child Left Behind,» «Race to the Top,» «standardized tests,» and «value - added
teacher evaluations.»