States also made significant adjustments to their accountability models, including ensuring high schools are held
accountable for graduation rates, bolstering subgroup accountability, and strengthening the criteria schools and districts must meet before they are no longer deemed low - performing.
It's an open question whether we'll make the equivalent policy adjustments in higher education as we did in K - 12: will someone create a «GED for college» or will we start holding colleges
accountable for their graduation rates to boost education attainment?
Not exact matches
Senate Republicans plan to cover a range of issues with mayoral control, includnig student performance,
graduation rates, and «the effectiveness of having a single person
accountable for the public school system as compared to the previous community board system.»
Senate Republicans plan to cover a range of issues with mayoral control, including student performance,
graduation rates, and «the effectiveness of having a single person
accountable for the public school system as compared to the previous community board system.»
For a decade now, federal policy has required states to measure graduation rates uniformly, to set ambitious goals for raising those rates, and to hold high schools accountable for meeting such goa
For a decade now, federal policy has required states to measure
graduation rates uniformly, to set ambitious goals
for raising those rates, and to hold high schools accountable for meeting such goa
for raising those rates, and to hold high schools
accountable for meeting such goa
for meeting such goals.
First,
graduation decisions are mostly left up to the schools and districts that are supposedly
accountable for them.
According to the piece, states will now be
accountable for: • Tracking the performance of public and charter schools • Track data that allows
for comparison of student subgroups • Promote increased academic performance and
graduation rates
For the first time, this sweeping federal legislation requires states to hold their public high schools accountable for both achievement - test scores and graduation rat
For the first time, this sweeping federal legislation requires states to hold their public high schools
accountable for both achievement - test scores and graduation rat
for both achievement - test scores and
graduation rates.
Specifically, the report recommends giving
graduation rates the weight they deserve in ESSA so that schools and districts are held
accountable for graduating underserved students.
It looks like a very rational but dishonest response to accountability systems that are now holding schools and districts
accountable for increasing their high school
graduation rates.»
Under ESSA, states must hold schools
accountable for student performance in English language arts, or ELA, and mathematics; a second academic indicator, such as growth in ELA and mathematics; progress in achieving English language proficiency; high school
graduation rates, if applicable; and at least one measure of school quality or student success.
Accountability: nine states now hold high schools
accountable for the college readiness of their graduates and offer incentives
for improving college - ready
graduation rates, while eight more are planning to do so.
ESSA legislation puts additional pressure on schools and districts to be
accountable for raising
graduation rates
for students across subpopulations.
This should involve increased efforts to support more students with disabilities in general education settings, the maintenance of high expectations
for students and clear mechanisms to hold district and school leaders
accountable for the performance and
graduation of students with disabilities.
But the DOJ could hold Starkville
accountable for student achievement gaps — on test scores,
for example, or
graduation rates — if it wanted to.