Crazy statistical inference of the week We can measure a higher daily average temperature while
accumulating less heat due to the biases created by the minimum.
But the ocean seems to be
accumulating less heat.
But the ocean seems to be
accumulating less heat.
Thus we can conclude of maximum temperatures remain the same, then pots with the higher minimum
accumulated less heat
Not exact matches
The reasons clearly lie in the shift in the distribution of the
accumulating heat in the ocean to greater depths with
less remaining on the surface.
Many of the projects we look at as being carbon - friendly (i.e. construction of a major green energy or clean transport project) are significantly
less so since the big burst of carbon from construction, which happens at the start of the project, hangs around for decades
accumulating more
heat than early LCAs accounted for (an abbreviated treatment of this concept is in Kendall, Chang & Sharpe, Environ.
If
less energy comes in, the governor will try to maintain the energy flux into the system (Willis's retarding the appearance of clouds) but once all stops have been pulled out (the sky is clear morning to night), then the engine slows down — slower air and water currents,
less addition of
heat to the polar areas, dissipation of what
heat has
accumulated by radiation into space and return cold water not getting the
heating it formerly did.
LIA wasn't GLOBAL cooling; but colder in Europe, north America — because Arctic ocean had
less ice cover - > was releasing more
heat / was
accumulating - > radiating + spreading more coldness — currents were taking that extra coldness to Mexican gulf — then to the Mediterranean — because Sahara was increasing creation of dry
heat and evaporating extra water in the Mediterranean — to top up the deficit — gulf stream was faster / that was melting more ice on arctic also as chain reaction — Because Mediterranean doesn't have enough tributaries, to compensate for the evaporation deficit.
There doesn't seem to be a reservoir of
heat accumulating anywhere so if warming resumes it will probably be at the 1990s rate or
less.
They found that during these hiatus decades,
less heat accumulates in the upper layers of the ocean, and more
accumulates in the deeper layers (Figure 3).