Sentences with phrase «accurate enough»

On the other side of the desk, recruiters and hiring managers: Use that paper or digital resume as a time saving device to get a fast (5 - 45 second) take on a candidate; fast and accurate enough to rule you in or out of consideration.

Your job title and description must be appealing enough to attract an ideal new hire and accurate enough to draw in a candidate whose experience and skills are aligned with the role itself.

Now it needs to ensure that the data is accurate enough so that the sleep condition can actually be identified.

Basically currently indoor navigation is a pain in the ass because GPS is not accurate enough.

This is pretty good for not having a connected smartphone nearby, but not accurate enough to rely on for every workout.

Doi now believes that the model is accurate enough to be able to distinguish between cuts of meat and the placement of the toppings.

It's nice that they manage Portrait mode on both the back and front, but they're not quick or accurate enough to challenge the shooters on premium phones from 2017.

Listening to music while working out is a wonderful experience with these earbuds, but the heart rate monitor wasn't accurate enough.

In its best preset mode, Theater, it turned in accurate enough results on our color charts, even though it had a slight tendency to drift to the warmer red end of the spectrum.

The colours are simply not accurate enough.

Unfortunately, while the GPS and step - tracking is accurate enough, the heart - rate sensor follows on in the tradition of other Android Wear smartwatches - it's pretty unreliable.

The downside is that the design is a little bland, even if the information you gather, synced with Garmin Connect, is nicely presented and accurate enough.

The purpose of this Point Cloud Depth Camera is to provide facial recognition accurate enough for biometrics and 3D facial mapping for animation purposes.

Colors seem accurate enough to the naked eye, straight on, but not from any angle — tilt the HTC U Ultra a little to the side, and blues and reds appear washed out.

The sensor is certainly accurate enough, and there's plenty of buttons.

The cutouts are accurate enough for easy access to the ports, buttons, speakers and camera.

The iPhone X arrives with this year's killer feature: true, three - dimensional facial recognition and tracking that are secure enough to unlock your phone and authenticate payments, and accurate enough to turn your face into an animated emoji.

For the serious runner, the Gear Fit just doesn't offer enough yet, nor does it feel accurate enough to rely on as your sole exercise device.

The current Apple Watch Series 3 already packs some impressive heart - rate monitoring technology, and is currently being tested by the University of California San Francisco to see whether its accurate enough to detect atrial fibrillation.

Kenji's new theory is that the model is accurate enough to distinguish very subtle differences between cuts of the meat, or the way toppings are served.

This is part of the art direction that Sledgehammer refers to as «dark and beautiful,» meant to cause players to have a more emotional reaction to the game than past Call of Duty titles, and the team believes that the game is historically accurate enough to teach a new generation the basics of the war in Europe.

Thanks to the built - in sensors, the Bridge headset for iPhone is powerful and accurate enough to create detailed 3D maps of your surroundings.

It's just not accurate enough.

That reference to Walker Estate is an accurate enough paraphrase of a sentence in Walker Estate, but it ignores the context.

What follows is accurate enough for daily practice, except in exceptional cases (which by definition shouldn't be part of daily practice).

Do you think the technology is accurate enough to take the place of contract reviewers and — more importantly — do you think the technology is fully defensible and do you think judges have demonstrated that they consider automated review acceptable?

To make clear, in case you've not read B&R, they reject the notion that there's not enough or accurate enough data.

All mass balance I need is based on the calculated emissions and measured increased of CO2, which are more than accurate enough...

Of course this assumes global average sea level is accurate enough for the task and on a year - to - year basis it probably isn't but on a decade - to - decade basis it probably is.

How can you tell that the TOA perspective, accurate to «first - order», is accurate enough to calculate the change in the mean surface temperature (following an increase in forcing at the surface) to the first significant figure?

Are estimates of annual CO2 emissions accurate enough to detect reductions on that scale?

Even if Earth truly were a flat disk without terrain, and even if the energy transfer processes were linear, and even if the system were in steady - state, the models would not be accurate enough to make a long - term forecast of the effects of doubling CO2 because the models can not even predict changes in cloud cover.

The meat of the matter is why the different adjustment procedures don't agree and if there is any way to get accurate enough temperature estimates to make useful estimates of the accumulated energy.

They could both be accurate enough (for short term and long term, respectively), or they both could be way off.

The models have become accurate enough that they've been used for regional predictions of atmospheric temperatures, and those predictions have all been shown to need ACO2 in order for the models to match reality (See Figure 9.12, IPCC AR4 WG1 Chapter 9, page 695).

Satellite measurements might be «close enough for many applications», but even warmists scientists admit they can't actually measure the alleged imbalance because the instruments aren't precise and accurate enough.

Routine weather satellites don't work — you need specially designed radiometers to be accurate enough.

There is no validation of «natural» models, and no accurate enough data in the past to validate them at the needed accuracy.

These are very different things and people are seldom accurate enough to tell us which one is meant.

Some people appear to tell that there's empirical evidence for that, but the measurements are probably not accurate enough for drawing conclusions either way based on them.

Being expected to accept that large a difference in something so simple inspires no confidence in me results generated from more complicated things such as GCMs are accurate enough to warrant changing my views on global warming.

In reality — both are not accurate enough to say anything much over such short periods and with such huge variability.

Tornado records are not accurate enough to tell whether tornado intensity has changed over time.

This is all given that ARGO data is accurate enough to depend on which is assumed only for the sake of argument.

Such parameterizations are accurate enough over limited ranges and fail often badly outside those ranges.

And all because we have the temerity to say that statistical manipulations have made a minor observation stronger than true - to - the - facts, and that computer models are not, based on comparison to observation, looking accurate enough to deep - six the fundamentals of our civilization.

Generally speaking, a very small effect could be an accurate enough assessment.

A blog post is normally not accurate enough to see what someone did wrong.

I hope to live long enough to read presentations of systems of nonlinear dynamic systems that are complete enough, tested enough, and accurate enough to make reasonably dependable predictions at least decades ahead.

The first point is accurate enough, but the point about Queensland proves the opposite of what the Oz wants us to believe.