In my experience, the Vivoactive 3 was perfectly
accurate for fitness tracking, and most reviewers have found the Ionic to be equally great.
Not exact matches
The waterproof Ionic can
track swimming, running and other
fitness activities automatically,
for instance, and has more
accurate sensors than competing products
for everything from collecting heart rates to using GPS to
track distances.
But with a battery life of 5 days, a sleek and simple design, and
accurate step
tracking, the Fitbit Charge HR is still a great entry - level activity tracker
for the
fitness minded.
If you're looking
for more
accurate fitness tracking or better sleep metrics, you're better off with a Garmin or a Fitbit, but nothing touches Samsung
for an all - around experience.
It's packed full of the
accurate heart rate
tracking we've come to expect from Polar, and it also has some excellent
fitness apps
for running and other cardio exercise.
Well, theoretically it allows
for more
accurate fitness tracking, with similar capabilities to dedicated GPS running watches.
And you can use the Dash
for tracking basic
fitness metrics, but
for accurate heart rate measurements, you'll want to stick to a dedicated tracker.
For those of you who think the
fitness tracking on your Apple Watch or Android Wear is
accurate, guess again.
On the back of the casing is the typical heart - rate sensor; Huawei says its
fitness -
tracking capabilities are more
accurate than any of its competitors, but we're still waiting
for the company to back up that claim with some solid data.