We can not back away from assessments that give
us an accurate measure of student performance and that informs instruction,» she said.
Not exact matches
A few thousand well - selected subjects might give us an
accurate picture
of 4th graders in a state, but these types
of tests can not be used to
measure the
performance of a
student or school.
Performance measures based on the growth in
student achievement over time, which are only possible with annual testing, provide a fairer, more
accurate picture
of schools» contribution to
student learning.
A: SGOs can be based on assessments that teachers currently use to evaluate their
students, as long as they are fair and
accurate measures of their
students»
performance (see SGO guidebook for guidance on this).
Other differences come from the tests on which the value - added
measures are based; because test scores are not perfectly
accurate measures of student knowledge, it follows that they are not perfectly
accurate gauges
of teacher
performance.
The evidence from research on these and other systems indicate that through using
performance assessments schools can focus instruction on higher order skills, provide a more
accurate measure of what
students know and can do, engage
students more deeply in learning, and provide for more timely feedback to teachers, parents, and
students in order to monitor and alter instruction.
Research from educational experts and districts across the country have shown that using a combination
of teacher practice and
student learning data provides a more
accurate picture
of teachers»
performance than using either
measure on its own.
Most standard tests are designed to provide
accurate scores for
students near proficiency; because there are not enough items
measuring performance at the lower end
of the scale, the tests may provide very limited information about
students who score substantially below average.
Indeed,
students» high school
performance as
measured by GPA and course grades — even when self - reported by
students — is a much more
accurate indication
of student readiness.
Expand
accurate and robust accountability systems that value growth models and multiple
measures of student performance; and