Let's say we had a truly
accurate measure of these things — what then?
Not exact matches
When your baby is sick, one
of the first
things you'll want to do is have an
accurate measure of your baby's temperature.
It comes up with an
accurate measure of your reading pace after a few minutes, basically enough time to fall into a
measured pattern, and generally gets
things right from there.
If you oversimplify
things, the most
accurate measurement
of snow and ice thickness is done by being there — on the ice — drilling a hole and directly
measuring it.
It turns out that easily
measured things like the ability to run fast are not the useful statistics to use when assessing whether to recruit a player and how much to pay, but: «As bad as they may have been, the statistics used to evaluate baseball players were probably far more
accurate than anything used to
measure the value
of people who didn't play baseball for a living.»