We need
an accurate measure of student achievement and we must treat LEA's and our educators fairly in this process.
Not exact matches
Performance
measures based on the growth in
student achievement over time, which are only possible with annual testing, provide a fairer, more
accurate picture
of schools» contribution to
student learning.
The
Student Achievement Measure is supported by six sponsoring associations, working together to provide a more comprehensive and accurate picture of student progress and completion as students move across institutions and state boun
Student Achievement Measure is supported by six sponsoring associations, working together to provide a more comprehensive and
accurate picture
of student progress and completion as students move across institutions and state boun
student progress and completion as
students move across institutions and state boundaries.
Deliver
accurate measures of student progress and standards
achievement to schools and districts
For example, NAEP scores are
measures of the overall
achievement level
of students and not necessarily an
accurate reflection
of the quality
of each state's school system, yet they were used as the sole
measure of academic
achievement.
ASCD believes using growth models to
measure student progress presents an
accurate portrayal
of student achievement.
To sort
students into these two categories, a screening
measure does not need to be very comprehensive, it merely needs to focus on a specific skill that is highly correlated with a broader
measure of reading
achievement and that results in a highly
accurate sorting
of students.
A screening
measure needs to focus on specific skills that are highly correlated with broader
measures of reading
achievement resulting in a highly
accurate sorting
of students.
Deliver
accurate measures of student and class progress and standards
achievement to schools and districts