To be fair, I think the idea is to better communicate a more
accurate view of the science by avoiding unnecessary cultural pitfalls.
Not exact matches
We have endeavored to include up - to - date information that is
accurate to the best
of our knowledge; however, neither EMBO nor
Science's Next Wave can be held liable for any possible misinformation, expressed
view, or opinion stated herein.
In fact, the WGI report is built upon a process which, as revealed by the Climategate emails, is, by its very nature, designed not to produce an
accurate view of the state
of climate
science, but instead to be an «assessment»
of the state
of climate
science — an assessment largely driven by preconceived ideas
of the IPCC design team and promulgated by various elite chapter authors.
Surely this is merely an aberration, that in no way affects the
accurate reporting
of the overwhelming consensus
views of the settled
science as presented.
My point
of view as a contributor to the Climate Change National Forum is that people need the most
accurate possible understanding
of the
science of climate change.
Even though these are generally
accurate summaries
of the
science, they are written from a particular point
of view.